Caption
from the Wikipedia article on Cartoonist Thomas
Nast: "The Tammany Tiger Loose—`What are you
going to do about it?', published in Harper's Weekly
in November 1871, just before election day." Nast viewed
the Democratic political machine Tammany Hall, which depended
heavily upon an Irish Catholic support base, as a ferocious
enemy of real democracy in America. Actually the underlying
social and political reality behind Tammany Hall was more complex
than a situation involving just Irish Catholics alone; it was
a prototype of the 20th century "Liberal Minority Coalition"
described by Wilmot Robertson in the Dispossessed
Majority with Jewish brains and financial power at
the top, and Irish and Italian Catholic front men and brawn
the next level down, and then miscellaneous other "minorities"
on the bottom rung. New York City has been a ground zero for
Jewish power in America ever since Peter
Stuyvesant, Director General of New Netherlands and New
Amsterdam, unsuccessfully
tried to evict them in the mid-17th century. In Chapt.
33 of my Mission of Conscience series I describe
how plutocratic Jewish families such as the Rothschilds were
a potent force throughout the 19th century in repeated efforts
to create a privately owned central bank in America. They were
also major monopoly players in the development of American banking,
railroads, and big oil, working through front men like J.P.
Morgan and John D. Rockefeller. Irish, Italian, and other Catholics
also provided key front men and muscle in the Jewish takeover
of Hollywood and other major corporate media by the early to
mid-20th century. In his 14 May 2010 article "Are
Liberals Anti-WASP?", Pat Buchanan lamented how later
in the 20th century the controllers of the Democratic Party
(ie. Jews) stabbed Irish and other Catholics in the back once
they were no longer needed, "...Not in living memory has
a Democratic president nominated an Irish, Italian or Polish
Catholic, though these ethnic communities once gave the party
its greatest victories in the cities and states of the North."
In other words, in the late 19th century/early 20th century,
not very wise, petty-greedy Irish Catholics and other Catholics
with a serious "envy problem" towards WASPs -- who
played a key role in supporting the Jewish takeover of America
and also the expansion of the Catholic population in America
to exceed the WASP population -- have now been hoisted on their
own petard.
Part
VI
First published 22 November 2011
Last updated, re-edited 13 June 2014
Contents
Appendices
Appendix
AContinued
discussion of "Possible Motive: Act
out subterranean ethnic/racial hatred for Cro-Magnon / Nordic
peoples" in Part
I by William B. Fox Appendix
B Three Gross Misconceptions that Too Many Americans
(Like Glenn Beck) Have About Norway and Norwegians
by William B. Fox Appendix
CAn Aside Regarding: False Flag Theory
and Conjecture.Is
it possible that the author of this web page may have been intended
as an opportunistic patsy while trying to organize a Fukushima-related
conference in Oslo?
When
WASPs try to function in a society where they have not only
become another minority, but are now subordinated to Catholics
and Jews, they begin to experience enormous problems in terms
of basic functionality that simply never existed when they lived
in homogeneous Nordic societies and were in control of their
own destinies. For
starters, in regard to the diffusion
of innovations paradigm developed by Everett Rogers, Nordic
societies tend to have a vastly higher percentage of individuals
in the innovators, early adopters, and early majority category.
This is a major reason why Scandinavian societies generally
have a higher level of scientific innovation per capita than
most other countries in the world, and seem to be better at
anticipating and heading off looming social problems before
they get overtaken by them, as noted in Lothrop Stoddard's chapter
"The
Nordic North." Once Nordic societies start heading
in a bad direction, it is easier for whistle-bowers to speak
up and for society as a whole to honestly lay its cards on the
table as a necessary prerequisite towards accurately identifying
the real nature of the underlying problems and developing wise
long term solutions.
Wikipedia
caption for diagram in the diffusion
of innovations article: "The diffusion of innovations
according to Rogers. With successive groups of consumers
adopting the new technology (shown in blue), its market
share (yellow) will eventually reach the saturation level.
In mathematics the S curve is known as the logistic function."
An
excellent illustration of superior Nordic operational planning
and execution on an anecdotal level is the book The
Arctic Grail: The Quest for the Northwest
Passage and The North Pole, 1818-1909 by Pierre
Berton, which described how different groups of Norwegians and
British competed against each other in the late 19th century
and early 20th century to be the first to navigate the Northwest
passage and reach the North and South Poles. The author commented
that while researching this book, it struck him how the Norwegian
explorers consistently made it look easy, whereas the British
kept making mistakes and losing people left and right. I
also once read a completely separate article in The Marine
Corps Gazette about leadership under extreme conditions
by Norwegian and British explorers that came to the same conclusion,
but did not state it as explicitly. The British were more likely
than the Norwegians to let their pride and ego interfere with
shrewd operational planning and making rational trade-offs.
Ironically, the Norwegians and English are normally viewed as
having a lot in common as fellow northern Europeans, but here
was a case where relatively small differences in a normal day-to-day
environment can literally become a matter of life and death
under extreme conditions. Superior
Nordic performance tends to show up in other areas as well.
In international rankings along such criteria as
lack of corruption and scientific literacy, Scandinavian
countries consistently rate at the top of the list. In contrast,
southern European countries tend to fall closer to the bottom.
There
is another fascinating study of relative northern European ethnic/national
performance under conditions of extreme stress titled A
Genius for War by Trevor N. Dupoy. A reviewer noted:
"The impetus for writing this book came while Trevor Depuy
was constructing a mathematical model for a World War II war
game based on the records of actual engagements between the
Germans and Allies. Much to his surprise, he learned that even
after several years of total war, homeland bombardment and facing
numerically superior enemies, the Germans still retained a 30%
edge in combat effectiveness. That is, on the battlefields of
Europe in 1944, 100 German troops were the equivalent 130 US
or British troops." Although
Israel is located in Asia, Ashkenazi Jews probably like to think
of themselves as superior to most Europeans, yet I saw one study
where Israel was rated more corrupt than all the countries of
Europe! To
keep things in perspective, I think it is very important for
readers to grasp how Nordic technological prowess, individualism,
and analytical independence evolved as a Darwinianadaptation to a severe semi-Arctic environment which
demanded such skills. For thousands of years, most
Norwegians have lived under highly dispersed conditions on homesteads.
Their ability to survive was heavily dependent upon their individual
capabilities, and their ability to be a jack of all trades.
They typically had to do a variety of things well, whether it
involved fishing, farming meager soil, hunting, or preparing
for hard winters. This included building seaworthy boats and
navigating the North Sea under a wide variety of conditions,
to include very dark and rainy winters and through violent storms.
All of this required strength in a variety of mental traits,
such as flexibility of mind, imagination, innovativeness, toughness,
and courage. In this kind of environment, it is not "perception
is reality," but rather "reality is reality."
Please
see the excellent overview article "Norwegian
Farm Culture" from Wikipedia which reinforces
all the points I am making here. (I link to a snapshot
of this article taken 29 May 2013) Catholic
societies have historically evolved in peasant societies in
warmer climates. The ability to survive and pass on ones genes
had more to do with continuously executing very stereotyped,
routine, and unimaginative farming operations, and staying within
the political graces of the "Good
ol' boy network" in the local village and their feudal
master. This is much more of a "don't rock the boat,"
"go along to get along," and "perception is reality"
kind of evolutionary environment compared to the much harder
physical challenges and more dispersed social conditions that
shaped Norwegians further to the north. Not
surprisingly, these kinds of people are more likely to function
within self-contained universes of dogma fed to them by authorities
than to think independently for themselves about underlying
realities. In addition, whenever they discover dogmas to be
false, they are more likely to shrug their shoulders and "go
along to get along." As a consequence, in Catholic societies
unproven dogmas tend to get piled upon unproven dogmas without
as many iconoclastic "counter predators" to keep "dogma"
predators in check compared to Nordic societies. In
addition, in Catholic societies many more forms of nonproductive
rent-seeking entities tend to get piled on top of each other,
certainly much more so than Nordic societies. All things held
equal between the two societies, Catholic societies are more
likely to become stagnant, nonproductive, and noncompetitive
from the higher ratio of dogmatists, mindless bureaucrats, and
other rent-seekers relative to truly analytical thinkers and
real producers. One
difficulty I have in explaining these differences is that we
are comparing population groups with each other rather
than individuals. This means we are dealing with statistical
concepts. One can always find individuals within any group who
defy particular stereotypes. For example, in Racial
Realities in Europe, Dr. Lothrop Stoddard has the chapter
"Composite
France" which describes Nordic and Celtic peoples in
the north and Alpine and Mediterranean peoples in southern France.
(Italy has similar differences with more Nordics and Celts north
of Rome vs.more Alpines, Mediterraneans and people with mixed
and degenerate racial stock to the south). It is possible to
find blond-haired blued Catholics from northern France who have
very similar behavioral characteristics and competencies compared
to Nordic Scandinavians. While
Catholic societies may have fewer innovators and early adopters
as a percentage of their bell curves compared to Nordic societies,
they also tend to have vastly greater population sizes in southern
Europe, which means that the absolute number of innovators
and early adopters in certain southern European countries may
actually be higher than in certain Nordic countries. We
should also bear in mind that not all Catholic societies taken
as a whole are the same. For example French, German, Polish,
and Italian Catholics have sometimes gone to war with each other.
Even the Catholic Cardinal
de Richelieu, who at times savagely persecuted Protestants
inside France, supported Protestant armies outside of France
against Catholic armies, because among other things, he was
more afraid of getting encircled by the Catholic Habsburg
Empire than having Protestant countries on his flanks. Catholics
societies tend to have a greater diversity of people compared
to Nordic societies, to include higher percentages of incompetent
and criminally dangerous people. One good example involves Italian,
Corsican, and Irish Catholic mafias, whose modus operandi are
alien to Nordic societies. A huge problem with the mass immigration
of Catholics into America beginning in the 1840's is that criminal
mafia subgroups of "bad Catholics" were able to slide
in on the coat tails of "good Catholics." A
friend of mine summed it up well when he observed that the addition
of Catholics to America created a huge sociological "blur"
that previously did not exist to any great extent back when
the United States was overwhelmingly WASP. In terms of their
family structures, tendencies towards rent-seeking, and tolerance
of graft and corruption, many Catholic groups are sociologically
about halfway between WASPs and Jews. In their political behavior,
they tend to opportunitistically swing back and forth between
WASPs and Jews in their loyalties much like the way Mestizos
tend to swing back and forth between whites and Indians in Latin
American politics, or Mulattos
between whites and blacks. Catholics
have provided vital front men and "muscle" for Jews
in America's big cities and other power centers. They have also
provided a critical "power drive train" and a "sociological
blur" that has enabled extremely psychopathic Jews who
rise to the top to carry out their evil schemes. (For example,
please see Final Judgment about the Mossad-CIA murder
of JFK and the The
High Priestsof
Warabout the shanghai of American foreign by Israel).
On top of all this, thanks to the melting pot ideology, intermarriage
between Catholics and WASPs in America has weakened WASP identity
even further, making it even harder for WASPs to differentiate
themselves on a cultural, moral, and ethnic level from the greater
levels of corruption and inefficiency that historically accompany
Catholics and Jews. In
his book Ways
That Are Dark, Ralph Townsend makes an analogy between
Japanese and the Chinese (the latter are often called "The
Jews of the East") based upon his experience with the American
consulate in Shanghai in the early 1930's that I found strikingly
similar to my experience with Norwegians as compared to Catholics
and Jews in New York City. Townsend said that Americans who
were initially new to both the Japanese and Chinese invariably
favored the Chinese over the Japanese upon initial contact,
because the Chinese were much better at acting affable and telling
Americans what they want to hear. However, after gaining a few
years of experience dealing with both groups, Townsend noted
that Americans invariably began to prefer the Japanese over
the Chinese. The reason is that the Chinese were notorious for
double-crossing Westerners, whereas Japanese were much more
reliable and "honorable" by Western standards. (Please
see additional comments on this topic in my Preface
to Townsend's Ways
That Are Dark) Similarly,
Nordic peoples tend to stand further apart and gesticulate less
when they speak with each other (as noted in Body
Language by Julius Fast), and come across as a bit
more cold, starchy, and reserved compared to back-slapping,
good-buddy, hail
fellow well-met Irish and Italian Catholics and Jews. Nordics
are a stoic people. Nordic men don't hug and kiss their close
male friends and kinsmen like Italian men, or for that matter
many French counterparts. I recollect surfing a Finnish web
site, in which someone stated that small talk is almost unknown
in Finland (Finns get down to business very quickly). In contrast,
with Jews it is almost the opposite, after all, schmooze
is a Yiddish word. As another interesting anecdote, when former
U.S. Senator from Texas, U.S. Senate Majority Leader and President
Lyndon
Johnson visited Finland in the late 1950's, he did a "Howdy-Partner"
hand pumping, back-slapping greetings routine when he first
met Finnish dignitaries at the airport. This perceived "excessive
familiarity" drew a very negative reaction in the Finnish
press. (In fairness to real Texans as well as Finns,
there is strong evidence that both
LBJ and his wife Lady Bird were crypto-Jews and cooperated
with Mossad-CIA-MI6 to assassinate John F. Kennedy while
U.S Vice President in order to become President. The stories
of Johnson's "vulgarities" are myriad, ranging from
cussing out the slightest errors of Congressional aids and White
House staffers to showing
off his belly surgical scars to reporters to dictating to
female secretaries while sitting on the toilet. Johnson was
more of a perverse, crooked, "schmalzy-kitschy" version
of a "Texas Cowboy" than the real thing, and maybe
this is what the Finns sensed right away). These kinds
of anecdotes give one a sense of what an Icelandic scholar meant
when he referred to fellow Nordics as "An aristocratic
people with egalitarian tendencies." On
a purely interpersonal level, most Americans probably have an
initial personal preference for Irish and Italian Catholics
and Jews, just like Ralph Townsend's description of 1930's Americans
in China who initially preferred the Chinese over the
Japanese. However, if performance, productivity, long range
planning, honesty and operational efficiency are the name of
the game, most people discover that dealing with people like
the Irish Catholics often produces more glad-handing than real
results -- just look at the level of corruption in Irish Catholic-run
places like Chicago and Boston! Dealing with the Jews tends
to result in too many scams, too much intrigue, too much criminal
gangsterism, too much treachery, too much financial speculation,
and not enough real productivity and other honest results. Just
look at the state of Israel -- an economic basket case hopelessly
dependent on massive foreign aid wheedled out of Congress and
from Pentagon black budgets ever since inception -- with no
end in sight! And then, on top of all the tens of trillions
of dollars that Americans and Europeans have already given Israel,
these parasites have the nerve to pull New York 9/11, London
7/7, and now Oslo/Utoya 7-22! They also threaten Americans with
FEMA slave-death camps, have their TSA goons "dog train"
Americans with genital-groping at airports, and have their media
remain silent while Fukushima radiation continues to poison
America and Europe --from their Stuxnet virus!. Their
depravity and shamelessness is infinite. The
book In
Praise of Hard Industries:Why Manufacturing,
Not the Information Economy, Is the key to Future Prosperity
by Eamonn Fingleton points out that in the long run, the
real foundation of healthy economic growth involves the continued
maintenance and development of a strong, vigorous, and innovative
manufacturing base. A healthy, advanced industrialized society
maintains its manufacturing base at about 33% of GDP. (An important
reason why America is not healthy is because "under
Jewish management" the U.S. manufacturing base has been
reduced to less than 10% of GDP over the last several decades).
Nothing can scale up wages and productivity growth like manufacturing.
Conversely, if one loses this manufacturing base, one loses
the real basis of a productive economy. This can have dire consequences.
In fact, instead of living in an expanding economic pie where
jobs are plentiful and real pay scales are always rising, the
exact opposite trend starts to take place as the industrial
base shrinks, as America has discovered in the last several
decades as it has outsourced over 75% of its industrial base
in order to make short term transactional profits and exploit
cheap Third World labor. Jews
are addicted to short term transactional profit taking and can
not identify with the long term industrial growth strategies
once favored by WASPs when they ran this country in the 19th
century with the Protestant work ethic. Jews are also addicted
to immediately shifting production towards the lowest cost labor
anywhere in the world that they can find it, unlike WASPs who
are vastly better at nurturing and driving up worker productivity
on the home front, which in turn hiked real wages. It
gets even worse from a WASP perspective. When WASPs complain
about how America is falling apart, Jews and Catholics may pay
lip service, but they fail to take any timely and decisive steps
to fix the underlying problems. Instead they continue to hire
their own kind and squeeze out even more WASPs at the top. It
is the same old pattern. Jews tend to react to problems created
by too much intrigue by adding even more deception
(for example, by trying to sell us the phony Iraq WMD's, fake
Al Qaeda, and Global War on Terror as a distracter from America's
escalating economic problems). Catholics tend to react to problems
created by a dwindling entrepreneurial class and by a declining
supply of independent critics (for example, related to the steady
decline of WASPs in America) with even more authoritarian
regulation (for example, myriad additional regulations created
by the Department of Homeland Security) and even more
dogmatic fanaticism completely decoupled from common sense and
reality (for example, by putting veterans, "Constitutionalists",
and Ron Paul supporters on the MIAC suspect list; for more on
the Missouri
Information Analysis Center or "MIAC" please see
Chapter
23 and Chapter
28). Many
Irish and Italian Catholics act like white versions of Negroes
in Zimbabwe and South Africa. As both of these Africans countries
started to fall apart from black incompetence following the
step-down in white rule, the blacks in power continued to hire
more blacks and squeeze out more whites, to include looking
the other way as millions of whites were made unemployed and
even homeless. As black gangs started to go around kill white
farmers and squat on their land, black authorities looked the
other way. Not
only are we seeing many Irish and Italian Catholic leaders in
America act like "white Negroes," but we are also
seeing the resurrection of many Catholic ghosts that most Americans
thought were put to bed in the 19th century when WASP success
with the industrial revolution, advances in science, and the
spread of the Enlightenment left orthodox Catholicism in the
dust. In a back-handed way, many Catholics validate all of this
by their hypersensitivity to 19th century stereotypes. See for
example Irish
and Italian communities come together to stop Thomas Nast Hall
of Fame honorItalian group agrees
Nast’s cartoons were “especially blatant in his
hostility and bigotry towards Irish Catholics”
by Kate Hickey, IrishCentral Editor, published Thursday, January
19, 2012. I
can discern a resurrection of the ancient "Viva Yo!"
authoritarian mentality described by James Michener in his book
Iberia, which means "Hooray for me, and to hell
with everyone else!!!" It is the mentality of the iron-fisted
fascist-caesarist-conquering-slave whipping cuadillo
on steroids. How dare Muammar
Gaddafi try to surrender under a white flag -- slaughter
him and his entire motorcade in cold blood! How dare Norwegians
withdraw from attacking Libya -- smack them hard with Oslo-Utoya!
How dare the Japanese support Palestinians or balk at Jewish
international banker demands -- dirty nuke their country through
the Stuxnet virus!! One
of the most shocking aspects of all this from a WASP perspective
is how our ancestors saw this kind of power-mad, intolerant,
brutal arrogance centuries ago -- yet the ghosts of the past
keep roaring back. For example, when Britain requested a measure
of political and religious independence in the 16th century,
the Vatican and Spanish empire could only think about sending
mighty Armadas to crush them, well-equipped with torture racks
and thumb screws. When the Dutch complained about abusive Spanish
Catholic rule in the 16th century, the Spanish empire responded
with a brutal military occupation. Pushed to the wall, the humble
"we beg of thee" petition by Dutch leaders transformed
into the "Sea Beggar" insurgency at sea and the "Dutch
Revolt," which ultimately became successful in throwing
off the Spanish yoke. The
upshot is that as long as Nordic Norwegians are allowed to run
their own homogeneous Nordic society, one can safely bet that
they will always be at the forefront of self-sufficiency, standard
of living, and technological progress. If one could make stops
in a time machine at 50 year intervals years into the future,
one could feel strongly assured that so long as Norwegians are
able to maintain their fragile Nordic folk culture, and also
maintain a society made up overwhelmingly of Nordic peoples
and ruled by Nordic peoples, they will always be all right by
themselves. It is also very likely they will always have some
surplus left over to continue providing humanitarian aid to
other peoples around the world. You
can't say this about any predominately Catholic or Jewish-controlled
countries in this world. Catholic
countries tend to be more stagnant than their WASP counterparts.
I got a strong sense of this when I traveled through Europe
on a Eurail Pass in 1980. As a rule of thumb, as one traveled
from northern to southern Europe, the level of "randomness"
and "disorder" seemed to increase across all aspects
of society. (I explain the evolutionary logic behind all of
this in my online environmental
vs. genetic duality article, particularly where
I reference Why Civilizations Self-Destruct by Dr.
Elmer Pendell). As one example of increasing social disorder
as one heads southward, I could set my watch by the time that
trains arrived and departed at German train stations, whereas
at the main station in Rome, I saw many trains making last minute
changes in both tracks and time. I heard Germans quietly joke
among themselves that "Africa
begins south of the Alps." As mentioned earlier, southern
Italy and Sicily are so heavily infested with criminal mafias
that no one has ever been able to figure out how to get rid
of them. Sometimes I almost wonder if another reason why my
kinsmen in Norway got whacked on 7-22 is because perhaps some
Norwegian might have told a bad Italian
joke about someone's mother, grandmother, or godfather or
whatever and it inadvertently got back to former CIA Director,
and current Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who may subconsciously
envy and hate WASPs because of ethnic-genetic
distance factors involving his Roman Catholic/southern Italian
ancestry. One
of the biggest problems with Catholic societies is that they
tend to be so authoritarian, so status quo, and otherwise stagnant
that they are incapable of continually expanding the proverbial
economic pie. Their politicians are usually incapable of living
within their means and maintaining a stable currency, Their
industrialists are heavily reliant on northern European companies
for expertise. One can almost predict with mathematical certainty
that every so often the economic pie will stop expanding, and
in fact start contracting. This puts everyone in Catholic society
through a nasty "life boat" situation. (Please recall
the proverbial "life
boat" paradigm used for discussions of situation ethics,
where the "captain" of an over-packed boat in the
middle of the ocean may have to make hard decisions about who
to throw overboard as the storm waves rise higher, or who not
to accept on board who is swimming towards the lifeboat
from a sinking ship). In the macro-social equivalent of the
:lifeboat" paradigm, those very same jovial Catholics who
are such terrific glad handers at the local pub can suddenly
turn very mean, vicious, and duplicitous. I personally would
prefer to hang out with fellow frosty Nordics who have a vastly
greater capacity for long range operational planning and implementation,
and trade a few backslaps in the short run for greater social
stability and productivity in the long run.
The
Alfred Hitchcock film Lifeboat is a good metaphor for
the typical endgame in societies where Jews and Catholics have
shoved WASPs aside and think they have all the answers, as witnessed
by the current global
depopulation agenda, encroaching police state, and recurring
false flag terror attacks.
Of
course as much as Catholic societies tend to be more unstable
compared to WASP societies, Jewish society is even more uncertain.
Nobody on this planet has any idea what Israel might look like
fifty years from now, or whether it will even be around. It will
be hard for Israel to continue soaking tens of trillions more
dollars of aid out of the U.S. like it has since its inception,
one reason being that the U.S. is undergoing various forms of
bankruptcy and major demographic changes so fast that no one knows
how much longer the U.S. itself is going to be around. Will Jewish
globalists succeed in their psychotic plans to depopulate over
80% of humanity, microchip the survivors, and rule with an iron
hand over the entire planet from Jerusalem? Will they fulfill
their age-old vision of "Greater Israel" that extends
from the Nile to the Euphrates -- after genociding all Palestinians
in Gaza and the West Bank off the face of the planet? Will they
implement their "Samson Option" plan to take down all
of earth with nuclear weapons, going a bit further than their
current Fukushima "dirty nuking" of the northern hemisphere
-- after their sabotage via HAARP and the Stuxnet virus -- a global
catastrophe that is already rated 300 times worse than Chernobyl?
Will they continue with the depleted uranium stealth mass murder
of millions of innocent civilians ranging from Gaza to Lebanon
to Iraq to Afghanistan (and also in countries like Iran and Pakistan
caught in-between? -- see Leuren Moret's discussion
of the stealth depleted uranium wars, which have also incapacitated
55% of American soldiers). Will Jewish plans somehow go wrong,
and cause an enraged global population suddenly turn on Jews everywhere? Without
question, when it comes to Jews, the plausible menu of possible
future outcomes is vastly more diverse, extreme, and bizarre than
anything I am aware of involving either Catholic or WASP societies.
Larry
and Rudy make another fine Jewish-Roman Catholic wise guy "contribution"
to America on 9/11
One
of the great tragedies I have observed from first hand experience
is that on a deep sociological level, in a large urban, multicultural,
multiracial environments like New York City, Chicago, or Los
Angeles, WASPs (particularly "Scandinavian types")
have a very hard time competing for economic and political power
against Jews and Catholics. In fact, in the absence of any extraordinary
social or political measures (like the secessionism behind the
Protestant Reformation) they tend to get squeezed out over time.
A lot of the reasons are sociobiological or instinctive in nature,
in which the evolutionary history of Nordic peoples makes them
poorly equipped in terms of their innate temperamental traits
for the kinds of political struggles waged in major urban environments.
I could write endless pages on this topic alone, but would like
to save that discussion for another time. Suffice to say for
here that there is plenty on an anecdotal level that helps illustrate
the case. For example, when a wave of Norwegian immigrants arrived
at Ellis Island in the 1870's, most of them could not wait to
move on to the open spaces and start clearing farms and ranches
in places like Minnesota and North Dakota. Norwegians who remained
in New York City area tended to congregate in lower density
areas like Brooklyn rather than live higher density Manhattan.
Norwegians tend to be a blend of both the physical and intellectual,
producing a disproportionate share of both research scientists
and explorer-adventurers. In contrast, Jewish immigrants were
delighted to pack themselves in like sardines in the already
most densely populated parts of Manhattan and stay there. This
should not be terribly surprising, since throughout most of
their evolutionary history in the last several thousand years
the Jews have been the most urban of all peoples and have tended
to segregate themselves from other peoples in their own ghettos.
This brings us back to a saying that I mentioned earlier, namely
that you can take Jews out of the ghetto, but you can't take
the "ghetto" out of the Jews. *
Jews are much more aggressive about cold-call canvassing and
aggressive business networking than Scandinavians. They are
famous for their "chutzpah" and fast-talking ability
to sell refrigerators to eskimos and sand to Arabs. They are
also the biggest professional whiners on this planet, forever
milking sympathy by whatever means necessary, obsessing
over all real or imagined tales of persecution. All these traits
can actually help business success in certain dense, impersonal,
urban environments where mass-marketing aggressiveness and transactional
expertise can directly correlate with sales success. In contrast,
Scandinavians are almost at the other extreme compared to stereotypical
Jewish traits, emphasizing stoicism, plain dealing, modesty,
and putting the focus on the creation of quality products that
sell themselves ahead of hype. *
In Chapter
38 of my Mission of Conscience
I observe how Jews are in a state of permanent war against the
gentile world:
The
Jews are the "Mongols" of covert forms of 4th generation
warfare, every bit as much as the Mongols themselves were
the masters of overt forms. Jews run organized crime in America
and other major countries around the world, which is a mainstay
of covert 4th generation warfare. They are also typically
leaders in the types of businesses that involve brokerage
and other forms of mediation.
In
contrast, Scandinavians typically act like happy-go-lucky, naive,
disorganized individualists in a normal civilian peacetime environment.
I am reminded of an observation made by a tactics instructor
back when I was in military officer training, namely "A
bad plan, well-executed, can defeat an opponent who has no plan
at all." Scandinavians and other WASPs around the world
generally speaking have no plan to cope with the sophisticated
permanent covert 4th generation warfare threat aimed at them
by Jews and their allies. Another
important advantage that Jews enjoy over Scandinavians -- who
always tend to naively project their own rationalistic and altruistic
tendencies on to other peoples -- is the element of surprise.
("Surprise" is one of the "principles
of war" contained in U.S. Army Field Manual FM 3-0).
I mean this in the same sense that James A. Michener described
a real life villain in his book Rascals
in Paradise named Sam Comstock
According to Michener, Comstock had a "secret weapon,"
namely a plan that was so bizarre that no one could believe
anything so evil and irrational was in progress until it was
upon them --and by then it was usually too late. Comstock's
plan as a crewman on a 19th century whaling ship was to murder
his captain and declare a mutiny in daytime while his own ship
was running in parallel with another whaling ship in the mid-Pacific,
and then take the ship to some isolated island, beach it, and
then just "hang out." What is incredible is he actually
succeeded in murdering his captain, organizing a mutiny, peeling
away from the other whaling ship with his crimes undetected
in broad daylight, and making it to an isolated island -- where
disenchanted fellow crewman finally turned on him and killed
him. (See more discussion of Comstock in my parasitism
article). Similarly,
Zionist plans for starting ever more wars in Asia, Africa, and
South America; hollowing out the U.S. economy and then imploding
it, waging global depopulation radiation warfare, promoting
open borders policies to deliberately biologically replace WASPs
and other whites with nonwhites, inserting toxins in drinking
water, vaccines, and chemtrails, and attacking Norway on 7-22
-- all these things make me suspect that latter-day Sam Comstocks
are running Israel, the U.S., and UK. If
Scandinavians and other WASPs can come up with viable plans
that realistically deal with this madness, and can start to
organize themselves, then I think they can stand a realistic
chance of being able to defend themselves against Jewish criminals
and their minions. The problem is that so far I do not see any
real evidence of a serious planning and organization process
taking place. The
first step in any planning process for a hostile environment
involves accurately completing the intelligence cycle, which
in this case means that Nordic peoples must thoroughly understand
the "friendly situation" (this includes gaining an
intimate knowledge of their own inherent characteristics, resources,
and natural strategies), as well as the "enemy order of
battle" (which includes a through knowledge of the characteristics
of natural adversaries). At
this point I would like to review some major Jewish characteristics.
Serious farmers and ranchers among Jews are almost unknown,
in fact, the Talmud forbids manual labor. Jews are almost nonexistent
in hard contact or adventure sports. (In contrast Norwegians
are usually over represented in fishing
-- one of the dangerous occupations in the world -- and also
in military service and adventure sports). Jews are about ten
times under-represented compared to
the general occupation in regard to U.S. military service, but
ten times over represented in brokerage
and financial service industries and various professions. Part
of Jewish success in America is due to the fact that during
much of the late 19th century and 20th, economic and political
power tended to concentrate in the biggest cities in America.
The Jews were there en masse. They also spent more time than
any other groups developing strategies to benefit their own
kind. Another
reason for the Jewish rise to a supremacist position in America
involves the Jewish will for power. It is greater
than that of any other ethnic group in America, to include their
willingness to be totally ruthless. As an example,
in my discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology
in the parasitism
section of my mutualism
vs. parasitism article, I describe how Jews have been the
longstanding leaders of organized crime in America. Jews also
account for over 90% of the most serious and treasonous espionage
cases against the United States. They also much more skilled
at leading double lives, with a higher rate of homosexuality
than any other ethnic group. Most
of my fellow WASP friends who initially came to New York City
from the heartland tend to be very naive. They also tend to
go through some amazingly similar phases as they get to know
the Jews from first hand experience. Initially they are very
impressed with the Jews because of their sophistication, cleverness,
financial savvy, and formidable skill in "handling"
people. However, after they start gaining considerable first
hand interpersonal experience, other impressions start to sink
in, such as the idea that the Jews are very unnatural and psychopathic
people who carry quite a lot of subterranean hatred within themselves
towards all other peoples. (Where do you think the phrase "neurotic
New Yorker" comes from?) If they are not kept in check,
the Jews can even become an extremely dangerous people
-- even towards themselves.
Hey
Larry, Michael, Rudy, Janet, Richard, and Eric baby! Thanks
for making our case!
We just love ya'! Keep up it up!!!
Sometimes
I almost wonder if Jews like Larry Silverstein and Michael Chertoff,
Italian Catholics like Rudy
Giuliani and Janet Napolitano, Irish Catholics like Richard
Daley of Chicago, (away
in Israel while we were worried about a repeat 9/11 attack on
the Sears Tower) and African Americans like Attorney General
Eric Holder (closely
associated with the "Fast and Furious" Federal false
flag operation) are all secretly working for the Ku Klux
Klan. [Please see my "Editor's Note" in the paragraph
below for some qualifications about
the real KKK in American history]. It would be hard to come
up with a group of "leaders" whose abusive practices
would not do more to bring discredit upon Jews, Catholics, Blacks
and miscellaneous other "Liberal-Minority Coalition"
types and eventually cause WASPs to return to the kinds of social
and political attitudes that were commonly held by most white
Americans in the early to mid-19th century. The
early to mid-19th century was an era when most Americans lived
on farms and tended to derive their opinions from common sense
and first hand experience rather than channeled by Zionism,
Marxism, and corporate-controlled mass media -- and also before
American political attitudes got "iconized"
and "totalitarianized"
by "The
American Lenin". Not only do the aforementioned
groups habitually pile authoritarianism on top of authoritarianism,
and corruption on top of corruption, and therefore show that
they are unfit for republican government -- the standard Protestant
criticism of Catholics and Jews and "Miscellaneous Others"
-- but what they are trying to do to us today is actually far
worse than anything ever predicted by the American Party
(also called the "Know Nothing Party") of the 1840's
or the Ku Klux Klan of the1920's that wanted to keep Catholics
and Jews and "Miscellaneous Others" out of America.
I
challenge the reader to go to any historical archives and find
any predictions that are as bizarre and murderous as the the
idea that some day, after gaining the upper hand in America,
Jews and various Catholic minions and "Miscellaneous Others"
would dare to put up the Georgia
Guidestones and consciously work towards the mass
murder-depopulation of over 80% of humanity, or aid and
abet mass false
flag pandemics as well as radiation poisonings, or would
consider it desirable to create a micro-chipped global slave
population. [Editor's
Note: Ironically, I am using the Jewish-Hollywood
stereotype of the KKK to spoof the kinds of Jews and Catholics
who have made this stereotype possible in the first place. The
underlying political, social, and historical reality is actually
quite different. In fact, like so many things that involve America's
multicultural, multi-ethnic, "melting pot" society,
the ideological history is something of a convoluted, erratic,
blurry mess, often ruled by political expediency and crisis
management considerations rather than any consistent principles.
For example, the American Party or "Know Nothing Party"
of the 1840's, which existed well before the Klan was created
in 1865, was primarily against Catholic immigration. According
to Michael Collins Piper, it even had some Jews in leadership
roles! As a prime example of Jewish infiltration of top spots
in a "conservative cause," Judah
P. Benjamin served as the Secretary of State and Secretary
of War for the Confederate States of America. (The possibility
that the Rothschilds of Britain and France might provide critical
funding and other forms of support for the Confederate cause
was probably a major factor for why he obtained his position).
When the Ku Klux Klan was originally founded in 1865, the primary
issue was getting rid of oppressive Yankee-run carpetbagger
governments in the South. (In many Southern states, whites were
no longer allowed to vote, and their legislatures were run by
illiterate former black slaves who were handled by unscrupulous
Jews and Yankee abolitionists out to vindictively punish the
South and confiscate much of their remaining property by imposing
onerous taxes. In some areas, all-Negro Union occupation units
roamed about at will and raped white women. For one perspective
into this hell on earth, see "Franklin
J. Moses, Reconstruction's Most Infamous Scalawag"
by Michael Collins Piper about one of the most corrupt Jewish
politicians in American history who served as governor of South
Carolina). Anti-Catholicism was not the major issue at this
time, in fact, a number of top leaders of the Confederacy were
French Catholics, such as Gen.
Pierre Gustave Toutant Beauregard, victor of the First
Battle of Manassas and other major campaigns, and Admiral
Raphael Semmes, Captain of the raider C.S.S. Alabama and
one of the greatest naval commanders in American history. (According
to Wikipedia, Semmes' "1869 Memoirs of Service Afloat
During The War Between the States ....was viewed as one
of the most cogent, but bitter, defenses of the Lost
Cause.") Then by the 1920's, especially after the publication
of The International Jew by Henry Ford, the Klan gained
millions of members nationwide and started to focus on resistance
to Jews. Many Klan groups started to drop anti-Catholicism.
For example Rev. Charles Coughlin, a Catholic priest, offered
to officiate at a funeral of a Klansman as a form of reconciliation,
and his offer was accepted. Later on, when Dr. David Duke was
head of Klan organization in Louisiana in his younger years
in the 1960's and early 1970's (before he decided to go more
"mainstream" and become a Louisiana State representative),
he responded to a false ADL charge that he was trying to stir
up animosity between Catholics and Protestants by observing
that most of the members of his Klan organization in Louisiana
were Catholics! He also observed that their Klan activities
were always nonviolent, perfectly legal, and completely in keeping
with the Constitution. Then came another interesting ideological
twist. In his Foreword
to the Judas
Goats, Mike Collins Piper comments: "Edward R.
Fields, a veteran American nationalist, once revealed in his
popular journal, The Thunderbolt, when the FBI did
have infiltrators inside the KKK, the FBI instructed its informants
that while it was permissible for them to make anti-Black public
utterances, they should avoid making anti-Jewish remarks, an
interesting revelation indeed." In other words, now it
was "OK" for certain Klan organizations to be anti-black,
but no longer anti-Catholic or anti-Jewish, thanks to "FBI
guidance."] Getting
back to Norway, the "Viking" motif often used by Scandinavian
societies, in modern parlance, symbolizes societies that value
courage, innovation, entrepreneurship, rugged individualism,
exploration, the creation of useful goods, and the willingness
to take on tough challenges to achieve tough success. In essence,
the small Scandinavian countries are similar to entrepreneurial
companies in their culture, and sometimes even behave like small
companies. And in fact, the Scandinavian countries have always
been world leaders, particularly on a per capita level, in regard
to new technological development and the development of successful
entrepreneurial companies with top quality products. Often
as companies get larger, they lose the ability to innovate.
Among other things, they begin to attract people who are better
at bureaucratic politics than entrepreneurial analysis, goal
setting, and execution. In order to pursue new business plans,
it is very common for individuals with entrepreneurial talent
to break away from big companies to form their own relatively
small start-up companies. Similarly
in order to move ahead during the Renaissance, Scandinavians
and other northern Europeans had to break away from the Catholic
Church on a social, political, and economic level as well as
on a theological level to free themselves from the massive centralized
corruption and rent-seeking identified by Martin Luther and
other Protestant reformers. I
am reminded of the joke "God invented whiskey to prevent
the Irish from taking over the world." In the case of Scandinavians,
it appears that the Good Lord invented their rugged individualism
to accomplish the same purpose. It seems like most Scandinavian
heroes are stoic, rugged individualist, with their own view
of things, whether we are talking about the "Ash
Lad" ("Askeladden"),
a main character in many Scandinavian folk tales, or WWII resistance
fighters like Jan Baalsrud, subject ofWe
Die Alone: A WWII Epic of Escape and Endurance by David Howarth
and Stephen E. Ambrosee Die Alone. In regard to the
Wikipedia article "Askeladden" [this part was authored
by myself], it notes that:
In
modern parlance, the Ash Lad is an individualist, free-thinker,
and nonconformist who is capable of deep abstract, analytical
thinking "outside the box", or who can create a
scientific paradigm shift. He is capable of acting as a true
visionary or innovative early adopter. In contrast, the older
brothers are more conformist and conventional. [Editor's Note:
In Norwegian fairy tales, the Ash Lad has older brothers who
try to take on a difficult challenge and fail, and this of
course is where the Ash Lad steps in and proves himself].
The
Ash Lad
confronts a Troll in the forest. This particular type
is certainly much larger than the Mossad-CIA-MI6 version
which probably planted the bomb in Oslo. There is actually
a scientific "troll hypothesis" that links Trolls
to Mossad-types discussed elsewhere
on this web page, I kid you not!
Scandinavians
have not only seceded from Catholic countries, but have also
seceded from each other, such as when Norway completed its break
from Sweden
in 1905, and Iceland which became a separate
country in 1944 from Denmark. However, when viewed from
an entrepreneurial perspective, this is healthy so long as the
counties do not become too vulnerable to a hostile takeover,
as they say in business parlance, or a military overthrow, as
they say in political science. In
his Mises Institute lecture, Dr. Ralph Raico observed that the
breakup of the Roman Empire served the cause of liberty, because
now rulers had competition. If they raised taxes too much, or
became too oppressive, their most talented subjects had more
exit options to simply go somewhere else. This served as a deterrent
against oppressive behavior. Many
business analysts note how when entrepreneurs merge with big
companies, they typically lose their innovativeness. Furthermore,
as companies grow larger, they not only become inherently bureaucratic,
but increasingly become taken over by political managers who
are more interested in utilizing intrigue to get to the top
than focusing on new product development. The analogy with political
systems should be obvious, namely that one reason why Europe
generally "worked" in the 19th century is because
it was divided up into more natural states whose competition
with each other had many of the advantages of small business
competition. Each small state requires its own distinctive culture,
analogous to "corporate culture" in the McKinsey 7
S model, that gave a sense of purpose and cohesion. As Europe
became more consolidated with empires, and later into the EU,
and as doctrines of multiracialism have eroded indigenous European
cultures, the levels of overall corruption have skyrocketed.
Productivity has declined. All of this is analogous to what
business observers see all the time with the rise of imperial
corporations. America
"worked" in the 19th century because it was politically
decentralized. The Federal government extracted less than 5%
of GDP, compared to a total government "take" of somewhere
around 50% - 70% today, and up until 1865 a large segment of
the population took States' Rights very seriously). Furthermore,
first generation immigrant groups from northern Europe retained
strong indigenous European values, to include the Protestant
work ethic. America started to become totally dysfunctional
in the 20th century after the Federal government crushed all
forms of states rights and foisted mandatory social integration,
essentially making America like a big corrupt corporation, or
a latter day imperial Rome or New
Babylon. In
the business world, when corporations become too big and too
corrupt, the obvious solution is typically to spin off product
lines as separate companies, and create a unique corporate culture
for each firm that focuses on specific productivity goals. Similarly
in the political sphere, as empires become too big and corrupt,
the obvious answer should be to break them apart and restore
cohesive tribal cultures. Seen
from this perspective, America is too bloated with disparate
racial and ethnic groups and too obsessed with playing political
games to keep itself together and dominant in the world at all
costs, to include sponsoring false flag attacks. Furthermore,
the most corrupt globalists have risen to the top and are using
the U.S. as "the sole remaining superpower" to impose
their insane globalist-Zionist schemes on the rest of the planet.
The most obvious answer to this political problem, seen from
the perspective of standard business practices, is to break
America apart into logical ethnic and geopolitical components
as quickly as possible in the most sane, peaceful, and reasonable
manner possible. Given
that there are at least as many Norwegian Americans in America
as Norwegians and Norway, and furthermore that the United States
still remains one of the largest reservoirs of Nordic genes
in the world (despite the long term relative decline of this
population since the mid 19th century -- it also remains to
be seen what percentage will be mutilated from Fukushima radiation
-- in some parts of Belarus and the Ukraine only 20% of the
children are healthy on account of residual Chernobyl radiation),
one would think that Norway's leaders would want to spend more
time finding ways to help constructively manage the painful
transitional processes that lie ahead -- and also help warn
people around the world about the continuing Fukushima radiation
hazards -- rather than spend so much time hanging out with Zionist
globalist malefactors like George Soros and Larry Summers while
sweeping open discussion of the immigration issue under the
rug. (See the photo illustrations of Norwegian Prime Minister
Jens Stoltenberg with this bunch provided in
Part II). It
is important to note that entrepreneurial Nordic tendencies
are a two edged sword, where they can be great strengths in
some environments, and great weaknesses in others. They also
have important biological/evolutionary as well as cultural components.
Nordic
tendencies are a product of the requirement to make far-sighted
technological adaptations in a continuing war with nature in
a harsh Nordic environment. Passing on ones genes had quite
a lot to do with staying focused on long range operational goals
and adapting and improvising to meet them. As previously mentioned,
people were typically dispersed in the rugged fjord lands. A
large percentage of Norwegians made their living from fishing,
considered one of the most dangerous occupations in the world,
where most men could expect to eventually die at sea. Even in
farming, the margins of survival were so slim that it was not
uncommon for animals kept in a barn through the winter to be
so weak that they had to be carried to pastures to graze in
the spring. Survival had quite a lot to do with individual hard
work, resourcefulness, and the ability to stay mentally tough
and focused on critical long term issues. It supported more
of a "lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way"
operational approach to life than a touchy-feely political approach.
Germany 1914
by Friedrich August von Kaulbach
Because
of their well-roundedness, athletic qualities, and emphasis
on heroic values, it is not uncommon for political cartoonists
to associate Norwegians and other peoples of the North with
"king predator" animals at the top of the food chain,
just like the animal symbols that once appeared on the shields
of their warriors. These animals include lions (a heraldic symbol
of Norway), unicorns (a symbol of Britain along with the lion),
bears (Russia), wolves (worshipped by Mongols),
double eagles (Germany, Russia, Austria), and dragons (on
the sails of Viking ships). These are all real or mythical animals
that retain all the hunter instincts of their most ancient ancestors.
They are also the most proud, noble, and intelligent animals
of their food chain, are highly exploratory, engage their prey
in a bold and powerful manner, and are often chivalrous in their
competition with their own kind. They may be tamable,
but they can rarely if ever bedomesticated.
Deep down inside, they are always a bit wild. All
these characteristics, incidentally, have a correlation with
the maintenance of a healthy republican society, where individuals
feel empowered enough to resist state intrusion into their personal
space. They also feel exploratory and dominant enough to want
to have a say in their government. The acknowledgement of "human
rights" may be viewed as an attempt to curtail overly vicious
competition, much like the chivalrous competition instinctively
practiced between "king predator" mammals such as
wolves and bears of the Northlands when they duel over a female.
All
of this is quite unlike the viciously demeaning and slave-inducing
mentality behind the genital-groping "dog training"
visited upon Ron Paul and Governor Jesse Ventura by TSA goons
squads at U.S. airports, all of which has been directed by an
Orwellian Jewish-Catholic "Big Sis" named Janet Napolitano.
This DHS mogul-godmother is promulgating an unnecessary and
wasteful "War on Terror" against the mythical, Mossad-CIA-created
"Al Qaeda." All of this has interesting historical
similarities to Janet Napolitano's totally corrupt Roman Catholic
forebears who once went by the Malleus
Maleficarum witch hunter's manual and burned untold
numbers of women at the stake based upon scientifically unsupportable
assumptions. Catholics
tend to come more from Alpine and Mediterranean Caucasian racial
stock of central and southern Europe where survival meant executing
routine, unimaginative, and stereotyped farming operations consistently
and well. It also meant making a special effort to getting along
with drinking pals at the local pub, who are a potent source
of social intelligence and a conduit of rewards from people
with power. Therefore, in the Catholic world politics and dogma
typically trumps operational performance and the ability to
bluntly address objective reality. It is more about getting
along to go along. This is why we should not be terribly surprised
that the Catholic Church often preferred to burn scientists
like Bruno at the stake rather than listen to newfangled ideas
about the earth revolving around the sun which conflicted with
Catholic earth-centric dogma. Because of their subservient and
obedient nature, it is not uncommon for political cartoonists
to associate Catholics with animals that have had enough hunter
instinct bred out of them so that they are now thoroughly domesticated,
like dogs and sheep. In fact, the Catholic Church openly refers
to its own members as sheep and its bishops carry sheep staffs.
How ironic that the word "dogma" contains the word
"dog," since the underlying nature of Catholicism
seems to be well-endowed with both qualities. Jewish
survival has very much involved learning how to live by ones
wits in a war of man against man, where for most of Jewish evolutionary
history Jews have lived in small colonies as aliens among host
societies in highly urbanized areas in multi-racial, multi-cultural,
Asiatic and southern European fleshpot civilizations, trading
with gentiles, but almost never intermarrying with them and
always remaining a "people apart." The Talmud forbids
manual labor, and the Jewish world has always been heavily focused
on middleman-type business that have a strong emphasis on manipulation
and group coalition formation tactics. The Jewish world has
always been more focused on transactions and psychological manipulation
than achieving excellence in craftsmanship in the creation of
real and useful things. Jews have always also been disproportionately
involved in organized crime and high level confidence schemes
that exploit the credulity of their hosts. Because of their
peculiar relationship with host societies, and their heavy reliance
on deception, manipulation, and passive aggressive stealth tactics,
it is not uncommon for political cartoonists to associate Jews
with parasitic or particularly cruel, vicious, treacherous,
subterranean, stealthy, or poisonous animals such as spiders,
rats, octopi, snakes, sharks, and weasels. All
of this leads up to another important point, namely that the
evolutionary history of a people often makes them "prisoners"of
their genes on both a group social performance level as well
as on an individual level . A good clue to what may help a group
achieve peak performance is analogous to the paleo-diet concept,
where eating unrefined foods without preservatives that largely
replicates the diet of ones Stone Age ancestors has been proven
to be an important component to balanced and optimal nutrition.
Since
Norwegians have evolved in a homogenous dispersed tribal environment
with a distinctive Nordic folk culture, and where technological
success has been an important component to their survival, one
can begin to grasp how applying the paleo-diet concept on a
sociological level implies maintaining very different social
and political policies in Norway than what might be preferred
by Jews and Catholics in their own territories. In fact, in
the ten years I spent living in New York City following my graduation
from business school, where I had quite a lot of interaction
with Jewish, Catholic, and Nordic groups on both a social and
professional level, I observed that in dense urban environments
like New York City, Scandinavians have numerous sociological
problems in preventing groups like Jews and Catholics from ganging
up on them, squeezing them out, and taking over once their Scandinavian
resourcefulness has produced enough positive things for other
groups to want to loot. Scandinavians
have to consciously come to grips with the real character of
alien peoples like Jews and Catholics and consciously develop
group strategies to defend their interests against them, because
there is very little in their indigenous culture that prepares
them to handle this threat. A major reason for this is that
for most of their evolutionary history they have had to deal
with problems involving fishing and agriculture and cold winters
in rural settings where they have functioned mostly on an individualized,
family, or clan level. There simply were no Jews and Catholics
around who were applying sophisticated "rat-dog" gangster
tactics against them in urbanized settings. It is hard to adapt
to something on an evolutionary level if it simply never existed
throughout most of ones evolutionary environment. In fact, Nordic
peoples are legendary for projecting their honest, altruistic,
and rationalistic tendencies on to alien peoples, which is a
major basis for their equally legendary naïveté. One
might ask why Norwegians should ever be forced to adapt to nasty
alien things inside their own territory if they don't have to.
Not all imports are good, just like the introduction of syphilis
and mosquitoes to the Hawaiian islands. Isn't a major reason
why people form their own nations with their own borders is
to protect their own people from nasty and alien things that
can now be kept outside? This is certainly a major
reason why Jews and Jesuits were barred from Norway in the Norwegian
Constitution of 1814. The
simplest solution for Norwegians is to continue as much as possible
with the kind of social and political environment that has worked
for them over the last several thousand years. This means retaining
a homogeneous Nordic society and distinctive, free-thinking
and free-spirited Nordic folk culture. In fact, based upon my
first hand experiences with Nordic peoples (as well as Jews,
Catholics, Muslims and other peoples) in New York City and elsewhere
in America, I am not sure that there realistically are any alternatives
to this course of action that will stop the stealth genocide
of Nordic peoples that is already taking place. To put it bluntly,
Norwegians need for Norway to be their own "tribal reservation"
just like most other indigenous peoples who also require their
own territory. In fact, I am now convinced that Nordic peoples
find multiculturalism and multiracialism to be innately toxic.
Certainly more so than Catholics, who tend to come from more
polyglot southern European societies, and mostly definitely
true in regard to Jews. Once overdosed with a certain levels
of "New World Order" toxicity, Nordic societies start
going into dysfunctional shutdown, analogous to the way Panda
bears stop mating in Zoo environments if they are not kept close
enough to their natural environment, to include maintaining
the presence of bamboo trees. (This is also true of other "king
predator" animals brought into captivity such as wolves
and bears who tend to become very unhappy and neurotic when
they have lost their freedom). Hence, a desire to preserve the
Norwegian people ultimately has nothing to do with being "anti-Jewish"
or "anti-Catholic" or "anti-Muslim" or "anti-"
anything else per se, but rather has everything to do with recognizing
the peculiar innate constraints placed upon Nordic society by
virtue of their unique evolutionary history. Other
Americans besides myself view Catholics as being highly authoritarian,
as noted in the article Is
America Anti-Catholic?:
Alan
Cooperman reports
in today’s Washington Post [23 May 2002] that
"anti-Catholic attitudes, including a belief that Roman
Catholics are not permitted to think for themselves, are common
in the United States, according to a survey released today
by the Rev. Andrew Greeley, a priest, sociologist and best-selling
author." A
rather surprising discovery, one might think. But what does
Greeley see as constituting anti-Catholicism? Cooperman offers
the following examples: "The survey of 550 non-Catholic
Americans, conducted in March, found that 73 percent believed
that Catholics ‘do what the pope and the bishops tell
them to do,’ with 52 percent saying that Catholics ‘really
are not permitted to think for themselves.’"
The
current Pope Ratzinger, himself a former Hitler Youth member,
born in Bavaria Germany. The Vatican controls, and is linked
directly to the European Central Bank, IMF,
Former Nazi bank – the Bank
of International Settlements (BIS), Goldman Sachs, The
Rothschild Financial dynasty, the corrupt Fascist (fasces)
Global Financial System and the offshore Central Mafia Bankster
Cartel. The current Governor of California, Schwarzenegger
is an Austrian Zionist who’s father was a member of
the Austrian Nazi Party, is financed by Lord Jacob Rothschild
and is a self confessed lover of Hitler and dictator rule.
Henri Kissinger were responsible as architects of foreign
policy for many years and formulated acts of genocide
and war crimes around the world. Henri Kissinger
was born Heinz Alfred Kissinger in Fürth, Bavaria, to
a family of German Jews. Do you see where we are heading,
the Fourth Reich.
Sheeple
Heil!
The
web page "Summary
of Key Findings" at pewforum.org, dated October 2011,
claims that Catholics comprise only 23.9% of Americans, and
total Protestant membership is at 51.3%. Seemingly this would
suggest there is nothing to worry about regarding any possible
Catholic "takeover conspiracies." However, other facts
tell a different story. According
to Catholic
growth in influence in America, a blog posting at godlikeproductions.com/forum1
under the heading "Re: Cynthia McKinney outs the 99% Zionist
Jewish Control of D.C":
Religious Affiliation of the U.S. Supreme Court
John Roberts (Chief Justice)... Catholic
Stephen G. Breyer... Jewish
Ruth Bader Ginsburg..Jewish
Anthony M. Kennedy...Catholic
Antonin Scalia.......Catholic
David H. Souter......Episcopalian
John Paul Stevens....Protestant
Clarence Thomas......Catholic
Samuel Alito.........Catholic
Roman Catholic - 24
Presbyterian - 15
Jewish - 13
Methodist and United Methodist - 11
Baptist and Southern Baptist - 10
Interestingly
enough, we see the biggest disparity of Catholics relative to
the general population in the Supreme Court and among state
governors, whereas in the U.S. Senate we do not see this disparity,
however, we do see it among Jews who have 13 co-tribalists in
the Senate compared to somewhere between 3-6% of the total population
(according to many sources it is very hard to get a reliable
estimate of the real Jewish percentage of the total U.S. population
since many Jews become "crypto-Jews" through phony
conversions to Christianity to hide their Jewishness, or fail
to report their real numbers to avoid overly alarming gentiles). As
Michael Collins Piper points out in The
New Jerusalem, the key is to ask who controls the main
strategic choke-points of power, which in a large imperial,
multiracial, multicultural society such as the United States,
means who controls the mainstream media, central bank, and Wall
Street and has the highest net worth. Everyone else, to include
Supreme Court Justices, state governors, and Senators, are almost
like figureheads. Looking at America from Piper's perspective,
we see Jews in the majority almost everywhere at the top. The
next question is to ask who keeps popping up as shills for these
real movers and shakers, and the answer still seems to be the
same as in the late 19th century and early 20th century when
corrupt Jewish-Catholic political machines ran America's biggest
cities. Jews called the shots, and Italian and Irish Catholics
served as their primary front men and muscle. And they still
do. During and after 9/11, Roman Catholic Mayor of New York
City Rudy Giuliani kept things covered up for high level criminals
(see Chapter
29 of my Mission of Conscience series,
where I quote from Webster Tarpley's classic work 9/11 Synthetic
Terror, on page 228, about Giuliani's wise guy tactics).
The Jewish-Roman Catholic Janet Napolitano took over DHS once
arch-Zionist Michael Chertoff was ready to step down and earn
some extra shekels vending airport scanners after the absurdly
phony "Panty Bomber" episode (see Chapter
39). In Chicago, Irish Catholic mayor Richard Daley
was busy hobnobbing with his friends in Israel during 2-4 May
2006 at a time when 9/11 Truth activists were very concerned
that a repeat 9/11 might bring down the Chicago Sears Tower
(later renamed the Willis Tower; please see
Chapter 19 for background on the May Day episode,
and also Chapter
11 and Chapter
35 for an overview of activist campaigns, to include
my Lone Star Iconoclast article and
alert "Chicago Cops Dodge Blagojevich/Sears Tower Investigation").
When it comes to totally corrupt Jewish-Catholic political machines
in America's biggest cities, it just seems like the more things
change, the more they stay the same. This
raises the question about whether many high level Catholics
who are connected with high level Jews still hang on to the
dream of conquering by stealth or false flag attacks what the
Spanish Armada who faced Sir Francis Drake in the English Channel
failed to accomplish. Or are they trying to also complete the
unfinished work of the Catholic Armies in Germany who faced
Gustavus Adolphus, the great Swedish "Lion of the North"
and "Father of Modern Warfare." Or would they also
like to complete the conquest of the Ukraine and Russia for
Catholicism, a project once thwarted by such great Russian and
Ukrainean heroes such as Bohdan
Khmelnytsky (referred to by some historians as the "George
Washington of the Ukraine") and Alexander Nevsky? One
wonders if the same dogmatic intolerance that once motivated
French Catholics to mass murder the Cathars and Huguenots in
the name of religion, and then later genocide the Vendee in
the name of the French Revolutionary State, might resurface
some day, if only Protestants become so weak as "counterpredators"
that they can no longer keep these latent "predators"
in check. Primal authoritarian Catholic urges that were openly
expressed in religious form in the 17th century have not completely
gone away, in fact, in a secular age these tendencies tend to
simply come back in some secular form. I have observed quite
a few intellectuals with a "Catholic" background try
to act as libertarians, and even here I see them dogmatically
push "individual freedom and expression" to absurd
limits. As an additional irony, this can generate so much moral
chaos and social instability over time that it can later be
used as a justification for authoritarian intervention by more
traditional Catholics who favor enormous restrictions on personal
liberties. When
we start looking at disturbing demographic trends in America,
and the physical anthropological characteristics of groups which
are now growing in power, these kinds of concerns become even
more palpable. First,
let us start with demographic decline of Nordics relative to
whites in America, a process that has been slowly but steadily
taking place since the mid-19th, and which has accelerated with
the steady decline of the white population relative to the overall
population of the United States since the mid-1960. On my Libertarianism
vs. Nationalism web page, I note the following:
Regarding
racial nationalism and libertarianism, there is a strong
element of "libertarianism" in the DNA of certain
European populations, with the greatest concentrations in
Nordic peoples, as explained in Appendix
I and Appendix
IV of my Iceland series. In Chapter
III: The Nordic North of Racial
Realities in Europe, Dr. Lothrop Stoddard stated
clearly that he believed that only Nordics have demonstrated
the capability to maintain viable republican and parliamentary
systems for any extended period. An important reason why
America is turning into a police state is the fact that
over the last one hundred and fifty years, the Nordic or
Nordic-Celtic percentage of the white population has declined
from over 60% to less than 20%, while at the same time getting
usurped in power centers by innately criminal Jews and innately
authoritarian Catholic-Alpine peoples. One
rough rule of thumb for Nordic decline can be found in the
reduction in the number of people with blue eyes, since
this is a recessive genetic characteristic commonly found
among Nordics that quickly becomes submerged when they interbreed
with other peoples. According to the Wikipedia article on
eye color:
A 2002 study found that the prevalence
of blue eye color among Caucasians in the United States
to be 33.8 percent for those born from 1936 through 1951
compared with 57.4 percent for those born from 1899 through
1905. Blue eyes have become increasingly rare among American
children, with only one out of every six or 16.6%, which
is 49.8 million out of 300 million (22.4% of white Americans)
of the total United States population having blue eyes.
The plunge in the past few decades has taken place at a
remarkable rate. A century ago, 80 percent of people married
within their ethnic group. Blue eyes were routinely passed
down, especially among people of Western and Northern European
ancestry.
To
maintain genuinely libertarian social and political institutions,
Nordic countries have to maintain the Nordic integrity of
their gene pools. They also have to maintain Nordic control
of the strategic bases of their societies, such as media,
banking, military, government, religion. A strong libertarian-populist
movement in Nordic countries can serve as a watchdog against
high level Zionist infiltration and corruption, such as
the "Pots and Pans Revolution" in Iceland that
exposed many high level malefactors. In addition, by maintaining
a Nordic leadership elite that shares the same ethnicity
as the working class, it is more likely that the leaders
will have a long term sense of stakeholdership and will
have more vision and discipline about bringing into fruition
long term industrial development plans that benefit society
as a whole, rather than engaging in speculative financial
operations that risk looting the country for the benefit
of the power elite only.
From
the perspective of behavioral and ethnic "ecology,"
Mossad-CIA-MI6 "predator's" never would have dared
to "false flag" a Nordic homeland were it not for
the fact that WASPs have become so weak in America as "counter-predators".
From my
Reconciling Libertarianism and Nationalism web page,
I note that:
..On a more subtle level, just because a particular topic
is totally taboo in current public discussion does not prevent
it from remaining a very real factor in human affairs. For
example, one taboo topic remains Protestant vs. Catholic
conflict, supposedly rendered a "non-issue" by
the "melting pot" and enlightened rationalist
instruction in our public schools long ago. Yet in big cities
like New York, Chicago, and Boston, Italian and Irish Catholics
often ally themselves with Jews against WASPs. As
Dr. Lothrop Stoddard explained in his landmark 1924 work
Racial
Realities in Europe, one reason why this conflict
is unlikely to ever completely go away is that "Protestantism"
has had a high historical correlation with "Nordics"
and closely related Celts, whereas "Catholicism"
has had a much higher correlation with other types of Celtic,
Mediterranean, and Alpine branches of Caucasian peoples
--and each group has distinctive cognitive, temperamental,
and emotional characteristics embedded in their DNA that
can make "getting along" tricky on certain social,
political, and economic issues. Among other things, "Alpines"
as a group tend to be much more authoritarian and dogmatic
compared to "Nordics," who tend to be more adventurous,
individualistic, rationalistic, emotionally distant (often
interpreted or misinterpreted by others as "arrogance")
and entrepreneurial. (See more discussion by Dr. Stoddard
in Appendix
I of Part
6 of my Iceland
Gets "ENRONed" series, as well as
in the "Handling Real Nazis" section of Chapter
34 of the Mission of Conscience series.)
After
reading Racial
Realities in Europe, one might get the impression
that the policy of forcefully entangling Nordics with other
types of whites within the context of the "pluralistic"
American empire has been a long term sociological disaster.
It has actually reversed the process in which Nordics
separated themselves on a social and political
as well as theological level from other whites in Europe
during the Protestant Reformation, or later separated themselves
from the British Empire during the American War of Independence.
Today
"federalism" has become America's omnipresent
secular state religion, and the U.S. Government -- disproportionately
influenced by Jews at the top and non-Nordics everywhere
else -- has taken on all the corrupt, totalitarian, dogmatic,
and inefficient characteristics of the Catholic Church that
Martin Luther protested against in the 16th century. The
Catholic Church of the late Middle Ages had become a totally
corrupt rent-seeking
operation masquerading as a religion, and today the U.S.
Government, intertwined with a nexus of military-industrial-central
banking-big corporate interests, Mossad-CIA, and the Jewish
Lobby, are all essentially just a governmental and special
interest version of the same thing. Both systems were supported
on the backs of large masses of gullible, petty people with
a lowly peasant mentalities who were incapable of acting
as the intelligent counter predators necessary to keep tyrannical
predators in check. Reminiscent
of the "witch-hunts
and wars of religion and imperial conquest"
once promoted by the 16th and 17th century Catholic Church,
Mossad-CIA today creates false flag terror attacks, Guantanamo
torture, the Al Qaeda boogeyman (see Chapter
12), and the destruction of civil liberties
at home. Meanwhile, in the Gulf of Mexico, the Rothschild-controlled
oil company British Petroleum has exercised
its "Divine
Right" to control
the Obama Administration, violate virtually
all safety standards, manipulate
major media and local police, and shorten
the lives of millions of Americans (let
them eat cake!) by flaunting prohibitions against using
the highly toxic dispersant Corexit. If
old northern European heroes and heroines who fought for
political decentralization and human liberty in the face
of "New World Order" threats of their era could
turn in their graves, then Arminius,
Martin
Luther, Queen
Elizabeth I of England, and Gustavus
Adolfus would probably be running high RPM right now.
Don't forget Thomas Jefferson either, who once created an
Anglo-Saxon grammar book to help Anglo-Americans regain
a greater sense of their roots, and later in life stated
that peoples from northern Europe were better suited for
republican government than people from southern Europe.
(See. Elena
Kagan and the Decline of WASP America by Kevin
MacDonald, Ph. D, The Nationalist Times, May 2010,
for more on what happens when Jews and their minions displace
WASPs). In
spirit, if not in actual public statements, the current
phony "War on Terror," and creation of the "Homeland
Security" apparatus (currently run by a Catholic of
probable Jewish descent named Janet
Napolitano, and formerly by a Jew named Michael
Chertoff who turned loose the 9/11
"dancing Israelis" and "art students"
and has been a major profiteer
on cancer-causing airport body scanners) and the Federally-controlled,
militarized police state (see Chapter
31 of the Mission of Conscience series), might
be interpreted as a devious Jewish-Catholic effort to further
marginalize and even ultimately eliminate WASP influence
in America, just as initial 16th and 17th century Protestant
gains got wiped out in France and Austria in the animated
map below.
Wikipedia caption from article The
Protestant Reformation: "Reformation and Counter
Reformation in Europe. Protestant lands in blue (with
gains and the losses due to the Counter Reformation),
Catholic
in olive."
There
was nothing accidental about the Protestant roll-back depicted
above. For example, as part of the Counter Reformation,
the Pope created the Jesuits who took a personal loyalty
oath to their temporal maximum leader, underscoring an authoritarian
theme that would later be echoed in the 20th century. According
to "Fascism,
Sequel to Communism:"
Hitler's
feared SS troops and the Gestapo were also closely connected
with the Jesuits. Hitler referred to Himmler, who headed
the SS, as "our Ignatius of Loyola." The SS's
black uniforms were based on the Jesuits' robes and many
Jesuits participated in the SS - including Himmler's uncle
who was a senior SS officer and a Jesuit priest. The SS
skull and cross bones also appears at the ceremony of
the Jesuit oath
...Therefore
to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine
and His Holiness's right and custom against all usurpers
of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially
the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden
and Norway, and the now pretended authority and Churches
of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now
established in Ireland and on the continent of America
and elsewhere and all adherents in regard that they may
be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church
of Rome... ...will
unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may
receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope...
Chapter
5 ofthe Mission of Conscience
series contains an important historical example of a particularly
horrible Jewish-Catholic Alliance. An excerpt from the lecture
"The
Fall of Poland" by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson
describes how a partnership between a corrupted Polish Catholic
nobility and Jewish middlemen reduced the Polish people
into the worst form of slavery in Europe during the 16th-17th
centuries. More often than not, Jews manipulated the nobility
rather than the other way around. During
this dark period, 80% of the world's Jewish population moved
to the Polish empire, which became not only "The New
Jerusalem," but also a prototype for the kind of "New
World Order" tyranny that Jews would later try to fasten
on to the United States and entire world. What
Would It Take? by Edmund Connelly, Occidental
Observer, 15 July 2010 makes the point that things
could go from bad to worse when white Americans -- on track
to become an absolute minority in a couple of decades--
could become extermination targets, just as millions of
whites have already been driven
into poverty and starvation in South Africa under black
rule. Given
the seriousness of this overall situation, Alex Jones is
not doing his audiences a favor when he fails to inform
them regarding the racial motivations behind anti-WASP marginalization
in particular, and anti-White genocide in general, by an
alien power elite. Nor is he helping European Americans
when he fails to inform them about the richness of their
own indigenous European roots that they could draw upon
for strength and cohesion in the battle for survival ahead. At
root, there is a very simple biological explanation behind
America's trend towards unfettered globalism and the police
state within American borders. It all started when WASP's
once ran this country in the 19th century and created the
highly prosperous infrastructure of universities and "home
garage middle class tinkerers" that promoted scientific
and technological advancement. They also created political
institutions that protected individual liberty. Much of
this was based upon the innate individualism of Nordic or
closely related Celtic peoples like the Puritans, Anglo-Saxons,
Scandinavians, Scottish, and Scots-Irish. These peoples
are noted for their legendary "Faustian spirit"
that glorifies scientific as well as geographic exploration. Then
in poured Catholics and Jews from stagnant, corrupt societies
in Southern and Eastern Europe. Initially, they all felt
profound inferiority complexes in the face of impressive
WASP achievements, where America once led the world in inventiveness
and was on track to have a greater industrial base than
France, Germany, and Britain combined. The Catholics and
Jews engaged in "adaptive mimicry," assuming enough
WASP values (superficially at least) to aid their rise to
the top. Over time, they incrementally exploited their political
(and even criminal mafia) organization to edge more individualized
WASPs out of the strategic power bases of American society. Flash
forward today, and Jews and Catholic are so firmly in the
saddle that they think they have everything under control
(we even have a Jewish-Catholic head of the Orwellian-sounding
"Department of Homeland Security" named Janet
Napolitano ), and WASPs are a dispensable commodity that
can be sneered at, marginalized, and even disposed of. Catholics
and Jews now take for granted the subtle "loose-tight"
temperamental characteristics more commonly found among
WASP's ("loose-tight" --a term frequently used
in In
Search of Excellence by Waterman and Peters --
means a talent for finding the right balance between "centralized"
and "decentralized decision-making processes based
on upon particular situations). "Adaptive mimicry"
soon becomes replaced with"chip-on-the-shoulder"
arrogance, and the innate crookedness of Jews and innate
authoritarianism of Catholics works its way to the surface.
We now see the same shameless "rent-seeking" and
"feather-bedding" mentality in bloated federal
bureaucracies (disproportionately filled with Jews and Catholics)
that exploit the phony "War on Terror" that Americans
once saw in spades in a much earlier era in American history
with "Jewish
lightning" in Brooklyn, "Kosher Nostra"
racketeering in Las Vegas, and vulgar grubbing Irish Catholic
"patronage" political machines in Chicago. Not
surprisingly, as WASP's are being liquidated through their
low reproductive rates, and inability to defend their ethnic
as well as geographic "territory," America is
assuming all the stagnant and corrupt characteristics of
the societies that many Catholics and Jews originally came
from in the 19th century. America increasingly looks more
like southern Italy, back alley Dublin, and Israel (rated
by many sources as more corrupt than most European countries)
and less and less like Scandinavia and Merry Olde England. In
the long run, social analysis is really fairly simple. As
the Jewish British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once
observed in the 19th century, "In the long run, it
is all racial." (Check out the "Bioresponse"
chart elsewhere on the Reconciling Libertarianism and Nationalism
web page created by Harvard professor Edward Wilson where
he conceptualizes "group genetic response" as
a "Log 10 [seconds]" mathematical evolutionary
function across time). Human
tribalism and innate differences in productivity between
human groups are fundamental facts of life that will never
go away. In the long run, it is far wiser to deal with these
things out in the open than to try to suppress them. In
fact, by allowing Jews and Catholics to engage in "adaptive
mimicry" to get the upper hand over them, one might
say that WASP's "trained the dog to bite them."
Worse yet, they have allowed Jewish-controlled media monopoly
allied with forms of government coercion to forcefully integrate
WASPs with Jews and Catholics so thoroughly throughout all
areas of American society that Catholic and Jewish deficiencies
are now WASP problems, whether WASPs deserve these problems
or not on their own. When Jews and Catholics do insanely
criminal, authoritarian, or stupid things and go down, they
automatically pull WASPs down with them. In retrospect,
it was incredibly foolish for WASPs to expose the fate of
their children and all future generations to the shaky results
of anarcho-libertarian "dog training" applied
to alien peoples...
Our
next step is to explore scientific explanations from physical
anthropological viewpoint regarding why America's real rulers
may feel such a deep instinctive hatred towards WASPs that
they may feel a hidden urge to kill them through false flag
attacks both at home (like 9/11 or the Ft. Hood shootings)
or abroad (like London 7/7 or Norway 7-22) as well as implement
economic policies that completely impoverish them. As documented
on my Leuren
Moret archive and Fukushima
web pages, they even feel an urge to savagely reduce a
large percentage of the earth's population through radiation
warfare, false
flag pandemics, and other nefarious means. We are talking
about some extremely evil and dangerous people at
the very highest levels. I
have reproduced below links to most of the table of contents
of the special issue of The Barnes Review titled
The Revenge of the Neanderthal. I have also reproduced
my discussion in Appendix
VI: The Revenge of the Neanderthal, Ethnic-Genetic Distance,
and the Neanderthal-Troll Connection contained
in Part
6 of my Iceland
Gets "ENRONed," Then Goes For "1776"
series. I
think that after reviewing this information, the reader will
agree that we have extremely serious social problems that
must be addressed and resolved as soon as possible.
The
following are some sample articles that explain the
Neanderthal background of Jews, raising the question
about whether Jews are simply continuing a race war
"by other means" that has been going on
for tens of thousands of years between Neanderthals
and Cro Magnon Man. For a complete list of articles,
please visit the Table
of Contents of the May/June 2010 special issue
of The Barnes Review.
REVENGE
OF THE NEANDERTHAL by Willis A. Carto,
"The truth about the Neanderthal is a historical
web that is finally being untangled. . . ."
ISRAELI
SAYS: “WE WERE INVENTED”
by Willis Carto, "An eminent Israeli historian
says the perceived origin of the Jewish people is
anything but true. . . ."
‘MY
ANCESTORS WERE NEANDERTHALS’ by
Willis Carto, " Jewish scholar Stan Gooch has
written extensively on the Neanderthal origins of
today’s people known as `the Jews.'”
PARTING
THOUGHTS: THE ETERNAL CONFLICT by George
Kadar, "...The 20th century in the Western world
can be rightfully called the "Century of the
Neanderthal" and it is up to us to stop this
process."
The ethnic-genetic
distance concept:
Throughout
history people have tended to practice the axiom that as ethnic-genetic
distance decreases, the chances for altruistic and mutualistic
behavior tends to increase. Conversely, as ethnic-genetic
distance increases, the chances of predatory or parasitic
behavior also tends to increase, all other things being held
equal. See the article "Zoological
Subspecies in Man" by Dr. Raymond Hall which explains
how this behavior is not only common among homo sapiens,
but virtually all other mammalian species. Therefore, this
behavior is the instinctive result of evolutionary forces
common throughout nature. If
one knows where to look, one can find anthropologists like
the late Sir Arthur Keith who wrote A New Theory of Evolution
that explained why "tribalism," or the maintenance
of "Evolutionary Breeding Units," is adaptive social
behavior for natural environments. The
most unnatural environments created by man are typically
cities. Interestingly enough, for over 2,500 years, the Jews
have been one of the most urbanized peoples on this planet.
Not surprisingly, it is common to hear people who have come
to know the Jews well in big cities (as I have) criticize
them as being one of the most "unnatural" peoples
on this planet, heavily divorced from "healthy instincts"
(Jews are typically overly represented in highly perverse
social and political organizations, ranging from the North
American Man-Boy Love Association to the Communist Party;
the British historian Arnold Toynbee called them a "fossil
civilization;" Jews are over-represented around the world
at the highest levels of organized crime, and make up the
majority of traitors caught spying against America) and are
strongly attracted to ideological manipulation as an end itself
(the "brokerage mentality" described in Winning
Through Intimidation by Robert Ringer; see also The
Painted Word by Tom Wolfe about how Jews like modern
art more for its ideological statement than anything to do
with aesthetics). See "The
Scam of Modern Art" by Willis Carto and my own discussion
of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my mutualism
vs. parasitism article. While
Jews are famous for being extremely tribalistic among their
own kind, they tend to encourage the exact opposite behavior
among gentiles. In fact, Jews tend to encourage unnatural
relationships among gentiles both in terms of unnatural divisions
and unnatural alliances. They encourage unnatural divisions
by supporting feminism, which encourages animosity between
men and women, and Marxist class warfare, which stirs up unnecessary
strife between people of shared race, ethnicity and nationality.
Jews also like to promote unnatural alliances by encouraging
interracial marriage, multi-racial immigration, miscegenation,
and homosexuality. Once
Jews are allowed to thoroughly work their influence on a gentile
society, it's social fabric is typically severely ruptured
on all levels. Its overall level of social and economic efficiency
tends to decline to Third World levels. This seems to be the
story of America in the last few decades. The
following are some key articles on the ethnic-genetic interest
concept:.
Interestingly
enough, even Jewish-controlled sources like the New York
Times host articles that explain Jewish genetic similarities
among each other, and distance from gentiles, such as "Studies
Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity" by Nicholas
Wade, NYT, June 9, 2010:
The
shared genetic elements suggest that members of any Jewish
community are related to one another as closely as are fourth
or fifth cousins in a large population, which is about 10
times higher than the relationship between two people chosen
at random off the streets of New York City, Dr. Atzmon said.
Ashkenazic
and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry,
with most of the rest from the Middle East, the two surveys
find. The two communities seem very similar to each other
genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated
for so long.
In
Chapter 14: "Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and Claims
of Jewish Superiority" of his book Jewish Supremacism,
Dr. David Duke provides insight into how Jews reflect enormous
genetic distance from white gentile populations. Jews are
able to compensate for these differences to some extent by
engaging in various forms of behavioral and superficial genetic
adaptive mimicry:
...The
first thing I found was information on the set of genetically
borne diseases that occur almost exclusively in the Jewish
community, such as Tay-Sachs disease. Their presence certainly
indicated a genetic variance specific to the Jewish population
and illustrated a genetic difference from the Gentiles.
Soon I found scientific papers dealing precisely with the
issues I sought. [footnote 628, 629] Genetic
researchers Sachs and Bat-Miriam discovered amazing similarity
between the Jewish populations of nine countries of North
Africa, the Middle East, and Central Europe. Conversely,
they found sharp differences between Jews and non-Jews from
those same countries. [footnote 630] In
studying blood group data, Mourant, Kopec, and Doma-
niewska-Sobczak wrote in a book called The Genetics of the
Jews that it may be said that, in general, blood group data…support
the relative homogeneity of the main historical Jewish communities.
[footnote 631] Now,
here we have mainstream Jewish anthropologists and geneticists
-- the same groups who chronically preach to us that there
are no great differences between Blacks and Whites -- boldly
assert that the Jewish people are genetically distinctive
and relatively homogenous! They argue that some differences
exist between the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim (the main
ethnic division among Jews), but that essentially Jews are
a single people with a limited genetic resemblance to the
European populations among whom they dwell. [foonote
632]
•
In blood group data, two major studies, one in 1977 by Bonné-
Tamir, Ashbel, and Kenett and one by Karlin, Kenett, and
Bonné-Tamir in 1979, found when using fourteen polymorphic
loci, no significant difference in Jewish populations from
Iraq, Libya, Germany, or Poland. They estimated that the
genetic distance between Gentiles and Jews living in the
same area is three to five times
[Top of page] 330 [chapter title] JEWISH EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY
greater than for
Jews living in the different nations studied. In the 1977
study, the researchers state “not much admixture has
taken place between Ashkenazi Jews and their Gentile neighbors
during the last 700 years or so.” [footnote
633, 634]
•
Mille and Kobyliansky discovered in studies of dermatologlyphic
data that Ashkenazim (Eastern European Jews) are much more
similar to Sephardim (Middle-Eastern and European Jews)
than they are to the non-Jewish Eastern Europeans. [footnote
635]
•
Kobyliansky and Livshits in using cluster analysis on 25
morphological characteristics, estimated that Jews in Russia
were six times more distant from Russians than Russians
were from Germans. They also found the Jews to be completely
separate from the twenty-four other ethnic groups studied
in Russia, Germany, and Poland.
[footnote 636]
•
Another study compared modern Jews and those of 3,000-year-old
Jewish skeletons discovered in the Middle East. Sofaer,
Smith, and Kaye studied dental morphology from Morocco,
Kurdish Iraq, and Eastern European countries. They found
more likeness between the widely scattered Jewish populations
than for the Gentile groups living near them. The ancient
Jewish skeletal group turned out to be far more similar
to the three Jewish populations than for every non-Jewish
group studied except for one, an Arab Druse group from the
11th century. [footnote 637]
One
researcher summed up the overall genetic differences by
saying that there was probably at least three times more
genetic difference between an average Jew in France and
his Gentile Frenchman neighbor than between an average French
Jew and a Jew living in Russia or the Middle East. The
Jewish studies amazed me. I would not have guessed that
Jews were that genetically different from all Europeans.
I knew a few Jews who were indistinguishable from the potpourri
of other European-Americans. From their appearance, it seemed
impossible that there was three times more genetic difference
from us than from Jews in remote regions of the world. But,
the research proved that a wide genetic difference existed
between Jew and European. I wondered why they did not seem
that dramatically different in their appearance. Fritz
Lenz suggested back in the 1930s that Jewish resemblance
to the European populations did not mean that their genes
were similar.638 He suggested that their similar external
resemblance could have emerged from the natural selection
of genes within the Jewish gene pool. These genes could
simply be a small cluster of genes that lay dormant in the
Jewish pool or that were introduced by limited genetic mixture
with Gentiles, and which then were selectively favored by
the social environment. Genes that caused a greater corporeal
resemblance to that of the Gentile host could have favorable
results in acceptance, accumulation of wealth, as well as
social advancement leading to reproductive success.
[Book title] JEWISH SUPREMACISM
[top of page] 331
By
a somewhat similar process, distinct species of butterflies
not closely related, come to resemble one another without
narrowing their genetic distance. A very small set of genes
influencing appearance within the Jewish population could
thus be favored, causing a greater similarity of appearance
to the Gentile population while not narrowing their overall
genetic alienation from their host population. Over many generations,
the external resemblance to Gentiles could increase while
the parts of the brain that affect behavioral tendencies and
abilities could be unaffected. According
to evolutionary genetics, it is possible that Jews have come
to more resemble their hosts in their external appearance
while at the same time becoming even more distant in their
mental and behavioral characteristics. Whatever the questions
of physical appearance, there seemed little doubt that Jews
are indeed very different from Europeans and that they had
maintained that genetic difference for a very long time. I
also ran across a number of popular sources arguing that high
Jewish-Gentile intermarriage rates would end their genetic
distinctiveness from European Gentiles. As in so many other
matters dealing with the Jews, there is a wealth of information
on the issue, an underlying reality that is very different
from popular perceptions.
Jews = Hybridized Neanderthals
= Troll Relatives?
Interestingly
enough, quite a few sources on the Internet explain how it
is very likely that Troll mythology among northern European
peoples evolved from pockets of Neanderthal peoples that were
later overtaken by immigrations of Nordic and Celtic peoples.
Hence, the recent attacks on Iceland via Zionists such as
the Rothschild-controlled City of London, George Soros, and
Goldman Sachs might be viewed as a "Troll attack"
on a Nordic nation.
...In
the genre of paleofiction, the distinguished Swedish-speaking
Finnish paleontologist Björn Kurtént has entertained
the theory (e.g. in Dance
of the Tiger) that trolls are a distant memory
of an encounter with Neanderthals by our Cro-Magnon ancestors
some 40,000 years ago during their migration into northern
Europe. Spanish paleoanthropologist Juan Luis Arsuaga provides
evidence for these types of encounters in his book, The
Neanderthal's Necklace. The theory that Neanderthals
and Cro-Magnons occupied the same area of Europe at the
same time in history has been theorized based on fossil
evidence. Other researchers believe that they just refer
to neighboring tribes. The problem with this theory is that
neither Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons existed in this part
of Europe during the ice-age. Most of Scandinavia was covered
by a large glacier and the area was not occupied until much
later.
My
response to the "problem with this theory" cited
by this author above is that Ice sheets have advanced and
retreated multiple times over the last 50,000 years. There
could be pockets of Neanderthal tribes that survived even
into the historic era throughout northern Europe, just as
there are tiny pockets of somewhat blond-haired and blue-eyed
peoples who have survived in various places in Central Asia
in places like Afghanistan (for example in Nuristan)
and Iran even though the original populations have been repeatedly
overrun and colonized by alien peoples. Lastly, people can
import mythologies with their migrations from other geographic
areas. For example, the Jan/Feb
2007 Barnes Review carried an article "The
Baltic Origins of Homer’s Epics" which argued that
"Here is compelling evidence that the events of Homer's
Iliad and Odyssey took place in the Baltic and not the Mediterranean.
Reveals how a climate change forced the migration of a people
and their myth to ancient Greece and identifies the true geographic
sites of Troy and Ithaca in the Baltic Sea and Calypso’s
Isle in the North Atlantic Ocean—following Homer’s
own geographic descriptions."' A
Pravda
discussion forum thread web page has the following entry
under "Re: Neanderthals" discusses evidence for
Neanderthals in Finland:
English
summaries 3/2000
Signs
of Neanderthal man unearthed in Finland by Juha Valste and
Antti Halkka
Pages
4-11
For
a long time, the oldest known signs of people in Finland post-dated
the latest Ice Age, making them less than 10,000 years old.
Now, at Susiluola, in Kristiinankaupunki, western Finland,
stone implements and signs of fire have been discovered which
are around 120,000 years old. These indicate that people have
existed here during the Eem interglacial warmer period between
two ice ages. All the human forms as old as these in Central
and southern Europe have been Neanderthals.
Tales
have long been told about Susiluola (it’s name - for
some obscure reason - means "wolf cave" in Finnish).
The old folk were convinced that Susiluola had been inhabited
by mankind sometime during the Stone Age. Recently, a curious
local inhabitant was given permission to excavate the cave.
The National Board of Antiquities had no money to fund this
operation, no available staff, and in fact little interest
in the project.
Digging
deeply into the cave floor deposits, amateur geologists soon
unearthed blackened stones and roughly made stone implements.
They immediately abandoned their project, gracefully making
way for a thorough professional scientific examination of
the cave strata. Thus far, the site has yielded approximately
30 stone implements and over a hundred fragments produced
during their shaping. There are no rock types in the area
from which it would be an easy job to manufacture weapons
and tools. Some of the artifacts have been carved from red
shale.
There
are many layers in the deposits on the cave floor, some of
which constitute original floor surfaces, whereas others have
been built up from stones and earth transported there by either
water or ice. Pollen and spores from trees and other kinds
of plants have been found in the strata associated with human
occupation. These sub-fossils tell us that the climate 120,000
years ago was rather warm, in other words similar to what
it is today.
Susiluola
represents the first Neanderthal dwelling site that has even
been found in Fennoscandia.
Not
unnaturally, it has caused a sensation among anthropologists
and geologists in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark.
The
Wikipedia article on "Trolls"
(as of May 2010) has the following interesting comment:
Many
of the fairytale and folklore descriptions of "Trolls"
are similar to characteristics of Neanderthal people. Neanderthal
people overlapped with us (Homo Sapiens) for 30,000 to 50,000
years.
[Editor's Note: In light of
all this research, perhaps it would be perfectly reasonable
to suggest that on 7-22 Norway got hit with a bona fide troll
attack of the Mossad-Jewish-Neanderthal variety].
APPENDIX
B
Norwegians
and other Scandinavians have always led the world in the
output of technological innovation per capita, just like
their New England counterparts whose "Yankee Ingenuity"
was the prime source of American inventiveness and world-leading
new industries in the 19th century.
Three
Gross Misconceptions
that Too Many Americans (Like Glenn Beck)
Have About Norway and Norwegians
(Including the wise guys at the CIA's
Langley, VA HQ who probably
aided or abetted the Mossad/MI6 side of the Oslo/Utoya attacks)
by William B. Fox
.
. . Continuing with "just one man's opinion"
from a "51% Norwegian," Norwegian - American
perspective, with background Norway-related photos here.
I must emphasize that my views are not officially
connected with or representative of any Norwegian or Norwegian-American
associations. The
mass murder of my Norwegian kinsmen on 7-22 was an unspeakably
evil act of war. This must be avenged, and its
real perpetrators must be publicly identified
and brought to justice!
In
this essay, I will cover the following misconceptions and fallacies:
a) Norway,
being a Nordic country, somehow has "Nazi-like"
characteristics
b) Small countries like Norway and Iceland are "obsolete"
and "anachronistic" in a "globalized"world.
c) "Homogeneity" in a white (particularly
a Nordic) country is somehow reprehensibly "racist,"
economically "irrational," and disruptive to a harmonious,
global order
a) Norway,
being a Nordic country, somehow has "Nazi-like" characteristics
There
are two very good approaches for handling this issue, which
has gained increased relevance after Glenn Beck mistakenly compared
the Norwegian Labor Party conference area on Utoya island with
Hitler Youth camps. (See my listing of articles related to this
episode in the 25-28 July time frame in my Norwegian
Government and Establishment Media Questionable Behavior Patterns
in Part
2 of this series). The
first approach is to note that Nordic peoples have historically
been world leaders in certain key democratic areas such as human
rights and parliamentary government. These are areas that the
America public usually considers antithetical to major characteristics
of Nazism. One
advantage of this approach is that we can explore these antithetical
areas without getting mired in detailed discussions up front
about National Socialist ideology and revisionist histories
of World War II, which inevitably leads to a frank discussion
about Allied/Zionist disinformation as well as the real nature
of "Nazi propaganda." Instead, we can focus on exploring
indigenous Nordic characteristics, a topic which provokes far
less anxiety in most audiences. In
addressing fellow Americans, a first major point I would like
to make is that "Nordic" is not as foreign as it may
originally sound. In fact, in early America, "Nordic"
was "down home." I
have mentioned elsewhere on this web page that the Puritans
who settled New England came from the most Nordic part of England
that was heavily settled by Norwegian and Danish Vikings and
also other Norsemen from other eras. Norway has a charm and
quaintness that is reminiscent of Norman Rockwell paintings
of WASP New England. New Englanders of the colonial period were
anthropologically almost identical to Norwegians; in fact it
striking to me how descriptions of the personalities, values,
and social structure of the original "New England Yankee"
is virtually identical to most characterizations I have run
across of "stereotypical Norwegians." For example,
the article The
Puritan and the Yankee: A long semi-scholarly footnote on a
sentence observes:
Thinking
of Yankee in terms of character traits involves notions of
independence, straightforwardness, integrity, community, responsibility,
the sense that right is right, and a combination of shrewdness
and frugality. The visual representation of the Yankee for
me is in Norman Rockwell's "Freedom of Speech" painting.
The major figure is standing and speaking to the town meeting.
He is not a crusader, nor is it a big deal. He is speaking
his mind and doing it candidly. Emerson's essay on "Self
Reliance" is a literary expression of the Yankee spirit.
It may be that Ben Franklin is a prototype of a Yankee. We
too easily forget that though he came to prominence in Philadelphia,
Franklin lived his formative years in New England. His writings
show the commonsense practicality often associated with the
Yankee mentality.
This
is identical to how I would characterize most Norwegians, or
at least native Nordic Norwegians, and not the miscellaneous
featherless bipeds from Third World countries that have been
allowed into Norway following World War II in the name of multiracialism,
multiculturalism, globalism, and other destructively deceptive
and parasitic Zionist New World Order agendas.
Upper
left:John
Wayne, of Scottish and Scots-Irish descent, played "rugged
individualist" heroic roles that are closer to the Norwegian
character than Glen Beck's comic book conception of Hitler Youth.
In this screen shot from True
Grit, Wayne plays an aging one-eyed U.S. Marshall who can
still fearlessly go after bad guys, reminiscent of the supreme
deity of Norse mythology Odin who trades an eye for wisdom at
the Well
of Mimir and confronts evil Loki
and his army of perverse creatures during Ragnarök
with pure valor. Upper right: Gen
George Patton, of Scots-Irish descent, famous for his brilliant
initiative and controversial outspokenness as well as his outstanding
leadership as a combat general. Below: actor James
Stewart and actress Carroll Baker find
romance along the Ohio River frontier in this publicity photo
from Hollywood's 1962 classic epic How
the West Was Won, aptly characterized by one critic
as "America's answer to Leni
Riefenstahl." Also of Scottish descent, Jimmy Stewart
frequently played heroic America pioneer archetypes reminiscent
of explorers and other adventurers in Norse sagas.
Another
important group we might relate Norwegians to in addition to
Anglo-Saxon/Nordic English are the half Nordic, half Celtic
peoples of Scotland. Norwegians have historically been more
directly involved with Scotland than Germany. Like the Scottish
people, or even the Scots-Irish (WASPs from southern Scotland
who settled in northern Ireland), the Norwegians have a certain
streak of "rugged individualism" as well as "stoicism"
in their character. Since ancient times, "Norse-Gaelic"
communities have existed throughout Scotland and certain areas
of northern England and Ireland, quite a few Scottish communities
(such
as in the Shetland Islands) continue to celebrate their
Norse heritage with festivals even to this day. As
an interesting personal anecdote, while traveling with my parents
in Scotland in the late 1960's, a Scottish business executive
privately confided to my father who was then teaching as a college
professor, "We feel closer to the Norwegians than the British!" If
someone feels that they absolutely must try to compare Norwegians
with hardline warrior figures in some nearby country separated
by an ocean, even if they have to stretch things a bit, people
like Gen.
Douglas MacArthur, Gen.
George Patton (see Born
Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America by James
Webb), William
Wallace (popularized in the movie Braveheart)
or even character actors like John
Wayne (of Scottish and Scots-Irish background) and Jimmy
Stewart (of Scottish descent) who were famous for "playing
themselves" (in real life Stewart became a Brigidier General
in the U.S Air Force Reserves) are all actually a little bit
closer to Norwegians in terms of behavioral characteristics,
heroic culture, social institutions, and ethnic-genetic distance
than Glenn Beck's "comic book" and "Jewish-Hollywood"
level of understanding of "Hitler Youth." In
many respects, Norway is basically a nation of "high-end"
hillbillies and fishermen from the fjord country who have more
in common with the Scots-Irish who contributed a
disproportionate amount of America's earliest
country music (experienced today through such venues as
"Grand
Ole Opry," "Blue
Grass" concerts, and "Austin
City Limits") than anything to do with jackboot brass
bands or, for that matter, Jewish urbanites like George Soros,
Jonathan Pollard, and Bernie Madoff who give America most of
its high level white collar crime, assassinations, espionage,
Stuxnet virus attacks, GMO seed monopolies, toxic vaccine additives,
dysfunctional social re-engineering (I call it "serial
macro-social pedophilia") and other very evil things thing
that are literally poisoning our country -- and others as well.
Back
in 1990's I saw a Norway Times article about a 1950's
antique car club in western Norway, where Norwegian re-enactors
dressed like Marilyn Monroe, James Dean, and other icons of
the "Happy Days" era. Their slogan was "We are
more American than most Americans." I later saw article
about how Icelandic fisherman often make it a point to arrive
at fishing grounds earlier and stay later and in stormier weather
than their British counterparts, even if they lose more people
at sea. They could legitimately claim as fellow adherents to
a heroic seafaring culture that they are "more British
than the British." Similarly Norwegians often try to one-up
the Brits as well, for example if tall ships come into port,
the Norwegians might have their cadets climb up to higher masts
compared to their British counterparts to stand at attention
on the rigging. This reminds me of how the U.S. Marine Corps
makes it a special point to appear more "military"
and "gung ho" than the U.S. Army in just about everything.
It also reminds me of how many Texans take pride in the "Alamo"
and "Lone Star Republic" mystique and view themselves
as tougher "cowboys" and better "fighters"
compared to lesser mortals across the U.S.A. The
History Channel series: Barbarians - The Vikings, has
the following introduction which explains some of Scandinavia's
own unique historical mystique, although I argue in Chapter
34 some of the "barbaric"-related interpretations
contained in the following passage reflect bias by Christian
historians against pagan Norsemen:
Late
in the eighth century, they burst from the frigid seas of
the North, to take the world by storm. For the next three
hundred years, they ravaged the civilized nations. Nothing
can stop them. Not the oceans. Not the dread of the unknown.
Not the rulers of Europe. They are the Vikings, and behind
their barbaric legend lies an even more spectacular reality.
Explorers, settlers, and traders, Vikings strike out across
the sea in search of plunder and legitimate wealth...
Norwegian
Americans have always been disproportionately represented in
dangerous or rough occupations like fishing, lumber jacking,
combat military units, and ranching. It is not uncommon to see
a Norwegian-American test his mettle for kicks, like trying
to do a head stand on high rise construction beam as a steel
worker, or standing on top of a tree five stories off the ground
he has just "topped" as a lumberjack, or trying to
see if he can ride his horse across a natural arch as a cowboy.
It has always been the case that blond-haired, blued-eyed Nordic
women have been vastly over-represented compared to other females
in adventure sports like rock climbing, parachuting, and scuba
diving. Scandinavians have always been a unique blend of both
the athletic and intellectual, excelling in both areas. Scandinavian-Americans
are probably closer to America's original pioneer culture of
the 18th and 19th centuries than most U.S. citizens today, and
in this sense may qualify as "more American than most Americans."
I
have attended quite a few social and business-related meetings
held by Norwegians or Norwegian Americans where one of the lingering
big questions in the back of my mind was "What's the big
deal about `Nordic' peoples"? My initial impression has
been that both Norwegians and Norwegian Americans seem to act
like pretty normal and ordinary people to me, preoccupied with
handling the same kinds of human problems all other Americans
have to deal with. They put their pants on in the morning the
same way as anybody else, and try to avoid the flu bug like
everyone else as well. I have never seen any Hitlerian "Aryan
Superman" stuff going on at any Norwegian or Norwegian
American events.
Then
an idea hit me. One thing that seems to distinguish Norwegians
is not that they are so "superior," but rather they
seem to be a bit more well-rounded and more "normal"
and relatively "less dysfunctional" compared to other
groups. In other words, Norwegians strike me as being more like
super normal rather than like supermen. Interestingly
enough, I once read account by an individual who should have
been an expert on "Nazi Aryan supermen" that helped
validate this perception. It was by Leon DeGrelle, a Belgian
political leader who later became Waffen S.S. General under
Hitler and saw considerable combat on the Eastern Front. He
wrote about his experiences in Norway in Campaign
in Russia. When the Third Reich was close to surrendering,
he rushed to Oslo while it was still under Nazi occupation to
catch a private plane which then took him to Spain, where he
received political asylum. During the few days he spent in Oslo,
he said that he was generally impressed with the Norwegians
as a well-rounded people. They appeared to be both intelligent
and physically robust, with a healthy, wholesome, and upbeat
approach to life. He didn't say anything about Nordic Aryan
Nazi supermen, just that he encountered a well-rounded, energetic,
intelligent, and wholesome people. The
Norwegian population group seems to have fewer people with behavior
and character disorders, and their group traits are skewed more
in the direction of innovators and early adopters, which suggests
an aptitude for long range planning and implementation. However,
just because a bell-shaped distribution of traits in a population
are skewed in a particular direction, doesn't mean that there
still are not dysfunctional people at the other end of the curve.
They are there for sure, just like all other population groups.
Please see my environmental
vs. genetics discussion for more on the "sociobiological"
implications of "bell curves." I
am reminded of an account of America's invasion of Cuba during
the Spanish American War where a military historian noted that
the Americans were disorganized and their operational plan was
a mess, but they won over the Spaniards anyway because the Spaniards
were even more disorganized and their operational capabilities
were an even bigger mess. That is probably a pretty accurate
way to compare Norwegians with most other white ethnic groups
in America. (However, as previously mentioned, unless they become
consciously aware of their own characteristics, as
well as those of alien peoples, and explicitly develop and conscientiously
implement a group "game plan," individualistic, free-spirited,
and "naive" Norwegians tend to experience major sociological
problems holding their own in competition with nasty, vicious,
and duplicitous Jews and their Catholic mafia allies for economic
and political power in multi-racial, multicultural, urban environments). As
one example of relative functioning, according to Michael Rivero
at whatreallyhappened.com,
Catholic statistics show that about 12% of priests are pedophiles,
and as Rivero puts it, they like to "diddle" with
little kids. A long time ago Norwegians and other Protestants
figured out that requiring celibacy among religious leaders
typically creates more problems than it solves over the long
run. Now given the fact that most Norwegian Lutheran ministers
are married and that pedophilia is almost unheard of among them,
I would ask if this makes Norwegians somehow "Aryan superman"
for simply taking a common sense approach on this issue? I don't
think so. I just think they are acting just a little bit more
"normal" and "sensible" than certain dogmatic
Catholic counterparts. In
Chapter
34Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis,
and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack
of my Mission of Conscience series, I describe how
Norwegian-Americans have also historically been "extra
normal" when it comes to staying out of jail.
Crime
statistics in America support the Scandinavian claim to lower
corruption and greater overall honesty. For example, in his
book Promise Fulfilled: A Portrait of Norwegian Americans
Today, Dr. Odd S. Lovoll writes on page 174:
A
concept of a relatively low rate of criminal activity and
imprisonment has of course some basis in historical fact,
as Pinderhughes documents. In calculations of "nationality
and criminals" for Wisconsin, where nativity for convicts
was carefully recorded, in 1892, O.N. Nelson announced with
ethnic exuberance that whereas the Irish had one convict
for 2,328 of their population in the state, and the German
one in 4,388, the Scandinavian-born had only one in 6,028,
and that furthermore convicts from Scandinavia served on
average much less time in prison than, for instance, the
German-born, indicating that their crimes had been less
severe.
Admittedly
"crime" can be a tricky concept when we look under
the hood at the specifics. Different racial and ethnic groups
tend to predominate within certain types of crime. For example,
blacks and Hispanics lead America in the rate of violent street
crime, whereas Jews lead in the rate of high level nonviolent
white collar crime, organized crime, and espionage. As an
example, although certain "official statistics"
show somewhere around 3% of the total population, Jews are
always in the majority among individuals arrested as high
level Wall Street swindlers or as spies for hostile foreign
intelligence services arrested by the FBI counterintelligence.
Norwegians
also appear to be "extra normal" when it comes to
personal hygiene and compassion for animals and other human
groups. Unlike the Jews described in Dr. William Pierces' articlesShocking
Differences (Free Speech, April 2001) and Feces,
Fetuses, Etc. (American Dissident Voices 5 May
2001), Norwegians are not morbidly preoccupied with excretory
functions. Unlike the Chinese described in these same articles,
Norwegians are not callously indifferent to the suffering of
animals, but invest considerable time and effort into supporting
organizations that try to prevent cruelty to animals -- and
fellow humans as well. Another
example of "extra normality," involves the "loose-tight"
decision-making characteristics described in the book In
Search of Excellence. This basically means the ability
of managers to function in both a centralized and decentralized
decision-making mode at the same time. I go into all of this
into more detail in my centralization
vs. decentralization article, but suffice to say for our
purposes here that it implies the ability of a manager to honestly
solicit grass roots input and admit that he and his superiors
have made mistakes in order to address problems in an objective
manner and take appropriate corrective action. Norwegians tend
to be relatively better at operating on this level compared
to most other white ethnic groups. Managers in many other ethnic
groups tend to experience chronic "alpha male" issues,
where grave concerns about "saving face," "keeping
up appearances," "maintaining bearing and command
presence" and other political and emotional elements take
priority over purely rational and objective decision-making
processes. Mangers in other ethnic groups are more likely to
engage in cover-ups instead of bringing problems out into the
open and honestly resolve them. We
are left with the question, does the ability to function on
a more rational and objective level in the decision-making process
imply "super man" stuff? Once again, I do not think
so. I think all of this simply suggests a more balanced temperament,
a more altruistic social conscience, and a better capability
to subordinate ones own pride and ego when necessary. Regarding
the way in which Nordic traits are antithetical to key characteristics
of German National Socialism -- or at least the viciously anti-German,
Jewish Hollywood interpretation of National Socialism fed to
the American public -- let us first observe that Adolf Hitler's
approach is usually considered highly authoritarian, centrist,
militaristic, and imperialistic. In contrast, ever since prehistoric
times Nordic peoples have been noteworthy for their parliamentary
institutions (called Things, as in the case of the
Icelandic Althing, one of the longest running forms
of republican government in the West), with an emphasis upon
individual rights and political decentralization In the 20th
century, the foreign policy of Scandinavian governments focused
upon neutrality rather than imperialism, and their military
establishments have always been kept subordinated to civilian
leaders. In
his classic work Racial
Realities in Europe, Lothrop Stoddard helps to clear
up the way in which many Americans confuse German "Nazi"
authoritarianism and "Nordic culture." In his Chapter
Alpinized
Germany, Stoddard describes how the racial balance in Germany
shifted dramatically after the 30 Years War of the 17th century
from Nordic to Alpine. The Alpine peoples tend to be highly
authoritarian and conventional wherever they are found on this
planet, whether in eastern Europe, Germany, Italy, France, or
the United States. While
"under Nordic management" Germany was very decentralized
in the Middle Ages, and became increasingly centralized in the
modern era as the Nordic percentage of the overall population
declined. This is similar to the pattern we have seen in U.S.
history, where increased centralization of the Federal government
has been directly correlated with the decline of Nordics as
a percentage of the overall U.S. population, a trend that began
in the mid-19th century. However, since Germany retained a "thin
veneer" of a Nordic culture (as Stoddard put it), and because
Adolf Hitler and other Nazis happened to admire Nordics, many
Americans continue to confuse "Nazism" with "Nordicism." In
Part
I of my Part
6: References and Appendices to my Iceland Gets
ENRONed series, I provide an extract from Chapter
One of Racial
Realities in Europe by Lothrop Stoddard which gives
an overview of Nordic characteristics. I am in general agreement
with Stoddard based upon my own personal experiences, although
I think the realities may be a little more complex than what
he has stated -- but Stoddard is a good start for neophytes.
An
important aspect of Stoddard's analysis is the way he describes
Nordic weaknesses and vulnerabilities as well as strengths.
As one example, in Appendix
VII, I have provided an excerpt from "Chapter XI The
Inner Dikes" from The Rising Tide of Color by
Dr. Lothrop Stoddard which provides an example about how Nordics
and other types whites tend to get themselves displaced over
time by alien peoples. Unless Nordics become consciously aware
of their own unique strengths and weaknesses, as well as those
of competing groups, and unless Nordics develop a conscious
strategy to survive as a distinct group, they tend to
melt away over time amidst competing racial and ethnic groups.
This is particularly true in dense urban environments like London,
New York, Chicago, or Los Angeles, where Nordic "individualism"
and the peculiar Nordic sense of idealism can become a disadvantage
in competition with other groups like Jews and Catholics. Under
such circumstances, Nordics tend to get squeezed out over time.
Worse yet, once they are diminished, the "adaptive mimicry"
displayed by other groups towards WASPs also starts to fall
by the wayside. In the place of the old mimicry the natural
traits of these groups begins to rise to the surface. Catholics
become ever more mindlessly authoritarian, dogmatic, reactionary,
and cruelly intolerant, and Jews become ever more psychopathic,
duplicitous, megalomaniacal, vicious, delusional, and otherwise
dangerous. As
previously mentioned on this web page, many sources describe
how the settlement of Nordic tribes in parts of Europe during
different historical periods tended to correlate with increased
political decentralization and parliamentary or republican forms
of government. This case is explicitly made in Early Civilizations
of the Nordic Peoples by Roger Pearson and implicitly
made in The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans
by William Everdell. One
of the big ironies that comes with discussing Nordic historical
success in providing ruling elites or winning wars since ancient
times (to include the Viking era) is that it may provide an
overly simplified impression of Nordic robustness and superiority
that simply does not exist. My personal impression from interacting
with Norwegian and Norwegian American groups is that even in
a homogeneous Nordic society, the margins for a viable, productive,
and self-sustaining society are very thin.
After you subtract out the fact that women as a group tend to
vote about one standard deviation to the ideological left and
tend to be "later adopters" than men, and also subtract
out the percentage of the population which is so tied down with
making a living they simply cannot afford to invest themselves
in dealing with the toughest social issues, and then factor
in that certain percentage of the population which is inherently
criminal, stupid, or lazy (they exist in every population group
around the world to some greater or lessor degree), and after
we discount many other other types of "load factors,"
Norwegian society just barely retains
enough highly intelligent innovators and early adopters to sustain
an advanced industrial society. A homogeneous Nordic society
just barely has enough highly intelligent,
tough-minded people to act as adequate "counter predators"
to keep in check innately authoritarian "predators"
(like so many Catholics) or innately criminal people (like so
many Jews). The indigenous Nordic folk culture is very fragile,
and it does not take the addition of many alien peoples before
one overstresses, swamps, and ruins everything that once made
Norway such a charming, self-sufficient, and productive little
country. There
is an important analogy I need to make involving the Protestant
vs. Catholic conflict in Northern Ireland. In my essay "Handling
Real Nazis" at the end of Chapter
34Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real
Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack
of my Mission of Conscience
I cite an article that appeared in Psychology Today
magazine in 1960's which observed how the differences between
Protestants and Irish Catholics go much deeper than
theology. They involve profound psychological differences
regarding attitudes towards authoritarianism, individualism,
collectivism, work, and other important areas. (Please see Chapter
34 for more background discussion, to include mention
about how the Scots-Irish Protestants have significantly greater
Nordic-High Celtic ancestry). Just like the way many Germans
privately joke about how "Africa begins south of the Alps,"
many Protestants view the Irish Catholics as a pathetic people
with too much "load" in their gene pool. (In my Patrick
Buchanan section of my Reconciling
Libertarianism and. Nationalism web page I describe
how 19th century British cartoonists often viewed Irish Catholics
as "Simians" who were fundamentally unfit to rule
themselves). In their view, the Irish Catholic population has
a disproportionate percentage of drunks, petty-greedy rent-seekers,
glad-handers, Hail Mary, Hail Pope, Hail Pedophile Priests!"
and "Lucky Charms" genuflecters,
Liberal-Minority-Coalition mafia aficionado wise guys, homely-dowdy-envious
proletarians, and white trash knuckle-heads -- you get the picture.
(Some Scots-Irish even call Irish Catholics "bog wogs"
and the "niggers of western Europe"). Many North Ireland
Protestants ("Scots-Irish") do not want to be blended
in with the Irish Catholics or subordinated to them any more
than someone who can just barely swim in the ocean wants to
try to rescue someone who is thrashing around and cannot swim
and is going under. Northern Ireland Protestants can just barely
manage their own problems as it is. Of
course many Irish Catholics are perfectly aware of the contempt
that many Scots, Scots-Irish, English, and other people in the
UK feel for them, and this, combined with centuries of bitter
experience under British rule, has caused many Irish Catholics
to stubbornly ally themselves with Jews and Italian Catholics
and nonwhites against WASPs in America come hell or high
water. A
good example of blind Irish-American hatred towards "Anglos,"
as well as highly organized and hard-fisted Irish-American militancy
that went well beyond "Tammany Hall" big city patronage
politics, was the Irish
invasion of Canada in 1866 that involved an estimated
25,000 "Irish Republican Army" soldiers. As another
example of organized Irish Catholic militancy, Irish Catholics
were a very potent force in organized labor movements of the
late 19th century and 20th century, often extracting "bennies"
(benefits) and "featherbedding" regulations in advance
of productivity gains to the point that they would often kill
the golden geese (that is, productive corporations) that lay
golden eggs and cause them to relocate to other parts of the
country or outside the U.S. An important sociological reason
why labor union "organizing" was generally much more
successful in Northern states compared to Southern "right
to work" states (where the Irish presence in politics and
police was significantly less) is that Irish political machines
and "Irish cops" would typically "look the other
way" as Irish-led unions applied violance against strikebreakers,
whereas in the South it was vastly harder for union members
to get violent without getting arrested. (Dr. Murray Rothbard
makes this point in his Mises
Institute lectures that involve the history of
organized labor, although as an anarcho-libertarian he leaves
out the Irish ethnic dimension, just as he generally leaves
out ethnic factors on most other social, political, and economic
issues). Many
Italian Catholics have a similar underdog mentality compared
to Irish Catholics, but for somewhat different sociological
reasons. On my Reconciling
Libertarianism and. Nationalism web page I comment
on an embedded film clip from True
Romance -- the Sicilians that features a confrontation
between a Sicilian mafia don played by Chris Walken and a retired
cop played by Dennis Hopper that is priceless. While living
in New York City, I once heard an Italian Catholic lady rave
on talk radio about how well Italian Catholics have historically
gotten along with Jews, part of the reason being is that they
have similar "family values." These "values"
no doubt also apply to exotic "families" like La
Cosa Nostra. A
classic example of Irish Catholic attachment to Jews involves
Joseph Kennedy, father of President John F. Kennedy, who apparently
felt very hurt by the way he was rejected by Boston WASP society.
According to Final
Judgment, after World War II, JFK's father
made a conscious decision to ally himself with Jews so that
one of his sons could have a shot at becoming the first Roman
Catholic president of the United States. Of course Joe Kennedy
knew "the score" better than most Americans about
how Jews
had set up the U.S. Federal Reserve Banking System, dragged
America unnecessarily into WWI, had been major
supporters of Bolshevism, had incited war and massive
hatred against Germany, and had pushed other very dangerous
and destructive policies. In addition, the Kennedys were skating
on very thin ice in other ways. When JFK was assassinated, there
was no "Irish mafia" capable of adequately retaliating
against the Jewish mafia. Despite all this, Joe Kennedy &
Sons decided to have a full throttle love affair with the Jews,
to include supporting their multiracial agenda. In
1958 JFK published A
Nation of Immigrants in league with the Jewish
ADL which called for loosening up immigration restrictions towards
Third World peoples, which certainly did not help the plight
of Nordic Americans and other WASPs who were already in decline.
Then in the mid-1960's JFK's brother Senator Teddy Kennedy and
other fellow Democrats joined with the ADL and other Jewish
groups to pass "immigration reform" legislation that
opened up the floodgates of Third World immigration, causing
the white population to decline from 90% in the early 1960's
to the situation that exists today where "Most
people over 60 are non-Hispanic whites, and most under 40 are
not." Most Third World immigrants tend to be Catholics
rather than Protestants, and they are more likely to support
the Democratic Party than Republicans, so the Kennedys were
able to gain both a political as well as demographic advantage
for their party and for Catholic hegemonic interests at the
expense of declining WASPs and the ability of America to remain
a First World country. In
any event, it is not the case that only Norwegians
are worried about compromising and diluting their fragile demographics
and indigenous folk culture by getting infiltrated by alien
peoples with dubious loyalties and discordant temperamental
traits. This is actually a fairly common concern with many other
groups throughout Europe, as Tom Chittum observes in Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America. (This includes
the way many northern Italian Catholics feel about southern
Italian Catholics, and northern French about southern French).
In fact, by traditional European right wing tribal standards,
America today is a land of mongrelized, rootless, Jewish-brainwashed,
neo-Jacobin leftist crazies. No wonder the Nordic percentage
of the U.S. population has been in steady decline over the last
150 years. No wonder criminal groups like Mossad-CIA-MI6 can
rise to the top without any cohesive European American groups
being able to keep them in check, and even worse, Mossad-CIA-MI6
gangsters can continuously pull off evil stunts around the world
like London 7/7, Fukushima 3-11, and Oslo-Utoya 7-22. For
anyone interested in examining the topics I have addressed so
far in greater detail, I offer more insights about Nordic peoples,
the evolution of their distinctive traits, and how these traits
affect their social and political institutions in my Reconciling
Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies series, to include
my web pages on centralization
vs. decentralization, environment
vs. genetics, and mutualism
vs. parasitism. The
second approach I advise for handling the Nordic vs. Nazi issue,
which makes a good sequel to the first approach, involves confronting
German National Socialist ideology and WWII revisionist history
head-on. This includes addressing the propaganda war waged by
the Allies against the Axis, and thoroughly examining the real
underlying social and political realities behind all
combatants With
this approach, we are less focused on characterizing indigenous
Nordic culture, and more focused on how many Americans may have
become brainwashed by extremely biased, selective, and even
disinformational propaganda that benefited only certain special
interests. As we ask cui bono? (or "who benefits),
we may end up spending more time looking at the Jewish owners
of the Bank of England and the privately owned Federal Reserve
Banking System in the United States, not to mention Jewish owners
of Hollywood and other major players behind global Zionism,
than anything to do with Germany, Russia, France, or the Nordic
peoples in Scandinavia. (Please read Chapter
33 and view the embedded video The Money Masters
before you decide that I am being totally off the wall here). In
the process of conducting an honest inquiry into the real nature
of Zionism, German National Socialism, Italian Fascism, Soviet
Communism, Winston Churchill's government, and the FDR Administration,
we may begin to make some valuable discoveries. The following
are some examples: *
Zionist Israel is much more "national socialist" in
a negative way than Germany ever was, yet the U.S. gives it
blank check support. (See Life
of An American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel
by Jack Bernstein, an American-Jewish writer.) Jews are also
vastly more destructive in terms of the total amount of human
suffering that they have caused on this planet compared to German
Nazis. If one factors in the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution (60
million deaths, estimated by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn), as well
as deaths and wasted lives caused by Jewish manipulation of
the economy (for example the artificial causes of the Great
Depression from financial manipulation by the privately controlled
Federal Reserve, see Secrets of the Federal Reserve
by Eustace Mullins and The Great Depression by Dr.
Murray Rothbard), not to mention the tens or hundreds of millions
of people likely to die as a consequence of the Mossad's Stuxnet
sabotage of the Fukushima reactors, Jewish-caused deaths around
the globe are well over a 100 times worse than anything ever
allegedly
done by the Germans. In fact, it is possible that the Fukushima
disaster may turn into a major extinctionevent,
making many Jews look more like Loki in the Old Norse Ragnarok
story or Satan in the Bible than real people. *
World War II, in many ways, still has not ended. The world is
still wrapped up in a continuing propaganda war that demonizes
all forms of nationalism (particularly white nationalism) outside
of Jewish nationalism (Zionism). The only "approved"
form of nationalism, called Zionism, is deemed noble and wonderful
by controlled national media. Zionists still benefit from reparations
stemming from exaggerated "holocaust" claims. They
justify extreme aggression against other peoples, such as the
genocide of much of the Japanese population following the 3-11
Stuxnet virus attack, based upon exaggerated feelings of victimhood
and paranoia. This propaganda war also involves suppression
of individuals who wish to simply examine facts in an objective
manner. See, for example, my discussion of the persecution of
professional historians who wish to critically examine Zionist
accounts of "the Holocaust" in Chapter
34Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real
Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack
of my Mission of Conscience.
I also cover suppression of individuals who wish to scientifically
understand the role of genetics on group as well as individual
behavior in my environmental
vs. genetic article. *
All the "goodies" are not on one side, and all the
"baddies" are not on the opposing side during World
War II. There were excesses committed on all sides. Also, going
back to World War I (many argue that WWII was simply a continuation
of WWI) Germany did not have "sole guilt"
for starting this mindlessly destructive war. There was plenty
of blame to go around for all the belligerents. Maintaining
a simplistic, black and white, comic book view of history does
much more harm than good, particularly because it continues
to damage the self-esteem and capacity for productive self-determination
held by many different peoples. This includes German and Italian
Americans in America, and nationalists within European countries
who seek to resist their own dispossession. There
is no substitute for reading viewpoints on all sides of a historical
issue. One good source is The
Barnes Review, for whom Michael Collins Piper
has been a frequent writer. It is also worth revisiting my editor's
note at the end of Capt. Eric May's 30 Sept 2011 article Amerika
Uber Alles: Our Nazi Nation, where I commented:
While
I think that Captain May's analysis has tremendous merit,
to include his comparison of the totalitarian nature of both
Zionism and Nazism, we should also note that there are some
important differences between Adolf Hitler and George Bush.
For example, according to Michael Collins Piper, Hitler was
heavily
decorated for combat service, whereas Bush avoided Vietnam.
Hitler rose to power after Germany had already experienced
Treaty
of Versailles humiliation and loss of territory, a hyperinflationary
depression, and a scary communist takeover attempt by the
Spartacists.
Many Germans were legitimately fearful that without strong
rightist leadership their country would relapse into depression
and suffer a ruthless communist takeover. In contrast, George
Bush inherited what was once a strong country defended by
two major oceans. America already had access to the cheapest
oil on the planet. (In 1998, the price of oil dropped to a
50-year inflation-adjusted price low of around $10.75 a barrel.
This was at a time when America encouraged a vastly more even-handed
policy between Israel and the Arab world). Bush has now created
vastly worse social conditions leading towards the
real possibility of World War III ruin, a hyperinflationary
depression, and a possible complete fascist takeover. Hitler
was democratically elected as Chancellor, whereas there is
strong evidence that George Bush stole his two Presidential
elections. Hitler inherited an authoritarian state pioneered
by Bismarck and Kaiser Wilhelm, whereas Bush is wrecking the
last vestiges of the U.S. Constitution, principled republicanism,
and American democracy. Adolf Hitler, who
was himself an artist, encouraged heroic neo-classical
artistic revivalism through sculptors such as Arno
Breker and architects like Albert
Speer. In contrast, I associate George Bush with such
"Animal
House in the West Wing" vulgarities as flipping
off the press and once screaming "Stop throwing the
Constitution in my face, it’s just a goddamned piece
of paper!” His wife once made a crude
joke at a formal supper about husband George milking a
male horse. Lastly, Hitler supported German national
interests and white ethnic-genetic interests against
Jewish multi-racialism and multi-cultural leftism directed
at gentiles, whereas George Bush supports Zionist globalism,
open borders with Mexico, free trade with Red China, multi-racialism,
and Israeli aggression in the Middle East against
American national interests and against the ethnic-genetic
interests of America's dwindling white middle class. As additional
commentary on this issue, in my site
map I quote from page 18 the 23 Oct 2006 American
Free Press:
...University of Wisconsin professor Kevin
Barrett has come out with a new book, which argues that
the U.S. government was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks.
Responding to a recent article about his book, Barrett commented
on a report that he has compared President Bush to Adolf
Hitler: “Hitler had a good 20 to 30 IQ points on Bush,
so comparing Bush to Hitler would in many ways be an insult
to Hitler.”
An
important irony we cannot overlook is the fact that the Nazis
acquired many of their tactics and techniques from the Communists.
Josef Goebbels was an ardent socialist before he converted
to Nazism. S.A. leader Ernst Roehm was such an ardent socialist
that he and many close followers got purged by Hitler during
the famous "Night of the Long Knives." Eric Hoffer,
in The True Believer, observes that some of the Nazi's
best converts were former Communists. In the biography Adolf
Hitler by John Toland, we even see a photo of a renter's
strike in which Nazi and Communist flags hung outside apartment
windows are mixed together. And
who were at the forefront of justifying, organizing, financing,
and promoting global Communism? According to Winston Churchill
in his famous 1920 article "Zionism
vs. Bolshevism: The Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People"
it was the Jews. Hence, we see a completed circled from Jewish
Bolshevism to German National Socialism back to Jewish neo-con
"Zionazism" in America today.
Last,
but not least, if one is interested in the viewpoint from
folks who totally jumped ship from America's controlled national
media ideological matrix, two good starting points are: "The
Measure of Greatness" and "By
Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War" by Dr. William
L. Pierce, former Chairman of the National Alliance. "The
Enigma of Hitler" by Leon Dagrelle. For more extensive
reading, consider Dagrelle's major work "Hitler:
Born At Versailles." Leon Dagrelle became a leading
general under Hitler in the Waffen S.S. and subsequently escaped
to Spain to live out his life as a writer.
Albert
Speer (left), Adolf Hitler, and Arno Breker (right)
making note of French cultural achievements while in
Paris in June 1940 following the German victory in the
Battle of France. Although Speer and Breker were civilians,
they were issued uniforms for this special occasion.
*
Most Americans must overcome emotional hysteria generated by
WWII propaganda before they can engage in rational analysis. It
is worth emphasizing that while many things done by German Nazis
and Italian Fascists may not have been very pretty, the extremely
serious threats faced by both the German and Italian people
were not very pretty either, and their motivation to find manly
and decisive ways to organize themselves to handle these threats
is certainly understandable, even if we might disagree with
certain tactics. For example, Germany came within a hair of
being taken over by hardcore Communists directly supported by
Lenin and his Jewish Bolshevik gang in 1919 who had already
signaled that they were prepared to conduct major GULAG Archipelago-scale
liquidations. In the early 1920's most Germans were wiped out
by hyperinflation. German-speaking peoples who had been ruled
by fellow Germans for centuries were put under the heel of abusive
aliens by the Versailles Treaty. Stalin built the largest war
machine in Europe and planned to roll across Europe and exterminate
tens of millions of its best people. (See Joachim Hoffman's
review
of Stalin’s War of Extermination: 1941 -1945,
also Did
Hitler Save Europe From Communism? by Jim Marrs,
Rense.com, 28 Nov 2011). There
is actually quite a long list of very realthreats that worried the average German in the 1920's and
1930's, but there is no need to go into further details here,
except to point out that Karl Marx's saying "History repeats
itself, first as tragedy, second as farce" seems to now
apply when we compare Nazi Germany with Zio-Nazi America. The
key point behind this discussion is that with far less social
stress than what the Germans ever faced in the 1920's and 1930's,
Americans have allowed themselves to get hijacked into a tragi-farce
police state and also into very destructive and disastrous foreign
military adventures that have yanked most of the moral high
ground out from under Americans in terms of ever pointing the
finger at German National Socialists again. In addition, there
must be something overly simplistic about their view of the
world if Americans can allow themselves to get maneuvered into
such a mess. I think a good starting point is to look at how
WWII propaganda made German National Socialists looks like bad
guys who always wear black hats, and simultaneously made the
Jews out to be the good guys who always wear the white hats.
I think that everything that I have laid out on this web page
about Zionist skullduggery and Jewish characteristics should
help the reader understand how erroneous, overly simplistic,
and potentially dangerous this comic book view of the world
can be.
b) Small
countries like Norway and Iceland are "obsolete" and
"anachronistic" in a "globalized"world.
Unfortunately
vast numbers of Americans have been dog-trained by their controlled
national media to think that we require some kind of all-wise,
all munificent, centralized federal establishment to be the
ultimate arbiter and regulator of all problems and issues at
the state, county, and even small town level. In addition, they
have been conditioned to think we need a similar "United
Nations" establishment to manage all affairs between all
nations at the international level. Many
Americans have also been conditioned to feel that through some
kind of super magical process, we will see incredibly intelligent,
wise, and self-restrained people get installed at these higher
levels. They will put in longer hours than Santa Claus and his
elves making toys before Christmas in order to wisely plan our
destiny and keep us safe from terrorists hiding behind every
bush. They will also help protect us from free-thinking nationalists
lurking behind potted palms and other scary goblins. I
could go on, but I think the reader gets the idea. When it comes
to the Federal Government and United Nations, Americans have
been heavily conditioned to hold highly authoritarian and even
collectivistic attitudes. Quite often, this conditioning has
been very subtle. For example, I think of a painting that I
have seen in a number of Sunday school classrooms that show
a large ghost of Jesus standing next to the United Nations Building,
billed as "the last best hope for humanity." When
we mentally switch gears and consider that in many important
respects governments function much like businesses, and all
the problems and issues we find in business competition also
have valid analogies in international relations, suddenly the
world looks very different. I
have already explained earlier on this web page how Norway is
analogous to a small, entrepreneurial company in terms of the
way it relates economically to other countries around the world.
I also described the observation by Dr. Ralph Raico, namely
that the dissolution of the western Roman Empire was good for
human liberty, because the existence of many competing states
made it easier for productive people to exit to a competing
country if they were mistreated in their home country. This
in turn created an incentive for rulers to reduce taxes and
alleviate oppression and unnecessary exploitation of productive
people. One
important pattern commonly found in business is that it is small
companies rather than giant corporations and conglomerates that
tend to produce most of the innovation and new jobs. As companies
get larger, they tend to become more bureaucratic and more likely
to promote managers who are more interested in playing political
games to advance their careers rather than focus on productivity
and quality improvements. They tend to "buy" innovation
when they need it by acquiring small companies or their intellectual
properties instead of originating patents in-house. They also
tend to become more corrupt, whereby top executives cut corners
to pay themselves bigger salaries and bonuses than they are
worth, and use their corporate influence over politicians to
pass legislation to shut out their competition. The famous saying
by Lord Acton, namely "power corrupts, and absolute power
corrupts absolutely" applies in the business world as well
as in government. In extreme cases large corporations become
fertile ground for "psychopathic nesting" in which
the most unscrupulous people rise to the top. Once
large corporations become so corrupt and dysfunctional that
they trend towards bankruptcy, a common practice on Wall Street
to restore efficiency and transparency is to spin off various
product lines as separate companies. Because
of the special characteristics frequently offered by small companies,
many large companies in an industry group find it beneficial
to be surrounded by many small companies in a kind of symbiotic,
ecological relationship. The
analogy with politics should be immediately obvious here: Why
can't medium and large countries find it beneficial to be surrounded
by small countries? Why the mania for "one world government"
that abolishes all separate nations? It is like abolishing all
separate retail businesses in America and forcing everyone to
buy from one big state-run department store like in the old
Soviet Union. It is no different when you eliminate competition
and create monopolies in politics any more than in business. The
late Dr. Murray Rothbard observed in his Mises Institute lectures
that a key factor for driving up wages over the long run is
not the ability of unions to force
up pay scales by threatening to strike. Nor is it government
"stimulus" per se. The real driver involves the ability
of thriving companies that are making productivity gains and
product quality improvements to pay higher salaries to attract
the quality people they need. There
are two other very important factors worth mentioning here,
namely the enhancement of manufacturing capabilities, and the
development of cohesive and productive corporate cultures. I
will explain their relevance to Norway and the small country
issue later, but first let me go over what I mean by each of
these two factors. Eumon
Fingleton observes in his book In Praise of Hard Industries
that in the long run, manufacturing industries have a vastly
better capacity to continuously generate new real wealth and
raise wages than any other industry, because continuous improvements
in machinery that can run 24 hours a day can generate limitless
productivity gains, and wages are usually a small component
of total plant and equipment costs (and therefore easier to
raise), whereas various types of service industries are heavily
constrained by the physical limitations of humans. A corollary
of this observation is that it is important to retain possession
of manufacturing facilities in order to continuously tinker
and improve upon them rather than lose possession of them to
foreigners overseas. It is also better over the long run to
nurture a skilled and stable work force at home compared to
gaining a short term profit advantage by outsourcing to the
lowest cost labor abroad. Let
us now address the culture issue. In Search of Excellence
and other books about management methods acknowledge the need
to develop a positive, cohesive, winning corporate culture to
achieve success. In the McKinsey "7 S" model that
covers major ingredients for successful functioning, this is
called "Superordinate goals." (I provide a "7
S" diagram and additional discussion in Chapter
6). Back
in the 19th century America had a winning culture with its large
WASP middle class that practiced the Protestant work ethic.
The Liberal Minority Coalition described by Wilmot Robertson
in The Dispossessed Majority has helped to wreck all
this, and not surprisingly we are seeing the consequences as
the American economy continues its tragic decline. Now
back to Norway and the small country question. As a small, relatively
homogenous Nordic country, Norway retains a social culture relatively
free of social strife where people can focus most of their time
and attention on the creation of useful products. Since Norway
generally refrains from imperialist adventures, it can devote
more of its time and energy towards trying to develop products
from the ground up that offer an attractive price to quality
ratio that people want to buy on the free market. In
contrast, much bigger countries like the UK and U.S. spend disproportionate
amounts of time engaging in overseas military adventures and
intelligence operations intrigues to bully people into giving
them something for nothing, rather than developing useful products
that people want to buy. For example, both the UK and U.S. run
Dope
Inc. (see the book by Lyndon LaRouche and
his staff) in which they use Mossad-CIA-MI6 to cover for opium
production and distribution out out of Afghanistan and other
places. As an economic activity, addictive drug use is parasitic.
While drug-peddling generates enormous amounts of cash for certain
special interests, the consumption of addictive drugs generally
does more to tear down productive human resources in society
and increase social costs through enhanced corruption than help
productivity growth. America
needs to protect its white middle class, not dilute and dispossess
it with illegal aliens. It needs to nurture its strategic industries
and continually improve upon them rather than sell them out
to foreigners. It needs to respect the need for political and
economic decentralization to foster entrepreneurship and innovation.
It also needs to respect these things on an international level
as well, to include having a supportive attitude towards the
Scandinavian countries, which have always been world leaders
in entrepreneurship as well as the defense of individual liberty.
Clearly
a world with many competing nations creates many additional
firewalls to help prevent a dark totalitarian world from taking
over, where all media is monopolized everywhere, all political
parties are completely infiltrated and covertly controlled by
intelligence agencies who practice "controlled opposition"
and "full spectrum dominance" tactics, and everyone
is micro-chipped and enslaved to psychopathic elite that gets
sadistic enjoyment out of periodically abusing, assassinating,
and culling out major portions of the population. The "firewalls"
of national borders create bastions where people can dare to
tell the truth, rather than always feel forced to only say what
a master wants to hear. Dr.
Murray Rothbard once told an amusing anecdote that illustrated
this point perfectly. He observed that in Communist China under
Mao Tse Tung, there were no free markets which could help show
how supply and demand forces set prices. In a centralized, communist
command economy, prices could only be arbitrarily set by bureaucrats
in the absence of a free market to convey price information.
This led to huge price distortions, analogous to stories about
$600 hammers in America procured by the military-industrial
complex under cost-plus pricing programs for favored companies. Then
someone in Red China hit on a novel idea: why not import catalogs
from Hong Kong to get a better idea regarding what things should
cost? According to Rothbard, the Red Chinese actually adopted
this practice. Then a joke went around that after the entire
world was taken over by the Communists, they would have to leave
Hong Kong alone as a free market society so that rest of the
world could import their catalogs to figure out what things
are supposed to cost. Similarly,
after the Rothschilds-City of London, Mossad-CIA-MI6, and other
nefarious entities succeed in killing off much of the earth's
population with radiation poisoning and other "soft kill"
weapons, and then finish micro-chipping the rest of humanity
to turn them into totally obedient robo-slaves, followed by
the total control of all economic activity by a vast bureaucracy,
the New World Order rulers in Jerusalem might still have to
leave Norway and Iceland alone so that there will still be someone
around who can provide an honest record of human history --
and provide catalogs with free-market pricing to boot. One
can argue that a major reason why America is such a mess today
is because too many de facto monopolies have grown like cancers
in this country. They have squeezed out honest and productive
people. They have have placed most of the economic and political
power in the hands of psychopaths and other criminals who are
actively working against the best interests of the American
people in particular, and humanity in general. These monopolies
include the Jewish -controlled Federal Reserve Banking System
in America and the Bank of England in the UK. Zionists
have parlayed these money machines into control over major Wall
Street markets, and have also diversified their wealth into
significant control over other strategic industries, to include
media, pharmaceuticals, and precious metals. The monopolies
also include American government as a whole, which has grown
from about 5% of GDP (from the 1780's to 1861), to now comprising
somewhere between 50-70% of the overall economy. Certain sub-sectors
of the government have also grown extremely powerful, such as
the CIA, which has bragged about being able to control any journalists
of note, and which has infiltrated state governments across
America (as reported by Gov. Jesse Ventura). The FBI, which
routinely infiltrates and misdirects political movements on
all ends of the political spectrum through its COINTELPRO operations. The
upshot of all this is that America is run largely top-down by
an unholy partnership of megalomaniacal, quasi-psychotic Zionists
and pompous bureaucratic careerists who think they know what
is best for America, but barely have a comic book level of understanding
of important economic and social issues. (Many of them sit on
the new "Principals Committee" and think it is hilarious
that Muammar Gaddafi's staff got blown away under a white flag).
They certainly have no capability to "think outside the
box" when necessary. The American system has indeed become
simply a secular version of the corrupt, imperialistic, and
dysfunctional Catholic Church of the late Middle Ages combined
with all the ugliness of a scatological Jewish ghetto-gutter
mentality. This
helps to paint the hostility of America's power elite towards
productive, successful, and less corrupt small countries like
Norway in a new light. It is like the contempt that a pedophile
feels for a healthy young child who feels too clean and unblemished
for his dark and degenerate senses. If
North America itself had more independent states, this would
increase the margin of safety in favor of the preservation of
free speech and productivity. It would reduce the power base
of the aforementioned anti-small state macro-social pedophiles.
It would also diminish the influence of global depopulation
lunatics and mass microchip enslavement aficionados. The
problem is not that we have small countries like Norway and
Iceland in this world, but rather that we don't have enough
of them. We absolutely need more forms
of decentralized economic and political power around our planet
to help restore sanity and accountability.
c) "Homogeneity"
in a white (particularly a Nordic) country is somehow reprehensibly
"racist," economically "irrational," and
disruptive to a harmonious, global order
Unfortunately
many Americans have been pre-programmed by Jewish media to immediately
interpret this question from some very nasty and misleading
viewpoints. I have already described in the first section how
many Americans have been dog-trained by controlled media to
falsely link anything that is "pro-white" or "Nordic"
with something that is reprehensibly "pro-Nazi." One
very tragic reason for this is that most white Americans are
the product of a melting pot society that has completely severed
its links to indigenous Europe cultures. On a deep cultural
and ethnic level many of them have become like mongrels -- rootless
white trash -- so gullible and brainwashed that they are willing
to fight and die for a highly criminal people like the Jews
before they would stand up for the survival of their very own
people! Worse
yet, many white Americans such as German-Americans, Italian
Americans, Russian Americans, and English Americans may be filled
with unfairly negative feelings towards the land of their ancestors
as a consequence of anti-Russian propaganda during the Cold
War, anti-German and anti-Italian propaganda during World War
II, and anti-British propaganda during the War of 1812 and American
War for Independence. These
misguided Americans are like kids raised in an orphanage without
any knowledge of their real parents who do not understand what
it is like to be raised in a stable family with loving parents
and real relatives and real ancestors. In this sense, most white
Americans are "ethnic orphans." Like real orphans
at places like Boys Town, Nebraska who can easily become prey
to pedophile rings, some of which have been run by government
agencies like the CIA (see The
Franklin Cover-up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska
by John W. deCamp), Americans are often victims of what I call
"serial macro-social pedophiles" like the Zionist
neocons portrayed inThe
High Priests of War by Mike Piper. These
serial macro social pedophiles take idealistic but rootless
and naive Americans and use them up in misbegotten wars for
Israel around the world that actually work against legitimate
American national interests. We also see macro-social pedophilia
at work inside the U.S. by Jewish organizations like the ADL,
who are always trying to find ever more ingenuous ways to sodomize
free speech in America (see my Rev.
Ted Pike archive). Often
the ADL will identify an area of the United States such as northern
Idaho which it feels is "too white" and start to run
a campaign to aggressively introduce nonwhites into the area,
whether it is good for the local community or not. They wish
to obliterate any sense of white heritage or cohesion, just
like a sexual pedophile seeks to traumatize an unblemished little
child. ADL campaigns typically include creating agents provocateurs
such as phony pro-white activists who act in a very unattractive
manner to discredit their position in public debate. In
my parasitism
article that covers Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology,
I discuss the research by the French author Herve Ryssen, French
author of The Mirror of Judaism, The Jewish Fanatic,
the Jewish Mafia, The Psychoanalysis of Judaism,
and the online article "The
Psychopathology of Judaism." According to Ryssen, Jewish
communities have a high rate of sexual pedophilia and incest
as well as homosexuality. When we combine all of this with their
Neanderthal-level
of ethnic-genetic distance, we
should not be terribly surprised when Jews act out their dark
and twisted impulses on a macro-social level against white communities
in Idaho and elsewhere across America. A
major reason why a "serial macro social pedophile"
like the ADL is often able to get away with these outrageously
criminal tactics is because most white Americans are "ethnic
orphans" and do not have a strong enough ethnic identity
to want to stand up for anything, but instead remain passive
"sheeple" and even gullibly believe that actively
destroying Western Civilization with "diversity" is
a good thing. I am reminded of the famous
quip by the Soviet Premier Nikita
Khrushchev: "The Americans? Why, you spit in their
faces and they think it's dew." A
very effective approach to address the multi-racial, multicultural
issue, even for brain-dead American ethnic orphans, is to simply
appeal for consistent standards across all racial and ethnic
groups. Generally, virtually all racial, ethnic, and tribal
groups throughout history have felt that they have a right to
survive as a distinct entity. Most people want to be able to
determine their own destiny, and preserve their own culture.
Therefore, if Europeans are willing to acknowledge the right
of Third World peoples to have their countries, why can't Europeans
ask for the same thing for themselves in return? Interestingly
enough, Dr. David Duke claims that he successfully used this
approach when he was invited to speak in an Arab country on
the Saudi Arabian peninsula. When asked why he opposed Muslim
integration into Europe, Duke asked a rhetorical question. If
Muslims resent having Europeans colonize their countries in
the Middle East, alter their cultures, and meddle in their internal
affairs in other ways, why shouldn't Europeans feel the same
way about Muslim immigration into their own countries? Dr. Duke
claims that his Muslim audience seemed to nod in agreement with
him. There
is another important approach that helps clarify this issue
without appearing to be "anti-" any particular racial
or ethnic group, or demand reciprocity. It is more inwardly
focused. I call it the "paleo-diet" approach, which
is based on the concept that an important component of a truly
healthy diet is anchored on the kind of diet that ones ancestors
became adapted to over a period of thousands of years. This
may vary with different peoples. For example, in ancient times
if one was a Polynesian and one could not stomach poi (made
from taro), one could be in very serious trouble, because on
many long voyages poi was all Polynesians had outside of catching
fish, and on many islands taro was the main staple. It is easy
to see how people who could not stomach poi and fish would either
tend to select themselves out by not going on long voyages in
the first place, or else suffer various forms of adverse Darwinian
selection in areas where eating taro was a necessity. Not surprisingly,
native Hawaiians tend to have a greater appetite for poi than
most other people. In
my own case, I can drink milk like it is water and eat fish
at any time of day. I view that as an indicator of Norwegian
ancestry, because in many parts of Norway fish and cows are
the primary food sources. I have encountered a number of fellow
whites who are allergic to milk, immediately get seasick and
want to throw up the moment they are in small boat that starts
to rock, and intensely dislike the smell of fish odors that
I find pleasing. They cannot fathom why I never get seasick
when tossed about on a violent ocean and am happy to eat fish
for for breakfast and lunch and dinner. Maybe I am some kind
of northern European X-man mutant, or else maybe they
are the ones who are strange, or whatever. The point is that
the "paleo-diet" that works for me is different than
the one that works for them, and I also think there are distinct
differences in social-interactive-cognitive tastes as well as
taste buds, that cause a person like myself to function better
in a different kind of society than the kind of society that
is preferred by these other whites. Human
behavior is both genetic as well as environmental, and we learn
from sociobiology that genetically-based traits apply on a group
level as well as an individual level (as one example, I discuss
the evolution of group-level "altruism" in my environmental
vs. genetics article). Sometimes groups can acquire temperamental
traits that are not necessarily "logical," but instead
reflect quirks in the evolutionary selective process. It is
very common to see these kinds of evolutionary quirks in the
animal world. For example bats, which are ordinarily reasonably
strong fliers, have to drop off a cliff edge or a branch in
order to take off and cannot get airborne off a flat floor,
but instead flop around. Similarly, Panda bears require an environment
that closely mimics their natural environment, to include bamboo
shoots, or else their fertility rate in captivity plummets.
Also as another example, bees are normally pretty good about
hovering about like a helicopter, however, when placed inside
a thimble with an open top, they simply cannot get out. Similarly,
let us consider how Norwegians and other Nordic peoples have
evolved in a unique environment involving a dispersed homogenous
tribal society with a coherent folk culture and a focus on technological
adaptation in a continuing war with nature under extreme quasi-Arctic
conditions. This description of the original evolutionary environment
for Norwegians alone, utilizing the paleo-diet concept, should
provide a good clue about where "baseline functioning"
for Norwegian society lies. Conversely, we might expect that
when we depart from this evolutionary baseline, for example
insert Norwegians into a "New
Babylon" urban jungle like New York City where they
are surrounded by ferociously psychopathic Jews and dogmatic
Catholic mafia (like Rudy Giuliani and Richard Daley) and leftist
Democratic Party/pro-New World Order Negro "yes men"
(like Obama and Holder) and miscellaneous other "diversity
pets" of "serial macro-social pedophiles," we
start to "pull on a rubber band," or even worse, Norwegians
may even begin to experience various forms of social dysfunction
reminiscent of bats on floors, bees in thimbles, and Panda bears
in zoos in the face of such an alien environment. I
have had quite of experience interacting with Scandinavians
and other groups (to include Catholics and Jews) in dense urban
environments, and it is clear to me that Nordics must have a
clear understanding of their own innate characteristics as well
as those of alien peoples, and on top of this develop and consciously
adhere to a realistic action plan or else they and other types
of WASPs will inevitably tend to get squeezed out over time,
just as they have been squeezed out in the U.S. and UK. The
punchline behind this phenomenon is that it is ultimately not
"logical" or "ideological" in nature. Instead,
it is primarily evolutionary, sociobiological, and genetic in
origin. I am convinced that the only way that Scandinavian peoples
like the Swedes, Norwegians, and Icelanders can survive as a
people over the long run, and not be infiltrated and completely
taken over and corrupted by aliens, is to maintain a homogenous
Nordic society on their own territory and retain an indigenous
tribal culture. This is just the way it is -- "the facts
of life." Last,
but not least, I have developed another approach which supports
my paleoconservative leanings in defense of the existence of
small ethnostates and also in defiance of the multiracial, unipolar,
New World Order. This consists of a thought experiment, and
based upon my audience tests so far, it seems to work pretty
well to help people understand the logic of this position. It
goes as follows: Imagine
that in the early 20th century, some conqueror had rolled over
Europe and retained adequate military force everywhere to enforce
his wildest whims. Imagine if he believed that ethnic nationalism
was a thing of the past, and therefore commenced a forceful
deportation program in which over 90% of the indigenous inhabitants
of every European city would be spread out over all the other
countries, so that no European city would have a dominant ethnic
population anymore. Imagine if he also erased all European borders
and established pure free trade. Imagine that he also completely
controlled all media and brainwashed most people to believe
that multi-racialism and multiculturalism are the wave of the
future, and people should focus all their efforts on making
money without concern for the social ramifications. His government,
as the central authority over all of Europe, claims that only
it can preserve individual rights and promote perfect equality
between all European ethnic groups and individuals and combat
all forms of "racism" and "xenophobia."
What
we would have here, in essence, is a leftist, top down, "Neo-Jacobin"
government. (Please note how I categorize "environmental
top down Neo-Jacobin ideology" on the ideology map in the
Introduction
to my "Reconciling Ideologies" series). Let us imagine
as well that this leader was able to implement his policies
for about 30 years, or however long it takes to see their impact.
What might we expect the long term outcome to be? I would suggest
the following: a)
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Therefore
I would expect the central government and media monopoly to
become very corrupt over time, heavily geared towards meeting
the needs to the supreme leader and his inner circle, and increasingly
decoupled from the needs of common people. b)
Since the supreme value is now to make money, and the ethnic
pride of every European group has been crushed or suppressed,
I would expect that values across Europe would shift towards
immediate gratification and speculative gain rather than prudent
long term investment. c)
Once people become materialistic and rootless beyond a certain
point, they can no longer effectively unite to assert traditional
values and serve as counterpredators against criminal predators.
Since Jews are better adapted for this kind of environment than
any other group, I would expect them and similar groups rich
in psychopathic traits to start rising to the top. This will
then enter Europe into whole new levels of vicious corruption,
where power elites will start routinely engaging in assassinations,
massive financial system theft, false flag operations, and other
forms of extremely selfish, deceitful, and destructive competition.
In addition, since few people retain core ethnic loyalties,
business leaders will start importing Third World peoples as
low cost labor, causing racial and ethnic strife to skyrocket. d)
At some point the ratio of parasitic, rent-seeking, petty, mean,
vicious people to altruistic and productive people will rise
to a tipping point where it becomes obvious that Europe has
become terminally decadent and dysfunctional. The complete process
for this to happen might take much longer than 30 years, but
let us say for the sake of argument that trend towards terminal
decadence becomes obvious in about 30 years. A
society that is in terminal decadence is no longer able to effectively
organize itself and handle major threats. Such a society can
no longer resist accelerating Third Word immigration that threatens
to completely swamp all original white ethnic groups. No one
can stop ever-rising levels of corruption that make it increasingly
difficult to do business in a stable environment. Imagine
in our hypothetical scenario that we begin to see unmistakable
signs that Europe as a whole is slipping into terminal decadence.
Moral disorder and infectious greed is taking over everywhere.
The White birthrate has plummeted, whites are being replaced
by Third World peoples everywhere, and many areas of Europe
are now taking on Third World characteristics. Imagine
that there are still some remnants of the old Europe that live
in their own "ethnic neighborhoods" around Europe,
however, thanks to a "melting pot" ethic promoted
by the supreme leader that entourages intermarriage, these groups
have been disintegrating over time, although it may not be too
late to reconstitute most of them. Now,
at this point in our hypothetical scenario, imagine that the
supreme leader suddenly dies and you, dear reader, are just
as suddenly installed in his place. What are the most obvious
first steps that come to your mind to sort out and reverse the
slide towards terminal decadence and white obliteration? The
most obvious solution to me to sort out this mess is to try
to repatriate the scattered ethnic groups and restore the old
nation states of Europe, and simultaneously try to decentralize
political and media power down to the nation state level. Admittedly,
it will take time to rebuild racial, ethnic, and national identity
and pride, but every other course of action seems to be worse.
Once
nation states are rehabilitated, people will feel motivated
to think in broader social terms besides making quick money
for themselves. The will also be interested in investing in
intangibles such as maintaining a coherent indigenous folk culture
that supports the survival of their own people over the long
term. The
new competition between different countries will break the old
centralized European governmental monopoly, and reduce the level
of corruption that the unitary executive brought with him. More
competition between different corporations in different countries
will also reduce the abusiveness of top managers, since it is
now easier for them to lose talented employees to their competition. If
the reader agrees so far with the general thrust of this thought
experiment, I will now throw in a punchline that relates to
the history of the United States. Isn't it fair to say that
even though European immigrant groups voluntarily scattered
themselves across North America in the 19th century while under
the sway of "melting pot" ideology, the net effect
has been the same as if it had been done by coercion, as in
our thought experiment? Isn't
it fair to say that the "War to Save the Union" waged
in the name of protecting liberal ideals has had the same long
term net effect as if America had been conquered and consolidated
by a foreign invader? Isn't it also fair to say that ever since
1861, the federal government has gone in the exact opposite
philosophical direction compared to decentralization methods
that would work for our hypothetical scenario involving a conquered
and forcefully integrated Europe -- or to use a corporate analogy
-- would be needed to restore honesty, transparency, and productivity
in a bloated and corrupt large corporation? Dr.
Murray Rothbard made the point in his Mises Institute lectures
that in the name of "saving the Union" -- at all costs
-- more lives were expended between 1861-1865 than if America
had remained highly decentralized under the Articles of Confederation.
Then we might expect only relatively small brush fire wars to
break out on a decentralized level between fully sovereign states,
costing nowhere near as much in aggregate as the lives that
were lost and the destruction that was wrought during the War
of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence. In
addition, in the process of "saving the Union," and
hence creating a centralized multi-racial, multi-cultural, imperial
New Babylon society, we have gained a totally corrupt Jewish
plutocracy in America that is completely decoupled from the
values of America's original WASP founding stock. This alien
power elite thinks that it has a divine right to rule by whatever
means necessary. This includes creating and playing off false
divisions against each other in American society, neutering
legitimate grass roots political movements with COINTELPRO-type
infiltration programs, and running false flag attacks to keep
Americans distracted with phony enemies and phony wars. After
all, "war
is the health of the state" and it is also the health
of the alien-dominated, neo-Jacobin empire. If
we wish to rebuild nationalist decentralization in North America,
why should we ignore time-proven ethnic, racial, and religious
fault lines here any more than if we try to rebuild ethnostates
in Europe? Interesting
enough, not only are the Norwegians and other Scandinavians
among the most prosperous peoples in Europe, but we also see
a similar pattern here in America. North Dakota, which has the
largest percentage of Norwegian Americans of all states, combined
with a large percentage of German Americans, is one of the most
economically prosperous and stable states in America, with the
most rational and self-disciplined state banking system. It
has been hurt the least by the current economic downturn. It
is worth making an aside regarding German-Americans. America's
original German immigrants, misnamed "Pennsylvania
Dutch" (a corruption of "Pennsylvania Deutsch")
were Rhine West bank Lutherans. They came from the most Nordic
part of Germany, and among other things that demonstrated their
superior craftsmanship and engineering skills, contributed the
"Pennsylvania Rifle" (later renamed the "Kentucky
Rifle") that played a key role for Patriot side during
many important battles of the War of Independence. A prime example
was the Battle of King's Mountain. (The "Pennsylvania rifle"
had twice the effective range of the "Brown Bess"
standard army issue musket of the British army, but took twice
as long to reload. Hence, it was best used to pick off enemy
soldiers at stand off range without necessarily closing in on
them). I do not know about the Nordic component of German-Americans
in North Dakota, but I do know that historically Norwegian Americans
get along well with German Americans in places like Wisconsin,
Minnesota, Iowa, and North Dakota -- and without running any
of Glen Beck's Hitler Youth camps either! Isn't
it interesting that the state in America with the highest percentage
of Nordics and other WASPs, and the lowest percentage of southern
European Catholics and Jews, and with the fewest nonwhites,
would be the most prosperous? (How long this situation will
last is up for question, depending on how long it will take
before the U.S. breaks apart and reorganizes itself, vs. the
rate in which the ADL and various U.S. government agencies and
misguided Christian organizations subject North Dakota to their
serial macro-social pedophilia. Given that the dollar is headed
for zero, and radioactive contamination is building up in America's
breadbasket, things are probably going to come to a head sooner
than most people imagine). Isn't
it interesting that Zionist leaders, whose society in Israel
is rated as more corrupt than virtually any European country,
and who are forever in need of massive foreign aid, insist on
calling the shots in America? They install people like Panetta
and Napolitano into high positions whose ancestors come from
parts of Europe that are considered the next most corrupt and
dysfunctional after Israel. Meanwhile,
Norwegian Americans like myself, whose ancestors have the best
track record for honesty, productivity, and stability, are marginalized.
What does that tell you about the power structure in America
today, and America's totally upside down national priorities,
where bank robbers like Jewish Goldman Sachs run the banking
system, and people who do not care about incapacitating 55%
of American soldiers with depleted uranium -- or importing drugs
from Afghanistan and Columbia -- or waging wars for the exclusive
benefit of Israel and the heavily Mossad-connected military
industrial complex and the Jewish "blood
bankers" -- and who maintain open borders with Mexico
-- all these kinds of people openly run our "national defense"
instead! If
everything that I have said is correct, then all of this then
leads to another important question. What kind of people would
try to use false flag terror on a people like the Norwegians,
and on top of this cram multi-racialism and multiculturalism
down their throats, knowing full well that in the long run this
means anti-Nordic genocide, while at the same time demanding
homogeneity and exclusivity for their own people -- in Israel?
I
leave it to the reader to come up with his or her own answer,
which at this point should be obvious.
"Trio Solutreans" from John
de Nugent's web site. De Nugent is in the center, Jason
Salyers is to the left, and de Nugent's "honorary Aryan"
friend Clark Lightbridge is to the right.
Appendix
C
An
Aside Regarding False Flag Theory and Conjecture. Is it possible that the author of this
web page may have been intended
as an opportunistic patsy while trying to organize a
Fukushima-related conference in Oslo?
(My
personal response to Janet Napolitano's totalitarian and
dishonest "Hear Something, Say Something" Program,
and another perspective on MKULTRA mind control)
by William .B. Fox
In
presenting background on Thor Heyerdahl's theory about whites
who preceded Mongoloids in the habitation of the prehistoric
Americas, I find myself in a quandary where I like to give credit
where credit is due, and the truth is that I have learned a
lot from the research of John de Nugent this area. At the same
time I want to avoid getting "sheep-dipped" with a
"guilt by association" Nazi label. I am specifically
referring to Chapter
34Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real
Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack
of my Mission of Conscience
series where I describe my interaction with John de Nugent,
who has been promoting "National Socialism 2.0" as
well as "Solutreanism." (These two topics do not deserve
to be entangled with each other, as I explain in Chapter 34
). Complicating
matters further, some interesting coincidences in my own life
relate to Oslo-Utoya 7-22 tragedy, in which I was originally
scheduled to arrive at the Oslo airport the day before the bomb
went off. This sensitized me to the possibility that someone
might have wanted to set me up as a patsy and use my stay at
de Nugent's place to fabricate a "neo-Nazi conspiracy"
legend. As
another interesting coincidence, on 7 August 2011 Sergeant First
Class (SFC) Donald Buswell, a retired U.S. Army Intelligence
SNCO profiled in Chapter
20, sent me a surprise "Hey -do you think?!?!"
type email regarding myself and 7-22. I had not communicated
with SFC Buswell at all for over a month -- well before 7-22
-- so it was interesting that both he and I had some of the
very same dark suspicions brewing in the back of our minds completely
independent of each other. I
think SFC Buswell raised a plausible hypothetical scenario worth
exploring openly with the public, even if the odds are perhaps
as low as 5-10% that it could reflect reality. But first, I
have to give the reader some background in order for our concerns
to make sense to anyone. If nothing else, this background provides
an important perspective on the kind of corruption that exists
in the American establishment today that could help make an
Oslo-Utoya false flag attack possible. It also provides some
additional ideological background to the "Info War"
aspects of the 7-22 tragedy, to include the comic book versions
of "neo-Nazi conspiracy theories" originally attributed
to Anders Breivik that were touted by major U.S. and UK-based
media. I
got involved in a house share situation in western Pennsylvania
with de Nugent and his former fiance Margaret Huffstickler in
January 2009 before I knew anything about his Nazi Party membership
background as a college student. I originally met de Nugent
at the Barnes Review/American
Free Press Conference held in Washington, D.C. in September
2006, an event open to the general public attended by people
with a wide variety of political, ethnic, and religious backgrounds.
I met for the first time or saw in attendance people like DU
expert Dr. Doug Rokke (who I have archived here),
former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson, William
Rodriguez ("Last Survivor To Exit The North Tower Of
The World Trade Center"), the late Joan Veon (who ran the
"Women's International
Media Group," see Leuren Moret obituary for Ms. Veon
here),
Dr. Fredrick Toben (profiled in some detail along with John
de Nugent in Chapter
34 of my Mission of Conscience
series), John
Stadtmiller (head of the Republic Broadcasting Network based
in Austin, TX), some leaders of Neturei
Karta (Orthodox Jews United Against Zionism), and the legendary
author Eustace
Mullins (I wound up driving him back to his home in Staunton,
Virginia). De
Nugent had once worked as a fund raiser as well as as journalist
for AFP/Barnes Review founder Willis Carto, and according
to his own online biography, "In June-August 1990,
de Nugent, using the campaign name `Jack Nugent,' ran in the
Republican primary for Congress in the Sixth District of Tennessee,
south and east of Nashville, on a pro-white platform. He achieved
26.7 percent of the vote, albeit de Nugent suspects that massive
elecronic vote fraud denied him an outright victory on primary
day, August 10, 1990." As noted in the MP3 section on my
author
archive web page, he interviewed me on his Voice of Reason
Radio Network Show on 30 April 2008. (2 hours, 10 min. 61 MB
file. Download Here).
De
Nugent came across as a suave and knowledgable personality on
the American Right. When he found out that I was looking for
another place to stay, he called me up many times and pitched
the virtues of his houseshare situation in "the great White
bastion" of western Pennsylvania with his former fiance
Margaret Huffstickler (pictured here
on his "Joan of Arc" web page in the kitchen). I thought
it would be interesting to get to know him better as a fellow
journalist and writer for the American Free Press and
The Barnes Review. I also had personal and professional
reasons why I thought it might be advantageous to be closer
to major metropolitan areas like Pittsburgh and Washington,
D.C. than I had previously been on the west coast of Washington
State (for example, I run the web site michaelcollinspiper.com
to support one of AFP's star journalists based in Washington,
D.C.). I
have to credit de Nugent with putting together a very good web
page here
which makes excellent points related to Caucasian "Solutreans"
in America prior to Mongoloid Indians, but at the same time
(pardon me for repeating myself) I want to distance myself politically
from de Nugent's infatuation with promoting "National Socialism
2.0." More
recently, de Nugent has been flirting with National Socialism
for African Americans. Adolf Hitler had Negroes and Jews in
his Wehrmacht, believe it or not. See the book "Black
Nazis!A Study of Racial Ambivalence in Nazi Germany's
Military Establishment: Non-German Ethnic Minority and Foreign
Volunteers, Conscripts, Laborers and POWs, 1940-1945
by Veronica Clark and also Hitler's
Jewish Soldiers:The Untold Story of
Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military
by Bryan Mark Rigg. I
believe there is no point in de Nugent ever promoting National
Socialism for Jews, since they are already over their eyeballs
into a very criminal and predatory version of this "genetic
top down" ideological perspective with Zionism.,
and it is doubtful that the innate crookedness and subterranean
viciousness within the Jewish character will ever allow Jews
to follow an honest and productive version of any
ideology -- to include "honest" versions of "National
Socialism." (Just look at how Jewish
Bolsheviks horrifically perverted "Communism" in Russia,
and Jewish
"neo-cons" have completely fouled up "conservatism"
in America with "neo-con" ideology, as Mike Piper
documents inThe
High Priests of War). "Bibi"
Netanyahu's reckless lunacy and treachery most likely includes
such "credits" as New York 9/11 and London 7/7 in
addition to Oslo-Utoya 7-22. His warmongering against Iraq,
Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Iran, and other Muslim countries is enough
to make Adolf Hitler blush. Israel is such an intensely tribalistic,
cronyistic, militaristic and socialistic country, not to mention
a perpetual economic basket case forever dependent on wheedling
massive foreign aid out of other countries to make ends meet,
that no one can realistically envision any time in the future
when Israel might ever earn its own way in this world as an
honest, productive, "good neighbor" country. Israel
seems destined to forever be an extremely dangerous and duplicitous
parasite on humanity and a prime trouble-maker in this world.
Please see "Israel
is a Lunatic State," an RT interview with
Jewish-American critic Norman Finkelstein. There
were a number of really interesting guests who passed through
de Nugent's place while I was in the house share situation from
January - June 2009 and again from July 2010 to June 2011. During
the first stay, I met Henrik Holappa who had been invited to
come from Finland to the U.S. by John de Nugent. Holappa was
the founder of the "Finnish Resistance Movement" which
is allied with the "Swedish
Resistance Movement." While riding in a car with John
de Nugent, Holappa got picked up by U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials and
deported back to Finland. The reasons ostensibly involved a
technicality pertaining to the filing date of Holappa's immigration
papers, but in reality they involved his politics. I wrote an
article "Confronting
Government Terror,"Lone
Star Iconoclast, 20 May 2009, about my efforts to
help protect Holappa's rights. Please see my Henrik
Holappa web page for more details. During
my second stay, in early 2011, John de Nugent surprised me by
inviting an African / Egyptian-looking person named Clark
Lightbridge from Los Angeles. He showed up unannounced (to
me, at least) to stay at his house for several months to help
de Nugent put together a special
"spiritual" video series, perhaps in an effort
to help defuse public suspicions that he is some kind of inflexible
white nationalist / white racist as well as just to get work
done. Prior
to this, de Nugent had played up on the Internet the idea that
he had found an overwhelmingly white "refuge" for
European Americans in western Pennsylvania. He had also discussed
an apparent historic pattern where the original white "Solutrean"
settlers in North America would build up civilizations with
their unique innovativeness, but then over time they would become
victims of their own naivete and lack of racial loyalty by increasingly
relying on nonwhites as their labor force. The nonwhites would
inevitably outbreed the white overclass, and then once they
gained numeric superiority, they would at some point jump the
whites and cut their throats and take over, only to later lament
how the truly creative people were now either dead or or driven
off, and the once vibrant civilization was now falling into
stagnation and savagery.
I had also discussed with de Nugent how Nordic (and closely
related Celtic) peoples tend to have fragile indigneous cultures
and weak ethnic identities. They seem to need to ingather and
reestablish their own ethnic and cultural homogeneity and integrity
on the home front before they can gain traction anywhere else.
They can certainly work with other racial and ethnic groups
as part of a confederation of indigenous peoples, but first
they need to create their own homogeneous "inner sanctum,"
that is, organize themselves internally based upon common culture,
ethnicity, race, and indigenous values before they can effectively
reach out to other tribal groups and work with them while simultaneously
preserving and defending their own unique tribal existence
and heritage. In
view of all these considerations, perhaps the reader can now
appreciate the sense of surprise (if not "shock")
I experienced when I walked outside my room and saw a black
(or "Egyptian") person standing within the "inner
sanctum" of de Nugent's self-anointed "white bastion"
of western Pennsylvania "headquarters." De Nugent
informed me that, Oh, by the way, this individual has been helping
him with his web site for the last two years (news
to me), and he is from Los Angeles (again, news to me, I have
never heard of him before), and even though de Nugent had never
met him before in person (even though he was helping him on
his web site), this individual was now welcome to stay as long
as he wanted, and furthermore de Nugent expected me to defer
to him and be hospitable in every way possible (just like he
expected me to "understand" when he forged
a letter in German in my name to German Member of Parliament
Erika Steinbach in September 2010). Last, but not least, de
Nugent announced that he was changing his "white nationalist"
political philsophy to be more of pan-racial thing that can
confer 'honorary Aryan" status to nonwhites and operate
more on a universalistic "spiritual" rather than an
ethnic or racially based tribal level. Once,
while sitting at a kitchen table with Clark Lightbridge, and
while Margaret Huffstickler (de Nugent's longstanding "fiance")
happened to be standing nearby, I mentioned to Clark that I
have strong paleoconservative ideological leanings, and consistent
with my principles, I asked if John de Nugent had ever reviewed
the "indigenous confederate" concept with him. This
is a political formula that many nationalists like to use in
working with nationalists of other racial, ethnic, or national
groups. (It
is worth making a lengthy aside here to illustrate some important
historical and ideological points, particularly in regard to
the important case of South Africa. Certain Afrikaner nationalist
groups [or "white tribes"] tried to ally themselves
as "fellow indigneous peoples" with various Zulu groups
to oppose the Communist African National Congress [ANC] takeover.
Unfortunately they were completely overpowered, in that the
highly infiltrated Dutch Reformed Church turned against them,
as did high level South African government traitors like former
South African prime minister F.
W. de Klerk. According to a back issue of the old SPOTLIGHT
[predecessor of The
American Free Press], the U.S. embassy in South Africa
was used as a major command center by Mossad-CIA to wage an
extremely aggressive covert campaign in support of the ANC communists,
to include the use of massive bribery, and even assassinations.
The Communist ANC was also supported by the Rothschild-Oppenheimer
family "Octopus," which I will cover later, and by
a massive smear campaign against traditional South African white
conservatives waged by Jewish Hollywood. Regardless of ones
political views regarding South Africa before the ANC takeover,
one thing is clear; South Africa has gone from having been the
most technologically and economically advanced country in Africa
to now just being another African basket case country -- just
as most racial nationalists expected. As
an additional aside, many readers may be shocked by the idea
that Mossad-CIA actively supported the anti-white communist
overthrow of South Africa, since the mostly white U.S. had apparently
fought the Cold War to contain Communism. In addition,
apartheid
South Africa had alled itself with Israel on many levels,
to include atomic bomb development. However,
none of this should be surprising at all, since duplicitious,
perfidious, and totally psychopathic behavior has always been
the norm among high level Jews. Jewish plutocrats helped finance
both sides of the Napoleonic Wars. The Jewish "Wall
Street super capitalist" Jacob Schiff based in New York
City was
a key financier of the Bolshevik Revolution. Also consider
the bizarre
case of the Jewish CEO of Occidental Petroleum, Armand Hammer.
He flip-flopped back and forth between serving as "The
Man Who Knew Lenin" who negotiated trade deals that bailed
out the Bolsheviks, to posing as a "super capitalist"
and close friend high of level U.S. Government officials. In
By
Way of Deception by former Mossad Officer Victor Ostrovsky,
we learn how Mossad was simultaneously arming and training opposing
factions in places like Sri Lanka and Lebanon. The list of examples
going back to ancient times is endless, but suffice to say that
in the case of South Africa, global Jewish leaders decided that
it was in their best tactical interest to ruthlessly oppose
all forms white nationalism anywhere in the world and to make
an "example" out of the South African apartheid system.
[Never mind that the Israeli system of anti-Palestinian apartheid
has always been off the charts compared to anything implemented
by Afrikaners towards blacks: See Life
of An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel
by Jack Bernstein, the RT segment Israel
admits it harvested organs of dead Palestinians,
Leuren Moret's account of radiation
warfare waged against Gaza -- not to mention global depopulation
radiation warfare measures applied against Iraq, Japan (via
Stuxnet virus sabotage) and other countries by Mossad-CIA,
myriad accounts of random
torture and murder of Palestinian children -- the list of
Israeli genocidal activities and other forms of institutionalized
cruelty and inhumanity is a very long one]. Of
course the Jewish Oppenheimer family, head of natural resource
cartels and business conglomerates that so thoroughly penetrated
and controlled so many aspects of the South African economy
that it remains known as "The
Octopus" (it was also an inspiration for the James
Bond novel Diamonds Are Forever) played along with
this anti-white diktat of Zionist Central. The Octopus and it
international Jewish central banker connections have more than
enough money to buy off Mandela and control his communist friends
and restructure adequate deals behind the scenes to protect
their own interests; it is just regular white folks in South
Africa -- as well as black people dependent on an economy capably
of steady growth and job creation and who lacked the ability
to protect themselves from the downside of Mossad-CIA-MI6 intrigues
-- both these types of whites and blacks got the dirt end of
the stick. The
upshot of all this is that no matter how hard Norwegians try
to be friendly and supportive of Jews and Israel, it is virtually
guaranteed that they will eventually get stabbed in the back
just like Afrikaners -- or
the Icelanders -- and sure enough it happened
on 7-22! In the final analysis, partnering with the
Jewish New World Order is always a Pact with the Devil. Thus
concludes my lengthy aside; now back to the question I posed
to Clark Lightbridge. He responded "No." I mentioned
that I used to work as a real estate broker, and a big part
of contractual ethics involves reviewing all key terms and conditions
before assuming a working relationship or closing a deal. I
mentioned that while it is great whenever nonwhites want to
help out whites (I hate to look a gift horse in the mouth!),
nevertheless, if Clark were to devote all his time towards supporting
de Nugent's brand of white nationalism without any assurances
of adequate financial compensation and without any explicit
agreement regarding dual support for black (or Egyptian) nationalist
(or "community")-related causes, then this could be
construed as a form of exploitation. I would be willing
to bet that if any famous black nationalist leaders like Marcus
Garvey or Malcolm
X were alive and listening to this conversation, they would
agree with me. Louis
Farrakhan probably would too, although I have never been
in contact with him to find out for sure. At
this point Margaret Huffstickler started laughing, saying that
I sounded like some kind of left wing labor union organizer
who was reading Clark the riot act to prevent him from being
used as an "Uncle
Tom." The
following are references I have also listed on my ObamaNation
web page that provide valuable additional background on
the tragedy of South Africa. In this particular case, blacks
were deceived by false promises of Jews (so what else is new?),
and Mossad-CIA-MI6 subverted another country in addition to
Norway on 7-22. (Again, so what else is new? The list of countries
which have been "thugged" by Mossad-CIA-MI6 is virtually
endless, particularly in support of usurious international "economic
hit man" and "blood
banker" operations).
Nelson
Mandela (center)
giving communist salute alongside Joe
Slovo (rt.), Jewish leader of the South African Communist
Party
2008-06-24
Mandela: The Legend and the Legacy: Part I,
see also Part
II by Sarah Maid of Albion. How the once most
prosperous country in Africa was turned into another Third
World hell hole with over a million whites having already
fled the country, two million reduced to grinding poverty,
rampant theft and murder everywhere, and worse things yet
to come. Generally the historical pattern has been once nonwhites
become the voting majority, nonwhite leaders become the permanent
norm. They tend to naturally revert to Marxist-socialist policies
(remember that anthropological "bigmanship" phenomenon
described earlier on this web page?) that ultimately suck
whites completely dry in favor of nonwhites.
2007-11-23 Ian
Smith the last White leader of Rhodesia disappears into a
crack in the sky at 88. "After years of
political contortions and external pressure from the British
and US governments, free elections were held in early 1980
in which Mugabe's Zanu-PF swept to victory, winning most of
the seats in the new parliament. Nkomo’s Zapu held on
to its Ndebele strongholds and formed the opposition. Smith's
Rhodesia Front claimed all 20 reserved seats in a reflex vote
by the white electorate. At first it seemed that Smith's dire
predictions about the future might prove to be ill-founded.
Despite Mugabe's inflammatory rhetoric, whites kept their
land and foreign investment was encouraged. Smith continued
to excoriate Mugabe as a Marxist dictator, but was seen as
an increasingly irrelevant figure. In 1987, he was expelled
from parliament for 12 months after criticising sanctions
imposed on neighbouring South Africa. By the time his suspension
was lifted, the whites had lost their seats in parliament.
During the 1990s, as Mugabe’s regime became increasingly
corrupt and violent, Smith took a grim delight in seeing his
predictions come true. `It helps lift my depression that the
majority of black people are saying it is time to get rid
of this bunch of corrupt gangsters,' he said. In his memoirs,
The Great Betrayal (1997), he put the blame for Rhodesia’s
collapse on almost everybody except himself. `During UDI we
had the greatest national spirit in the world, a fantastic
country, great race relations, the happiest black faces in
the world … if our friends hadn’t betrayed us,
we’d have won,' he wrote."
2006-12-01 The
Negro-Jewish Alliance that Destroyed Rhodesia.
Instead of Obama-Rahmbo, it was Mugabe-Hoogstraten, and the
results were bone-chilling. A poster-board summary from judicial-inc.biz.
2003-06-14 First
Things First by Kevin Strom. The subversion of
the Dutch Reformed Church was an important factor in the destruction
of white-ruled South Africa.
Like
I said earlier, one of my original objectives in getting involved
in a houseshare situation with de Nugent was to get to know
him better, and I was certainly getting what I asked for. In
addition, there were quite a few other very interesting things
that I discovered about de Nugent. He has held a very positive
opinion of former FBI regional director for Los Angeles and
COINTELPRO chieftain Ted
Gunderson (who almost succeeded J. Edgar Hoover), and spoke
with him about once a month before he died on July 31, 2011.
Ted Gunderson also received a very positive obituary from the
American Free Press,
and I have heard very positive opinions from other activists
besides de Nugent about Gunderson as well. This
is a very different viewpoint than what is presented by Sherri
Kane and Leonard G. Horowitz in Child-Trafficking
& Sex Scandal Exposes A Justice Department Cover-up Administered
by Officials in the CIA and FBI. Dr. Horwowitz
states:
This
is a lesson in how the CIA/FBI's counter-intelligence program
(i.e., COINTELPRO) operates to control opposition, and is
the only way to reconcile Gunderson's and his group's behavior--lamely
protesting government corruption, while limply indicting the
Illuminati, the CIA, and Aquino's satanic child-trafficking
network," said Dr. Horowitz, a Harvard trained behavioral
science expert, libeled by Gunderson's agents across the Internet.
(CLICK
HERE to read Side Bar #1 explaining how and why Horowitz
and Kane chose to investigate Gunderson following the assassination
of Edward Harle (a.k.a., Christopher Story), a Bush family
nemesis and world leading financial industries whistleblower.) This
illustrates how modern propagandists serve to confuse people,
discrediting all sources of intelligence, to generate general
apathy. This is precisely how Gunderson -- a professional
mind-controlled disinformation agent, hypnotized to feign
activism and spread government hate -- infiltrated the grassroots
with his team of agents to generate fear, controversy, and
apathy, thus securing the CIA's entire rogue operation that
is kidnapping and killing children," Dr. Horowitz concluded.
Dr.
Horowitz, who knew Gunderson personally, was shocked to learn
that he directed the network of agent provocateurs libeling
him. "I
thought Gunderson was 'good guy,'" Horowitz said. "It
is stunning he lied about his marriage to LaVey's ex-wife,
and his association with Aquino all these years. His appearance
and poor performance with Aquino on Geraldo makes perfect
sense now. His links to satanism, disinformation, and the
CIA/FBI's COINTELPRO implicates higher ups from Capitol Hill
to the Vatican." A
Vatican involvement was expressed by John DeCamp, Gunderson,
and his chronies. DeCamp, in fact, admitted during a videotaped
interview having high level Vatican connections that provided
the opportunity to discuss "the problem" of widespread
pedophilia with the Roman Catholic Church's Cardinal Ratzinger,
later elected Pope. Ratzinger told DeCamp that the problem
"was out of control." Pressures were then brought
on the Court, that helps to explain why DeCamp simply said,
"the judge threw it out, dismissed, let out the Church
and the priest" guilty of pedophilia in the Archdiocese.
Dr.
Horowitz and Sherri Kane are not the only ones who have made
serious allegations against Ted Gunderson. Wesley
Hoyt, currently the defense attorney for imprisoned activist
attorney Edgar Steele, claimed during his interviews with James
Kelso in fall 2010 that an undercover team led by Ted Gunderson
traveled to Idaho to frame and bear false testimony against
another one of his clients, namely David Hinkson, who got unjustly
railroaded into a lengthy prison sentence that has landed him
in the Colorado SuperMax prison. Hoyt claims that Hinkson had
become wealthy enough in running his own business to become
particularly effective as a traditional American conservative
activist, and that our "New World Order" government
felt threatened enough by this type of patriot to use dirty
tricks to shut him down. My
personal opinion from extensive personal research is that there
is strong evidence that the FBI unjustly framed Edgar Steele
and may have even recklessly endangered the life of his wife
Cyndi by planting a live car bomb on her vehicle via an FBI
informant. It also appears that the FBI fabricated a voice recording
used as key evidence to convict Steele, and the FBI also leaned
on a corrupt judge to prevent expert witnesses from discrediting
this phony "evidence." (For more on the Edgar Steele
case, please go to free-edgar-steele.com.
For more on the David Hinkson case, see RolandHinksonfiles.com.)
I
felt so disturbed by the way the FBI went after Edgar Steele
that I personally transcribed the two interviews below that
appear among other articles that I posted to my "Suppressed
Nationalists" web page:
In
many respects, the frame-up of First Amendment attorney Edgar
Steele was a "chopped-off horse head" (referring,
of course, to the famous scene near the beginning of Francis
Ford Coppola's classic film TheGodfather)
laid at the foot of the bed of free speech activists in America
(particularly WASPs) who dare to publicly protest the rapidly
encroaching police state, just like Oslo-Utoya was an international
"horse head" delivered to Norway regarding its too-independent
posture in the eyes of the New World Order. At the very highest
levels, it is the same criminal-monopolist mentality that plays
dirty ticks on American dissidents that also attacked Norway. In
his Dec 6, 2010 interview with Cyndi Steele, her lawyer (at
that time) Wesley Hoyt, and Roland Hinkson (the father of the
falsely charged and imprisoned David Hinkson), the talk show
host Jamie Kelso explained a seven step standard operating procedure
for railroading innocent people (please see my full transcript
of the interview here):
Jamie Kelso: Here is some of the steps
as I understand them. What these prosecutors will do, state
or federal, first [step] they will get a
patriot on some nominal violation or charge. Step
two, they will get a cooperating witness. Someone
who -- a corrupt person, who for money or some other favor
will on hearsay testimony accuse the innocent person of a
crime they did not commit. In this case, Mr. Steele's case,
it is not a nominal violation. They are accusing him of attempting
to murder his wife. They have the cooperating witness Larry
Fairfax. Then a third step that they will
take is that once, as they file these charges, they will then
bring in inflated charges to scare the judge, so that you,
the patriot, being held in prison, will now be denied bail,
and will therefore not be able to defend yourself as Edgar
Steele is not able to now, even though he is a great attorney.
So they get the bail off with some inflated, made-up story,
that you are a threat to the public. Totally untrue. Step
Four, with this, they are now where they have got
you in jail, they are scaring off your own friends, your own
network, even your own family. Being frightened, terrified,
and silenced. And then the next step [five]
is they will then bring in new charges while you are in incarceration,
bring in new charges as you attempt to defend yourself and
communicate with your family and your friends. Charges such
as witness tampering simply by talking with people trying
to help yourself. Then the next step, I have got this listed
as step six, the kangaroo court itself where
all sorts of procedures can be followed to defeat actual real
justice. You, the defendant, having now been imprisoned, can
go to court without proper representation. Without the proper
preparation for your case, whereas the prosecutor has an unlimited
budget to go after you. Then there is a following step, a
sentencing step [seven] where patriots can
be given maximum sentences, and piled on maximum sentences.
Leuren
Moret has informed me that based upon her contact with Ted
Gunderson at public conferences, as well as feedback from other
West Coast activists (in her sphere in Berkeley, California
they tend to be on the Left), she thinks the aforementioned
works by Kane and Horowitz are on target. Needless to say, this
has raised serious question about the extent to which I might
want to identify with Ted Gunderson as an alleged "fellow
Norwegian-American" -- the complexities of Gunderson's
career certainly merit more research. I do not know to what
extent Gunderson was playing a double game of "hold your
friends close, hold your enemies closer" and ultimately
netted out more on "our side" than "the Dark
Side". (Playing both sides of the fence is actually fairly
common in the intelligence and counterintelligence worlds).
Or perhaps Gunderson himself may have been manipulated by someone
at a higher level, as Dr. Horowitz alleges. At this point I
do not have clear answers for these kinds of questions.
The
FBI itself has been under increased scrutiny in recent years
based on strong evidence that it has been a major leader in
conducting false flag attacks. The following article "The
FBI Fosters, Funds and Equips American Terrorists"
by James Corbett, The Corbett Report, 17 April 2013, provides
an excellent summary:
People
around the world watched in horror this week as explosions
rocked the finish line of the Boston Marathon, turning a day
of sportsmanship and celebration into one of shock, grief
and outrage. As with all such events, the desire to discover
who was behind this cowardly act has driven many into a speculative
frenzy. And, in a sad reminder of the indoctrination that
the Western world has been under for over a decade now in
the mythical “war of terror,” it did not take long at all
before the collective finger of the mob was pointed squarely
in the direction of Muslim terrorists. Within
hours of the blast, fear spread throughout the international
Muslim community that the bombing would be connected to an
Islamist extremist. A Libyan Twitter user touched a nerve—and
received thousands of retweets and worldwide media coverage—by
tweeting
“Please don’t be a ‘Muslim.’” The backlash began shortly thereafter,
with the New York Post falsely
implying that a Saudi national was being questioned for
his possible role in the attack. The next day, a plane departing
Boston Logan Airport returned to the gate and two passengers
were forcibly
removed because they had been overheard speaking Arabic
before takeoff. As
data continues to pour in regarding the bombing and who may
be behind it, it is instructive to take a moment to step back
and consider this knee-jerk tendency to conclude that this
is the work of Islamic radicals. In the minds of millions
of Americans, bombs targeting innocents on US soil are inextricably
linked with the image of the bearded, turban-wearing boogeyman
that has become the shorthand for evil in this age of terror. This
association is not only incorrect, it is dangerously incorrect
because it signally fails to identify the one unifying thread
between all of the recent terror plots in the US. Lurking
behind the shadowy armies of would-be jihadis in the popular
imagination is the sober reality that every single major terror
bust in the United States since 9/11 has sourced back to the
same group, a single entity that has in every single case
funded, equipped and even incited the would-be terrorists
into action: the FBI. In
2005, federal prosecutors charged Michael Reynolds, a 47 year
old drifter living with his elderly mother, of attempting
to wage jihad on the US by blowing up fuel facilities. In
reality, his plan for jihad was little more than a series
of conversations he had on a Yahoo! Chat room with a US judge
posing as a militant. He was arrested after agreeing to meet
with an FBI informant who had promised him $40,000 for his
cause, and two months later the FBI quietly
announced he was likely mentally ill. He was eventually
convicted and is curently serving 25 years in jail. In
2007 the so-called “Fort Dix Six” were nabbed in a much-hyped
FBI terror bust after allegedly hatching a plan to attack
a US military base and kill the soldiers there. At the time,
a 26-page indictment revealed
that the group had “no rigorous military training” and “did
not appear close to being able to pull off an attack.” The
next year it was revealed
that the FBI informant who had infiltrated the group had in
fact offered to organize the members and lead the plot itself. In
2009 the Newburgh Four were arrested for an alleged plot to
blow up synagogues and shoot down military airplanes in Newburgh,
New York. The group was a ragtag bunch of poor black men,
at least one of whom was mentally unstable and stored his
own urine in jars around his apartment. The group’s fifth
member, Shahad Hussein, turned out to be an FBI
informant who had promised the members hundreds of thousands
of dollars to carry out the plot. In sentencing the defendants,
Federal Judge Colleen McMahon said:
“[The
government] created acts of terrorism out of [the defendant's]
fantasies of bravado and bigotry, and then made those fantasies
come true. The government did not have to infiltrate and
foil some nefarious plot – there was no nefarious plot to
foil.”
In
November 2010 the FBI busted the so-called Portland Christmas
Tree Bomber, who was allegedly attempting to bomb the lighting
ceremony at Portland’s Pioneer Courthouse Square. “The threat
was very real,” the FBI intoned
at the time. “Our investigation shows that Mohamud was absolutely
committed to carrying out an attack on a very grand scale.”
The alleged bomber, Arthur Balizan, turned
out to be a teenager who bragged to undercover agents
that he could get a gun because he was a “rapper” and wrote
an article on workout tips for jihadis. In
2011 the FBI arrested
a man that they themselves had supplied with a remote controlled
plane and C4 explosives in a harebrained attempt to bomb the
Pentagon. In 2012 they busted
another would-be jihadi that they again had supplied with
a fake gun and suicide vest. Also in 2012 the FBI busted
a group of five “anarchists” who were allegedly going to bomb
a bridge in the Cleveland area, although it was quietly admitted
that the FBI informant who had infiltrated the group had in
fact initiated the contact with them and been present at the
meetings where they developed the plan to blow up the bridge.
One
of the most ridiculous
examples of this pattern dates back to 2006, when the
DOJ attempted to make it seem as if they had just nabbed a
group of dangerous jihadis who were preparing a full ground
war against the United States. The
picture that is painted by these facts is as overwhelming
as it is difficult for much of the public to comprehend. The
conclusion, nevertheless, is incontrovertible: that without
the FBI, many of the so-called “terrorist cells” that have
been hatching their inept, bumbling schemes against the United
States for decades might never have existed at all. Despite
what many would believe, this conclusion is not even controversial.
Rather, it has been backed up time and again by evidence
in the official record and multiplyattested
to by FBI insiders and whistleblowers themselves. Given
all of this damning history and insider whistleblowing, it
is vital that the Western public break out of their media-induced
programming and question the core assumptions of the war on
terror paradigm that we have been programmed with for decades
now. If there is to be speculation at all over events like
these, and if there is any group that has to present a thoroughgoing
case for why it is NOT responsible for this atrocity, surely
it is the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Having been at
the heart of so many terror plots in the past, both the hilariously
inept and the chillingly successful, how could the public
refuse to even interrogate the organization that has the most
to answer for? The
simple fact of the matter is that the history of the modern
age of terrorism has proven time and again that the FBI is
the prime suspect in any terrorist atrocity that takes place
on American soil. Let us all keep this in mind as the details
of the investigations into this (and all other) American terrorist
incidents begins to emerge.
Getting
back to Leuren Moret, she has appeared
in videos and given talk show interviews on CIA mind control
and shares my concerns about de Nugent. In fact, before I left
de Nugent's place on June 5, 2011, she told me that she was concerned
that de Nugent could be under mind control and that Ted Gunderson
was trying to set me up. She said that both the FBI and CIA (and
their MI6-Mossad allies/handlers) like to find narcissistic, unstable,
and psychopathic people that they can control and use them to
infiltrate, steer, and taint political dissident movements on
all ends of the political spectrum as part of the "full spectrum
dominance" game. They actually created their own
supply of such people with fractured personality personalities
through the MK-Ultra program, and continue to use various forms
of mind control to this very day. In more recent times, Leuren
Moret thinks that people like Gundersen have pretended to be right
wing patriots, when in actuality they are "talent scouts"
look for people with character flaws that they can control or
develop relationships with. They give these people funding from
the government's nearly unlimited coffers (that is, until the
privately owned Federal Reserve fiat money system finally goes
down in an inflationary spiral). The CIA and FBI COINTELPRO want
to buy the loyalty and boost the effectiveness of dysfunctional
people in order to mislead any political movements that might
challenge the establishment (no matter where they are on the political
spectrum), while simultaneously using intelligence gathered from
these sources to find ways to taint honest and effective activists
in ways that don't leave government fingerprints. This can include
using the people they support to launch smear campaigns or acting
asagents
provocateurs against honest and effective people.
Although there may
be some controversy about the authenticity of
the quote above, the fact that it sounds plausible to many
people who are familiar with Mossad-CIA-MI6 PSYOPs should
in itself be instructive, just like the quote attributed to
former CIA director William Colby below:
The CIA
and FBI, guided by the Rothschilds/City of London/MI6/Mossad
nexus, have effectively become secular versions of the totally
corrupt and totalitarian Catholic Church of medieval period
that sparked the Protestant Reformation. The Roman Catholic
Church got its fingers into everything -- politics,
economics, popular culture -- and ruthlesslessly squeezed
out any religious competition, to include burning and torturing
untold numbers of "heretics" while waging phony
wars against "devils." In early medieval France,
the Catholic Church monopolized land ownership and education,
forbade bathing, squandered national resources on militarist
religious crusades, and reduced living standards to below
the Neolithic Age. In 16th and 17th century Poland, a Jewish-Catholic
alliance reduced the Polish people to the worst form of slavery
in Europe (see additional discussion in Chapter
5 of the Mission of Conscience series).
The Jewish-Catholic takeover of America in the 20th century
has reduced WASPs to another minority (see my discussion of
anti-Nordic
genocide in America) while bolstering the Catholic
population and uplifting Jewish Power to unparalleled heights.
It has effectively reversed the political independence achieved
by both the American Revolution and the Protestant Reformation.
More recently it has waged a phony war against "terror."
"Al Qaeda" was originally created by the CIA --and
in one of the most bizarre twists in history-- the U.S. supported
"Al Qaeda" in Libya and Syria while ostensibly fighting
against it in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. Today both
the CIA and FBI are top heavy with Jews, crypto Jews, Catholics,
and Mormons (who tend to be blindly obedient towards Zionist
interests). This motley "Liberal Minority Coalition"
continues to envy WASPs and support policies that increase
WASP marginalization and dispossession.
Speaking
of mind control techniques, I maintain that the most powerful
forms "hide in plain sight," that is, consist of
controlled corporate media and infiltrated "alternative
media" that feed Americans a very distorted view of reality
on a daily basis. Such media and controlled "alternative
media" have already gone to great lengths to cover up
the 9/11 "inside job" (see Chapter
7 and Chapter
8 of my Mission of Conscience series),
the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City Bombing, Sandy Hook,
and other "black ops." There are also more subtle
but nevertheless dangerous mind control methods that are also
being used, such as mind-control version of HAARP, EMF transmissions,
and "sound of silence" programming (please see my
discussion
of this in Chapter 39 of my Mission of Conscience
series). Don't forget compulsory
mass medication through fluoridation of public drinking
water (fluoride was used
for cockroach control in the U.S. prior to 1900 and has
been a key
component in rat poison; and it was also reportedly used
in Nazi and Soviet concentration camps to pacify prisoners),
the widespread
use of toxic vaccines, and the aggressive use of statin,
psychotropic, and other mind-altering drugs by the medical/pharmaceutical
complex in Brave
New World America. In
any event, Leuren Moret said the situation is so bad that
political activists are generally better off forming their
inner circle among longstanding friends and relatives if at
all possible rather than strangers. As
an aside, speaking of developing activist contacts, for those
who might be wondering how I got involved with Leuren Moret,
I was introduced to her by Dr. Doug Rokke (a fellow Norwegian
American and leading DU activist, please see archive page
that I created for him here)
after let him know that I was interested in organizing a symposium
on Fukushima or otherwise networking with activists to raise
public awareness of the Fukushima danger. Although certain
people think that I have expressed views that are "well
to the right of norms," in fact I am ideologically eclectic
and find myself working at times with people from many different
political and ideological backgrounds. In regard to false
flag threates, I worked with Capt.
Eric May regarding, who leans towards anarcho-libertarianism,
and in regard to Fukushima, I have worked with Leuren Moret,
who is part of the "Left Coast" scene. In the notes
to the transcript of my 10 Jan 2013 interview titled "The
Fukushima Coverup" hosted by Christina Consolo
(the "RadChick") of Nuked Radio, I observed that
Leuren Moret is
from Venus, and I am from Mars, but regardless of any
ideological or gender differences we still all have to work
together to help save humanity from common dangers. (One area
where I do share a strong ideological commonality with Ms.
Moret is our strong belief that whistleblowers should be respected
and protected. In addition, she shares my disenchantment with
the Vatican, especially given that her French ancestors were
Huguenots/Protestants who were heavily persecuted and ultimately
criminalized or expelled from France by the Catholic establishment.
See French
Wars of Religion and Edict
of Fontainebleau in Wikipedia).
John
de Nugent (web site johndenugent.com)
claims to be the son of Marine Corps Colonel, is fluent in
French and German as well as his native tongue English, and
is in touch with radical right wing activists around the world.
He has also gone public with the fact that he was molested
as a kid and underwent major trauma. De
Nugent informed me in early 2011 that he was so traumatized
as a child that he cannot remember anything before age 10,
and major portions of his memory have been blotted out. He
sometimes wonders if he has had MK ULTRA programming, and
admitted as much to myself and Margaret Huffstickler in an
email. I told him that going public with all of this would
help to insure that he is not subject to manipulation,
and in fact within a few weeks after Oslo-Utoya 7-22 I sent
John an email asking him to go ahead and go public with everything.
John
is a great public speaker and can be very charming. I have
liked John as a person (or at least that part of his psyche
that is presumably free of programming), and think he writes
very good articles like Psychopathy
& History, Barnes Review Jan-Feb
2007, and Hell
in the Huertgen:The
Story of American Soldiers Squandered In the Huertgen Forest
by Gen. Omar Bradley (PDF),
Barnes Review, Sept-Oct 2005 and does
a lot of other good
research and commentary, however, I also think it is wise
to take preventive measures to insure things don't go too
far off the deep end. (As one example, he forged and distributed
a provocative mass email letter in my name written in German,
please see Regarding
the BP-Gulf Catastrophe, We Must Clarify Our Real Enemies;
A Letter to Erika Steinbach, Member of the German Parliament--- a rebuttal to an unauthorized ghostwritten
letter, dated 24 Sept 2010, posted to my author
archive. Then despite this objection, on 8 Feb 2012 de
Nugent reposted
this unauthorized letter on his blog. I responded by sending
him a complaint and submitting a rebuttal for the commentary
section on this web page, which he may or may not approve
for publication). Henrik
Holappa, the Finnish nationalist activist who I have described
on my Henrik
Holappa archive web page, has also
voiced strong concerns about de Nugent going over the edge
as well as his potential to be part of a set-up. A key event
that helped trigger Holappa's decision to publicly criticize
de Nugent took place when he
felt that de Nugent was making an unwarranted attack on
Dr. David Duke. De
Nugent acknowledges
his attack on Duke in a rebuttal. The erratic shifts in
loyalties and vitriolic personal attacks involved in this
whole affair leaves me to wonder what might have been said
about me if I had arrived in Norway and become the target
of a false flag conspiracy story, a topic I will return to
later in this section. [In an earlier version of this article,
I wrote "The fact that Holappa was arrested in Bergen,
Norway and put into detention in Oct 2012 apparently on charges
of possessing firearms and ammunition in a mountain cabin
in Norway (for more details please see my Henrik
Holappa archive web page) suggests to me that Norwegian
police remain highly `politically motivated,' to say the least."
Now here is the update: it now appears that this story that
was originally related to me by de Nugent was a hoax. De Nugent
later said that Holappa was not arrested and was
not detained in Norway, although I have not heard
back from Holappa by email yet to hear his side of the story].
I
have been more tolerant of de Nugent in the past than I ordinarily
would be with most people for two major reasons. First, America
has too many opportunists and effete males who lack the guts
to publicly stand up to Zionist criminals and police state
operators on principle. Their cowardice has helped covert
America from the "Land of the Free and the Home of the
Brave" into the "Land of the Meek and the Home of
the Slave." If someone looks like they are a fighter,
I am willing to overlook some foibles. To paraphrase
President Abraham Lincoln, "Give 'em another keg
of whiskey!" ("Aware of Grant's victories on the
battlefield, Lincoln deftly parried rumors of Grant's drunkenness
by saying, `If I knew what brand of whiskey he drinks I would
send a barrel or so to some other generals.' Despite the appalling
casualties at Shiloh, and rumors of Grant's drunkenness on
the battlefield, Lincoln had also said of Grant `I can't spare
this man, he fights.'") Secondly, de Nugent has repeatedly
asserted publicly that he is a former U.S. Marine like myself
as well as a fellow journalist, writer, and activist for conservative
causes. [De Nugent supplied me with his Social Security Number
and invited me to request to obtain a copy of his military
record. The results so far which show his Marine Corps Reserve
record are provided on the web page "John
de Nugent military records and other biographical information."
I have not received anything yet pertaining to the
Army National Guard]. The best way to explain positive sentiments
that I have held towards de Nugent on this level is to refer
to the character Michael played by Robert de Niro in the movie
The
Deer Hunter, where Michael genuinely cares about
Nick (played by Chris Walken) as a fellow human being and
soldier and wants to short-stop any potential dark sides.
If de Nugent was subjected to MK ULTRA programming as a kid,
this is not his fault, and if this is true, I would like to
help him salvage the situation and break free. (So in other
words, instead of "All my best friends are Jewish,"
now the spoof line might be "All my best friends are
MK ULTRAs").
Scenes
from The
Deer Hunter. Michael, played by Robert de Niro, pictured
in the upper right, lower right, and lower left of the montage.
Nick, played by Chris Walken, pictured at the extreme left of
the upper left, and center right. Dialog
below from the climatic scene near the end of the movie
where Michael has returned to Saigon to find that Nick still
suffers from a very serious psychological problem: Nick wants
to embroil himself in another deadly game of Russian Roulette.
Michael:
I
came 12,000 miles back here to get you…What’s
the matter with you? Don’t you recognize me?…Nicky,
I love you, you’re my friend. What are you doing? We
don’t have much time, Nick. [Nick pulls the trigger
on a gun, clicking on an empty chamber] Is this what you want?
Is this what you want? I love you, Nick. [Michael pulls the
trigger, clicking on an empty chamber] Come on, Nicky, come
home. Just come home. Home. Talk to me. [looking at Nick’s
track marks] What did you do to your arms? Do you remember
the trees? Do you remember all the different ways of the trees?
Do you remember that? Do you remember? Huh? The mountains?
Do you remember all that? Nick: One shot. [He smiles and laughs in
recognition] Michael: One shot, one shot.
John
de Nugent reviews "Machete", published
on Sep 7, 2012 by heatseekerx51, YouTube caption "The great
American patriot John De Nugent gives us his review of the 2010
film, `Machete'"
Speaking
of The Deer Hunter and
Chris Walken, when I first became aware of the web site
announcing
Walken's alleged 2008 U.S. presidential candidacy (walken2008.com
is now defunct, but archived here),
I thought maybe the real life actor was consciously trying to
do political satire or grandstanding. It reminded me of my freshman
year at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1973
when the Vietnam War, Watergate scandal, and perhaps too much
pot and LSD on campus helped create a thoroughly cynical and
comical race for student body president. Many contenders had
preposterous names like "El Libre!," "Streaker"
(a nudist candidate), and "Mystery Politico." "El
Libre" was a student who dressed up like an insurgent with
a beret, black leather jacket, and toy submachine gun -- and
he won the election! Later
I found out that Walken declared the 2008 presidential candidacy
a hoax perpetrated by people he did not know, but before that
I thought "What the heck!" and sent him a letter saying
essentially "Check out John de Nugent, he reminds me of
a lot of roles you have played and he is also running
for president!" So
far I have not received a response, which is what I expect given
the leftist slant of most Hollywood actors and the fact that
the 2008 candidacy was not Walken's idea. Nevertheless, back
in 2008 I was toying with the whimsical idea that a joint ticket
of some one like a Chris Walken and John de Nugent might grab
a lot of national attention and help to wake a lot of people
up even if only meant as satirical political theater and grandstanding.
As a former real estate broker and stock broker, I am used to
throwing ideas up against the wall to see what sticks, even
if the chances of any kind of response are very low percentage.
Previous to my letter to Walken, de Nugent had invited me to
be his vice presidential running mate over long distance telephone! Now
that I am much more aware of CIA and FBI COINTELPRO involvement
in domestic politics, it is much harder for me to view the American
political scene with the same sense of humor as a Saturday
Night Live skit, particularly in view of all the false
flag ops and FBI setups identified in my Mission of Conscience
series. Please also see Dr.
Paul Craig Roberts: FBI only catch 'Terrorists' that They recruit!
-- or better yet see the video Ted
Gunderson Former FBI Chief - Most Terror Attacks Are Committed
By Our CIA And FBI featuring none other than Gunderson
himself! In
addition, many of the sinister or unstable roles played by Walken
in certain movies have been evil
characterizations of WASPs that reinforce Jewish Hollywood
stereotypes, and reflect Jewish subterranean envy and hatred
of WASPs that I discuss in greater
detail elsewhere. These roles are virtual Jewish archetypes
of the alienated, disoriented, rootless, slightly berserk, self-hating,
deracinated, "dress British and think Yiddish" white
American. (For example Walken's self-destructive Nick in The
Deerhunter, the slightly crazed Nordic-looking brother
of Annie Hall, or the thoroughly psychopathic villain
in A View to a Kill). Walken
has played twisted Nordic-Germanic iconic warrior or leader
memes, except here we are talking about a movie star with roles
crafted by Jewish Hollywood rather than Breivik's twisted Knights
Templar iconic memes probably crafted by Mossad-CIA-MI6. But
in the final analysis it all adds up to one massive longstanding
psychopolitical warfare campaign against declining WASP populations
around the world. Unless
Walken is willing to publicly address this issue himself, getting
involved with him in any kind of political capacity -- even
political satire -- could reinforce negative self-fulfilling
prophecies and also wind up sheep-dipping Norwegian-Americans,
Swedish Americans, Scottish Americans, German Americans, Russian
Americans and other individuals outside the Jewish-Catholic-led
Liberal Minority Coalition. Walken may also need to confront
any feelings of white self-hatred and ugly anti-Nordicism that
have been programmed deep into his psyche by controlled media. Of
course I am not saying that Chris Walken himself is a bad person.
He is a very talented actor, and in movies like The Dogs
of War he portrays many heroic traits. What I am
saying is that many of the roles created for him by Jewish Hollywood
reflect sicknesses that affect whites across America who have
been cut off from their European roots and who allow themselves
to be brainwashed by mainstream media. Now
that WASPs are another de facto a minority, and are getting
economically squeezed out, and are suffering myriad other setbacks,
we have to start playing a tighter game for our own survival.
In today's extremely toxic social and political environment
it is hard for someone like myself to try to do satire without
being misunderstood or having it backfire. Of
course the ultimate objective of the controllers of Mossad-CIA-MI6
is to make us all feel so paranoid, intimidated, and scared
that we all shut up. They do not leave us much room for light-hearted
humor or taking a joke on ourselves these days. I
believe that our best defense against their "full spectrum
dominance" and infiltration tactics is to try to honestly
educate the public and keep talking. However, I also think we
are most effective when we try to do it in a very calm and straightforward
way. And of course I fully support free speech rights for John
de Nugent and other people on the Right as well as people on
the Left. My
response to Janet Napolitano's creepy "Hear Something,
Say Something" tattle-tale program for Mossad-CIA-MI6-friendly
government bureaucrats is to report conjecture to the entire
world over the Internet, which is what I am doing here.
I will begin to respect Napolitano more when she is willing
to come forward and explain how "Al Qaeda" is mostly
a Mossad-CIA contrivance, how America is already overburdened
with too much government and needs the DHS and its invasive
sub-bureaucracies such as the TSA like hemorrhoids, how Americans
are under assault from Fukushima radiation fallout and radiation
accumulation in their food and water supplies, and how when
she and other members of the Liberal Minority Coalition keep
assaulting WASP America they are ultimately biting a hand that
has fed them and their people better for the last century than
any other people in history --and it already looks like they
have bit off so much the whole system is coming down -- but
they don't quit -- just like the ancient Mayans, Aztecs, and
other dark races who destroyed "Solutreans" and "Nordic
seafarers" in the Americas thousands of years ago. Now,
back to my narrative about events leading up to my aborted trip
to Oslo. On 19 May 2011 I mass-emailed The
Environmental Aspects of the Fukushima Crisis From the Viewpoint
of Both Norwegian and U.S. National Interests,
an open letter to the Counselor (Environment) at the Royal Norwegian
Embassy in Washington, D.C., which includes in the Appendix
a letter to Norway's Defense Attache where I explicitly advocated
holding a international conference on the Fukushima radiation
threat in a place like Oslo:
I
got started on the symposium concept on Saturday, 7 May during
a phone conversation with Dr. James Fetzer, co-founder of
Scholars for 9/11 Truth, and coauthor with me on a number
of alerts listed in my author archive at: http://tinyurl.com/5r3xqh.
He has been the keynote speaker at a number of symposia involving
9/11 research. He feels that a Fukushima symposium is desperately
needed. Leuren
Moret, who likes the idea of holding an initial symposium
in Oslo, Norway, is also on board with me. So is Dr. Doug
Rokke, a fellow Norwegian American, who was the former head
of the U.S. Army's Depleted Uranium (DU) program. All of these
individuals have been supplying me with leads and referrals
for other speakers, to include experts and organizations in
the UK, Germany, and Russia. Last
Saturday I had a long introductory meeting with Wayne Madsen
at http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
who said that he would happy to participate in a symposium.
He is a former U.S. Navy Intelligence and NSA officer, who
claims Danish descent. He is also a frequent correspondent
and contributor for RT (formerly Russia Today). Madsen can
comment on elements of high level intrigue and skullduggery
surrounding the ongoing Fukushima catastrophe. I already include
many extracts from his research on my Fukushima overview page
at: http://tinyurl.com/4924xzn.
My meeting with him is indicative of my desire to maintain
a friendly and open rapport with individuals affiliated with
intelligence services as well as military establishments both
in the United States and Europe who can assist in addressing
major crises such as the Fukushima Catastrophe.
Leuren
Moret subsequently told me
that according to her research, there may be people in the Norwegian
government who would be less than receptive towards my idea
of holding a Fukushima radiation threat conference in Oslo.
The Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) shut down its
public forecasts of the Fukushima radiation on the occult date
of 5-11 --despite the fact that the radiation threat was still
going strong. This is obviously a very bad indicator. Ms. Moret
says the Jewish Wallenberg family based in Sweden functions
as a Rothschild agent and they have their fingers in R &
D throughout Scandinavia. Last, but not least, in her 18 July
2011 interview with Dr. James Fetzer on the Real Deal
(see transcript
here), Leuren Moret described how certain individuals
connected to the Norwegian government may have been involved
with HAARP light shows and the HAARP heating of faults to generate
earthquakes in Japan on 3-11:
L.
Moret: Now
let me tell you a little more about the Tromso, Norway HAARP
facility. There were two guest Russian scientists who were
participating in that ionospheric heating experiment and it
had to have been over Japan. The night that Obama was arriving
in Norway at a military base there to receive his Nobel Prize
at the Karolinska Institute, there was a huge spiral, it is
called the Tromso Spiral, reported over that HAARP facility.
It was reported over in the news and the alternative news.
Everybody was doing interviews about it. Well, the next day
Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize for War. Remember -- Dr. Fetzer: This is one of the great absurdities
in the history of the Nobel Award, I must say. L. Moret: Right. So anyway that giant spiral
was apparently to anoint the new "Peace is War"
Nobel Prize winner. Dr. Fetzer: I had heard that there had been
a spectacular aural display over Norway at that period of
time, but not -- L. Moret: That's it. Dr. Fetzer: Yes. L. Moret: That's it. And so when I investigated
projects that the Wallenbergs had funded, I discovered that
they have new projects that they are funding, and they are
actually determining the big science projects throughout Europe
for the next 20 years. So it is the bankers who are funding
the big science projects and applications. And these are for
their benefit. They are not for the benefit of the public...
L.
Moret: The other piece of evidence that I was researching
with another friend, and he discovered, we co-discovered,
that the Tromso, Norway HAARP facility was conducting a heating
experiment of the ionosphere for a week before the Fukushima
earthquake. Now the Gakona, Alaska HAARP facility for a week
before the earthquake was transmitting the 2.5 hz signal which
is the particular wavelength that is used to trigger earthquakes.
And the Tromso, Norway site was doing heating experiments,
and what NASA scientists visiting MIT reported in May 18th,
right after the NASA reports, the Technology Review at MIT
published by MIT, reported with a chart of the heating spots
and the intensity of the heating spots. The heating patterns
for about a month showed that these round heating spots, that
is another finger print of HAARP. The antennae produces round
beams, and these heating spots were heating at different areas
along the entire plate tectonic zone that goes the whole length
of the east side of Japan. So they were obviously heating
certain parts of the earthquake zone that were locked and
had a lot of energy stored up because the fault zone was stuck.
And that increases stress and strain until it finally -- there
is excess energy there and finally it pops. So they are actually
using the heating beam, transmitted through the ionosphere
from these HAARP facilities all over the world. But apparently
Tromso, Norway and Gakona, Alaska were involved. And it boils
the water in the fault zone and it causes it to form steam
or to expand and it pushes the fault zone apart enough to
get it to release.
Dr. Fetzer: When water changes from liquid to steam, it increases
in volume by 1,600 times. L. Moret: That's right, and there is a lot
of water -- Dr. Fetzer: There is a lot of water in the
ocean! L. Moret: There is a lot of water in fault
zones. Now, get this, get this. Tromso, Norway was established
as a HAARP facility in 1974. It was funded by the Wallenberg
bankers in Scandinavia, and there are six countries, seven
countries that own it. Number one is the UK, Britain. Number
two is Norway, Finland, Sweden, Japan, China, and Germany
is also involved.
In
early July I decided to get aggressive about going to Norway
to try to set up a Fukushima-related conference. During the
week of 11-15 July I tried to rent an apartment over the Internet
in Oslo, but before I forked over any money, I figured out that
a person who claimed to own an apartment in Oslo while residing
in the UK who was trying to negotiate with me was a scam artist,
so I reported this person to the police in Oslo and the UK,
which probably also wound up advertising my travel intentions
to the Norwegian Police
Security Service and MI5 and MI6. Also, I sent an email
to British police stating my suspicion that the scamster could
be involved with a Mossad-related operation. On
Saturday 16 July I bought my plane ticket to fly out of JFK
on Wednesday evening, 20 July, and ultimately arrive in Oslo
at 12:20 PM on Icelandair Flight 318 on 21 July, roughly a full
day before the bomb went off. However, at the last moment a
number of things happened that did not smell right and caused
me to abort my trip, such as individual in Oslo who said he
would provide lodging upon my arrival, who became incommunicado,
as well as an individual who said he wanted to rent my car and
provide transportation for me on Wednesday from my place in
western Pennsylvania, who also strangely "evaporated"
at the last moment and has not been in contact with me ever
since. This latter individual is an activist who has appeared
on Republic Broadcasting Network, but does not want me to publicly
acknowledge my contact with him. I found out while letting him
test drive my car that he knew Ted Gunderson and has a high
opinion of him. Getting
back to my mention of SFC Buswell at the beginning of this section,
when he sent me the "Hey do you think?" email, now
it should be clearer to the reader what he had in mind. When
I bought my plane ticket on Saturday, was I like the little
snowflake that inadvertently triggers an avalanche, that may
have upgraded one of the myriad Mossad-CIA pre-planned operations
into a "target of opportunity," so that by Monday
a deuterium "Red Mercury" type bomb made in Dimona
(as described in the extract
provided in the "Oslo Bombing" section in Part
IV) may have been slipped into the diplomatic pouch from
Israel to Norway, and some "Gidon" unit Mossad assassins
also headed northwards to serve as backups to insure that the
"wet work" planned for Utoya island racked up adequate
"body count." Then when I cancelled my flight on Wednesday,
somebody in the upper levels of Mossad-CIA-MI6 may have said
"Oh well, so much is already in motion and we really want
to do this anyway, so we will just go ahead with a `Plan B'
patsy like Breivik." "Plan
A", if I had arrived in Oslo, might have been to arrest
me shortly after the bomb went off, throw me in jail, prevent
me from communicating with the public, make up some wild story
about how I am part of some kind of neo-Nazi global cyber activist
conspiracy, plant kiddie porn on my hard drive, and then "suicide"
me in jail so that I can't contradict the official cover story
(not any wilder than what has already been done to Edgar Steele,
David Hinkson, or even what happened to Dr. Thomas B. Manton
over the BP Gulf Catastrophe, as noted
below). Or
maybe Mossad-CIA-MI6 operatives could take me out to Utoya Island,
shoot me twice in the head with a pistol, plant the pistol in
my palm, and claim that I am the "lone nut" who killed
everybody before I decided to suicide myself once I saw the
police coming (reminiscent of the way journalist Gary Webb somehow
also "suicided"
himself with two shots in the head after he exposed how
the CIA was pushing cocaine on the African American community
in Los Angeles, and certainly no less suspicious than the deaths
of people like CPL Pat Tillman, COL Ted Westhusing, or Senator
Paul Wellstone who I cover in Chapter
14:Cindy Sheehan, Camp Casey, and
Info War Martyrs). Or something like this. There
are all kinds of possibilities. This
could have also been a perfect Mossad-CIA-MI black joke on myself.
Having worked so hard to try to prevent false flag attacks,
such as
authoring and coauthoring alerts and writing the Mission
of Conscience series, and then suddenly I
find myself accused of fomenting one! Mossad-CIA-MI6 often likes
to embed little "Ha! Ha!s" in their black ops, for
example, the 7-11 bombing in Mumbai was a nasty little joke
on Indians who operate 7-11 stores in the U.S. (see Chapter
21 of my Mission of Conscience series).
Imagine me arriving in Oslo, giving a naive sigh of relief --
back in a great Nordic ancestral homeland, free at last from
the heavily Fukushima radiation/GMO-contaminated,
FUBAR-"New
Babylon"-U.S.S.A.-Obamanation
Zio-Police state, only to be framed as a patsy and executed
by blank-check pro-Zionist New World Order Quislings at the
highest levels of the Norwegian government. Ha! Ha! Yuk! Yuk!
Yuk! I
would prefer not to go too far in speculating at this point,
except to say that in running hypothetical scenarios in my mind,
I just want to reemphasize for the public record that I am a
paleoconservative and want to head off any kind of possible
future scenario where somebody might try to use my contact with
John de Nugent to set me up as a patsy and claim that I am part
of some kind of "global Nazi conspiracy." Also, I
want to defuse any potential public hysteria that might get
generated in the future against John de Nugent himself, which
is another reason why I have urged him to publicly deal with
the possibility that he may have received MK ULTRA programming.
Last, but not least, I never heard of Anders Breivik until after
he got in the news on 7-22, nor had any association whatsoever
with anyone or anything he has ever been associated with; however,
it is also probably true that my own personal politics and background
involving cyber activism, false flag research and the 9/11 Truth
movement, status as a U.S. military veteran, heavy involvement
with alternative media, criticism of Israel, criticism of suspected
Norwegian Mossad collaborators, criticism of the U.S. and UK
governments, espousal of nationalism, promotion of Nordic heritage
and the Asatru movement -- all these things are certainly a
lot closer to what Mossad-CIA-MI6 really wants to demonize
compared to Breivik's "Christian Zionism" and other
screwy aspects of his "legend" that might suggest
a suddenly activated "Plan B" "sleeper agent"
or "useful idiot." Please
bear in mind that Mossad-CIA-MI6 and associates have been playing
very rough and dirty with their "patsies,"
"suspects," or other people they just don't like in
recent years, such as the case of the Info War martyrs described
in Chapter
14, or someone like the aforementioned journalist
Gary Webb who caught the CIA selling cocaine to African-Americans
in Los Angeles and allegedly "suicided"
himself by shooting himself twice in the head.
As another example, on my BP
Gulf Catastrophe web page, under the section "False
flag operators usually require powerful intimidation propaganda"
I list the following articles:
. Based
on all of the aforementioned discussion and references, it should
now be very clear to the reader that it is not beyond certain
"authorities" these days to arrest a completely innocent
person as a patsy, throw him in jail, prevent this person from
communicating with the public, fabricate an extraordinary personal
history (to include planting "kiddie porn" on a hard
drive), drum up myriad "guilt by association" contacts,
and then "suicide" the person while they are still
in custody to silence him forever (or in the case of someone
like Lee Harvey Oswald, have a confederate like Jack Ruby just
kill this person outright, see Final
Judgment by Mike Piper). My
main personal focus remains research and analysis, and I strenuously
object to the public hysteria against white activists being
generated by Janet Napolitano at DHS. See for example the 21
July 22 article DHS
Video Characterizes White Americans as Most Likely Terrorists
by Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars.com. Also please see my "From
de Richelieu to Robespierre" essay and commentary
on "Big Sis" on this web page in which I lay out
my concerns about state-sponsored hysteria, government disinformation,
and police state intimidation tactics in America today.
Additional
References
Miscellaneous
Links
9/11 Truth activists involved with Oslo/Utoya 7-22
Total
Information This is the web site of "Total"
who was interview by Dr. James Fetzer 25 July 2011 9/11
Truth Norway, Torstein Viddal's site, Dr. Fetzer
23 Sept 2011 interview transcript Here. Fakta
Mot Makta facebook page by Torstein Viddal terroronthetube.co.uk
Nick Kollerstrom's site, Dr. Fetzer 23 Sept 2011 transcript
Here.
A relic from the earlier laws of Denmark-Norway, Paragraph
2 originally read, "The Evangelical-Lutheran religion
remains the public religion of the State. Those inhabitants,
who confess thereto, are bound to raise their children to
the same. Jesuits and monastic orders are not permitted. Jews
are still prohibited from entry to the Realm." In 1851
the last sentence was struck after the famous Norwegian poet
Henrik Wergeland had campaigned for the rights of the Jews,
and in 1897 also the next but last sentence. Monastic orders
were permitted 1897, but the ban on Jesuits was only lifted
1956.§12 in the constitution still states that more than
half of the persons in the Council of State have to be members
of the state church, a paragraph that has grown strongly controversial.
Books
Norway:
The Red Terror Island By Ivar Fjeld, (PDF), 187
Pages. Book description: "In 2009, on the island of Utoya,
the youth wing of a political party in Norway collected money
for the terrorist organization Popular Front for the Liberation
of Palestine.(PFLP). This terror-organization is banned in the
USA, The European Union, Canada and the United Kingdom. Two
years later the Fascist terrorist Anders Behring Breivik killed
69 Labour party youth on the same island. The truth about this
massacre in Norway is painful. This island was used as an educational
base for Arabian terrorists who work for the full destruction
of the state of Israel. This book is a documentary of the activities
that took place on Utoya, years before the worst terror-strike
on Norwegian soil after World War II." [Ed. Note: I have
not had a chance to review this book, however, I have uncovered
enough evidence so far to suggest that :"Mossad-CIA-MI6
mind-controlled agent or patsy" is probably a much more
accurate term than "fascist terrorist" to describe
Breivik, and furthermore showing sympathy for the abuse of Palestinians
at the hand of Zionists by collecting money to help alleviate
Palestinian poverty is not the same thing as collecting money
to fund "Red terror," and it would be interesting
to see if this book bothers to make this distinction. Already
smells like possible Mossad-CIA-MI6 disinformation.]
Significant
Videos
2011-09-23 Why
the Oslo Massacre Happened (video) (12:55) "Those
who force mutliculturalism down our throats are responsible
for creating a man like Anders Behring Breivik, they can't genocide
us and expect that nothing will happened" [Ed. Note: Some
interesting film clips, but no mention of a Mossad-CIA-MI6 false
flag operation].
2011-08-15 Norway
mass murderer Anders Breivik Utoya island shooting where he
killed 69 people (video).
2011-08-09 Rauni-Leena
Luukanen-Kilde - The Norway Massacre, Anders Behring Breivik
& Mind Control (video) (1:54:53) [Soundtrack
only]. Uploader caption: "Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde returns
to Red Ice Radio to discuss the Norway massacre, the Oslo bombings,
the shootings at Utøya, the motives of the accused Anders
Behring Breivik and the possibility of him being a victim of
mind control. Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde is a medical doctor,
originally from Finland, currently living in Norway. She was
the chief medical officer of Lapland and is better known for
her books and lectures on mind control and conspiracies. Her
work also includes parapsychology and out-of-body experiences.
In this interview, we cover what we know so far about the Norway
attacks on Friday the 22nd of July. As the media feasts on this
tragedy, more information is not only coming to light, some
of it is being buried as well. Who benefits from the attacks?
We'll discuss Breivik's manifesto "2083 - A European Declaration
of Independence". We'll also talk about the inconsistencies
of the bombings, the strange actions by certain people and how
this tragedy is being used for political purposes. Later, we
take a closer look at the symbolism involved in this massacre
and the history of mind control in Norway and abroad."
[Editor's Note: An outstanding interview filled with insights].
2011-07-30 Zionist
Terrorism in Norway (video) by Dr. David Duke.
This video exposes Zionist support for the terrorist mass murder
of Norwegians.
2011-07-27 Alan
Watt: Oslo Gunman’s Massacre, A Design Ritual of Mind
Control, The Alex Jones Channel, "Alex also
talks with author, researcher and radio talk show host Alan
Watt." [Embedded videos of the Alan Watt interview with
Alex Jones on the web page].
2011-07-27 Oslo
Bombing 7-22-11 - Inconsistencies (37:37) caption: "Is
the official story about the Oslo bombings correct? Is the media
and the police giving us the full story? Looking
at the available photographs and video, is there physical evidence
of a 900 - 1500 kilo fertilizer bomb, going off inside of a
Volkswagen Crafter, parked between the H-Block building and
R4 building at the government quarters in Oslo? What
if the explosion came from underground? What if there was multiple
explosions? Can the car bomb story be a cover? Perhaps even
worse, what if an unconventional weapon was used? These
are just some of the question that arise after you examine the
available evidence."
2011-07-26Norwegian
claims accomplices in terror attacks (video) abc.net.au,
"Anders Behring Breivik has told an Oslo court he did not
act alone in carrying out a shooting spree and two explosions.
2011-07-26 The
Norway Bombing and Israel? Video (11:19) by Morris."The
likelihood of this thirty two year old single handedly accomplishing
what he is said to have done is extremely unlikely." See
also 2011-07-30 Norway
Bombing Causing Israeli Govt to Collapse? (6:16)
with the same narrator "Morris." At 4:31 "The
previous French foreign minister has just published a book.
He says the entire French intelligence, and I stress the entire,
is run by Israel. Now why do you think Britain should be different
to Britain, America, or Norway? It is not." [Editor's Note:
A sample YouTube viewer comment
regarding the topic of this video: "@dryflyguyokI've been
researching Israel. Not only are they the children of the serpent,
but they have a very long history of conniving and deceiving
in order to gain sympathy. They will do anything to achieve
their objectives, even placing a controlled opponent, so don't
believe the hype. This is nothing but a contrived movement in
order to give the impression that they have an internal problem.
It's all a lie. Don't believe anything that? comes from Israel.
Be Wary before forming an opinion." by Nellnyc10032.]
2011-07-26 Anders
Behring Breivik is 'insane', says Norway killer's lawyer:The lawyer defending Norwegian killer Anders Behring
Breivik says that "this whole case indicated that he is
insane". "Breivik, who bombed a building
in central Oslo before killing 68 people at a youth camp on
Utoeya island, had been under the influence of drugs while carrying
out the attack according to his lawyer, Geir Lippestad."
[Editor's Note: This article also includes a short video of
the lawyer]
2011-07-26 Alex
Jones: ‘Anders Behring was Masons’ Patsy’
RT (Video), Decoding the symbols. Did Masonic psychology
inspire Oslo attacks?
2011-07-26 Utoya
Victims(5:15)
2011-07-25 Norway
Attack Suspect's Unabomber Inspiration? (video)
FOXNEWS, interview with Terrie Turchie, former FBI Agent "Confessed
killer said to have copied passages from Ted Kaczynski's manifesto"
2011-07-25 Webster
Tarpley : The Oslo Job (video), (1:22:45) soundtrack
of Jeff Rense interview. [Editor's Note: Tarpley blames the
attack on NATO intelligence, does not mention the Mossad.]
2011-07-25 Paul
Watson & Webster Tarpley: Media Paints Breivik as Oswald
Type Gunman (video), The Alex Jones Channel, "Placing
complete trust in the details emerging about gunman Anders Behring
Breivik would be foolish."
2011-07-25 Dr.
Webster Tarpley: Norway, Don't Be Hypnotized by Fake Cover Story
of Breivik The Patsy 1/2 (14:43)
Part 2 (13:02) "...This is a patsy on steroids.
..it is inconceivable without NATO intelligence.."
2011-07-25 Oslo
explosion: Dramatic amateur footage minutes after Norway blast,
RT Video
2011-07-24 Norway
Killer Anders Breivik - big ego, religious, possibly brainwashed,
RT Video "The man suspected of being behind
yesterday's attacks in Norway has a big ego and easily gets
irritated by those from the Middle East and Asia, Ulav Andersson,
who knows Anders Behring Breivik personally, told RT. "
2011-07-24 Alex
Jones & Webster Tarpley: Norway Terror Attacks a False Flag
Staged Event! 1/2 (video) (14:56) Part
2 (9:32)
2011-07-24 Suspected
Oslo Shooter Publishes Manifesto (Video) 2:31.
FOXNEWS
2011-07-23 At
least 87 slaughtered at Labor Party youth gathering in Norway
(RT Video) "Undetonated explosives were also
found on the island. Norwegian broadcaster NRK reported that
a bomb was found in a car on Utoya Island possibly belonging
to the shooter."
2011-07-23 'Multikulti
backfired with carnage as Norway gunman turned on his own' (RT)
(3:39)
2011-07-23 Staged
Terror Attack On Norway! 1/1 (video) (10:01) Part
2 (9:28), Infowars.com, Alex Jones narrates this
special report as he scrolls through computer screen shots.
2011-07-23 Caution!
Watch out for false flags' - Lendman on Oslo attacks (RT Video)
(7:38)
2011-07-23 Oslo
Bombing - Looking Like A False Flag Attack (July 2011)
2011-07-23Second
man detained over Norway shooting; False Flag Attack? RT
2011-07-22 Amateur
Video: Aftermath of Oslo Bomb Attack (video), Amateur
footage captures the eerie moments direct after a blast hits
central Oslo, wrecking the Office of the Prime Minister, and
setting fires in the Norwegian Oil Ministry opposite.
2011-07-22 Bomb
blast rocks downtown Oslo (video) RT"Blast
so powerful it blew out windows more than a kilometer away.
Witnesses said they saw thick smoke rising from the nearby oil
ministry building after it also caught fire...
2011-07-22 Oslo
Eyewitness/Survivor Calls Alex with Exclusive Account of Bombing
- Alex Jones Tv 1/2, Part
2/2. Alex Jones immediately suspects a false flag
attack. "...Why would "terrorists," who presumably
want to kill as many people as possible, choose to bomb the
building on a holiday when they know it will be almost empty?
...we see "blond Al Qaeda" right when Janet Napolitano
says white Al Qaeda is going to get you. Can you see how the
scripting is done on this. It is ridiculous."
2011-07-22 Strong
explosion rocks Oslo, 7 dead, 15 injured in 'car bomb' blast
RT (video) (1:08) A report of a second bomb.
2011-07-22 5
Reasons Why The Oslo Bombing Already Looks Like A False Flag
Attack (video)
2011-07-20Zionist
Terrorism in Norway
2011-02-21
9/11
Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov
and Gordon Duff Discuss (YouTube) (1:30:41) [Ed.
Note: This is the sound track of Dr. Kevin Barrett's interview
with Dmitri Khalezov and Duff. At 15:35 into the interview,
former Soviet intelligence officer Dimitri Khalezov involved
in detecting nuclear tests around the world describes how he
detected an mininuke explosion under the Chernobyl nuclear reactor.
He also discusses the use of mininukes on 9/11 and other false
flag operations. Please see Mike
Harari, Mossad, and 9/11, dated 8 March 2011, mrfriendsblog.blogspot.com.
This is relevant to Oslo/Utoya 7-22 in two ways. First, Khalezov
discusses various types of mininukes, (we can infer that one
of them was probably used in Oslo, although he does no explicitly
discuss Oslo which came after this article), and secondly he
has met with Mike Harari, the "black ops rock star"
of the Mossad who was apparently involved in the Lilllehammer
Mossad assassination, 9/11, and probably Oslo 7-22 as well.
As noted elsewhere on this web page, I have reservations
with parts of Khalezov's story.].
2012-04-25 Anders Breivik:
A 21st Century Strategy Of Tension? with Brit Dee & Tom
Secker of Resis Radio (Red Ice Radio resource page
here
on behalf of resistradio.com web page here,
MP3 download here,
57 MB, 1 hr).
2011-12-01 Peter Dale Scott - Hour 1 - Norway's Massacre, Breivik
& Deep Events (Red Ice Radio resource page here,
Hr. 1 MP3 download here,
23.4 MB, 49:38) 2011-10-28"Fukushima / New Bombs
and War Crimes in Fallujah" Dr. James Fetzer interviews
Leuren Moret (1st and 2nd hour) and Dr. Christopher Busby (2nd
hr), (The Real Deal,
MP3 download link Here,
41.8 MB, 1:58:58). Leuren Moret and Dr. Busby discuss the horrifying
radiation assault on North America and Europe that the "establishment"
is covering up, the same evil group that probably fostered Oslo-Utoya.
The
transcripts are posted at the America First Institute as "Fukushima
Radiation and Uranium Weapon Update" and
at Veterans Today under the title for hour one: Catastrophic
Effects of Radiation Contamination and hour two: New
Bombs and War Crimes in Fallujah. 2011-10-21Alex Jones denounces Janet
Napolitano (Infowars.com,
archived at GCN
Alex Jones Show archives, First hour, download here,
6.9 MB, 58 min) [Editor's Note: The terms and phrases such as
"Janet the Troll," "Witch," Monster,"
"Anti-American Pig," "Magic
Weasel Fairy," and "Jack-booted Little
Miss Hitler"take place between 24:08 and
29:53, bookmarked by ad breads]. 2011-09-23Dr. James Fetzer interview
with Nick Kollerstrom and Torstein Viddal; Tony Farrell; London
7/7 and Oslo bombing (The
Real Deal, Download here,
42.8 MB, 2 hrs). Transcript Here. 2011-08-04Erik Palmgren interview
with Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde – The Norway Massacre,
Anders Behring Breivik & Mind Control (Red
Ice Radio, Sweden, Red
Ice Program Page on The Norway Massacre and Mind Control,
Part 1 download here,
Part 1, 27.5 MB, 56 min; Part 2 download here,
27.7 MB, 57 min). Transcript here.
"The Norway massacre, the Oslo bombings, the shootings
at Utøya, the motives of the accused Anders Behring Breivik
and the possibility of him being a victim of mind control. Rauni-Leena
Luukanen-Kilde is a medical doctor, originally from Finland,
currently living in Norway...Topics Discussed: motives, Israel,
Palestine, Bill Gates, NATO, Norway's Lebensborn, LSD, mind
control, Mossad, CIA, EDL, MI5, MI6, Tesla weapons, Dr Judy
Wood - Directed Energy Weapon, car bomb, gun laws, bombing of
King David's Hotel on July 22nd 65 years ago, murder of Anna
Lindh, Zionists, Oslo accords, Palestinian state, Operation
Gladio, strategy of tension, left government of Norway, manifesto,
Jonas Gahr Store, Mijailo Mijailovic hearing voices, Norway
quitting NATO bombings of Libya early, Norwegian Police, Sirhan
Sirhan, delta programming and more." 2011-07-27Carolyn Yeager interviews
Kairos Theos about Fjordman.com and Norway 7-22 impact on right
wing movements (The
Heretics Hour, Voice of Reason, Download here,
13.8 MB, 57 min) [Editor's Note: This show was originated on
Republic Broadcasting Network, but is no longer archived either
there or at Ms. Yeager's flagship site at VoR, therefore I am
hosting it on my own server.] 2011-07-25Dr. James
Fetzer interview with Paul, Rolf, and Total on the Oslo Travesty,
(The Real Deal,
Download here,
42.2 MB, 2 hrs). Transcript here. 2011-07-24Norway:
Don’t Be Hypnotized by the Fake Legend/Cover Story of
Breivik the Patsy; Focus on the Moles and the Technicians, Especially
the Second Shooter by Webster Tarpley, Tarpley.net,
MP3 download here. 2011-07-23Stan Hess: Norway is Noway
(The
European American Hour with Stan Hess, reasonradionetwork.com,
Download here,
13 MB, 57 min) "Stan discusses Anders Breivik’s maniacal
killings within the framework of Zionism’s influence on
European peoples world wide." 2008-12-22Alex Jones interview with
William Engdahl: Full Spectrum Dominance: Will financial collapse:
impact the global agenda? (Infowars.com,
download here,
12.3 MB, 52 min) [Editor's Note: This is an excellent discussion
of the kinds of problems in U.S. global strategy that could
contribute to Oslo-Utoya 7-22.] 2007-07-23 HAARP and Mind Control, Alfred Webre
interviews Leuren Moret, (Vancouver Coop Radio 102.7 FM Coopradio.org,
Download Here,
13.6 MB, 58:10) [Ed. Note: This is an excellent introduction
to the topic of mind control. The web
page containing the transcript has valuable links to additional
sources].